| Literature DB >> 34764584 |
Dilbag Singh1, Vijay Kumar2, Manjit Kaur1.
Abstract
The extensively utilized tool to detect novel coronavirus (COVID-19) is a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). However, RT-PCR kits are costly and consume critical time, around 6 to 9 hours to classify the subjects as COVID-19(+) or COVID-19(-). Due to the less sensitivity of RT-PCR, it suffers from high false-negative results. To overcome these issues, many deep learning models have been implemented in the literature for the early-stage classification of suspected subjects. To handle the sensitivity issue associated with RT-PCR, chest CT scans are utilized to classify the suspected subjects as COVID-19 (+), tuberculosis, pneumonia, or healthy subjects. The extensive study on chest CT scans of COVID-19 (+) subjects reveals that there are some bilateral changes and unique patterns. But the manual analysis from chest CT scans is a tedious task. Therefore, an automated COVID-19 screening model is implemented by ensembling the deep transfer learning models such as Densely connected convolutional networks (DCCNs), ResNet152V2, and VGG16. Experimental results reveal that the proposed ensemble model outperforms the competitive models in terms of accuracy, f-measure, area under curve, sensitivity, and specificity.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Chest CT; Deep learning; Transfer learning
Year: 2021 PMID: 34764584 PMCID: PMC7867501 DOI: 10.1007/s10489-020-02149-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Intell (Dordr) ISSN: 0924-669X Impact factor: 5.019
Fig. 1Proposed ensemble densely connected convolutional neural networks
Fig. 2A view of chest-CT scanned images dataset
Fig. 3Accuracy and loss analysis of the proposed ensemble model on training dataset
Fig. 4Confusion matrix of the proposed ensemble model on the testing dataset
Testing analysis (in %) of the proposed automated screening model
| Model | Accuracy | Area under curve | F-measure | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNN | 97.2818 | 97.1372 | 97.2912 | 98.1837 | 96.9382 |
| VGG16 | 97.9821 | 97.8324 | 97.8372 | 98.1949 | 96.9827 |
| ResNet152V2 | 98.1392 | 98.2831 | 97.8292 | 98.78929 | 97.8821 |
| Alexnet | 98.2939 | 98.3928 | 97.9394 | 98.8929 | 97.3928 |
| DenseNet201 | 98.4822 | 98.2932 | 97.9282 | 97.2939 | |
| Inceptionnet V3 | 98.2839 | 98.1382 | 98.1933 | 98.3283 | 98.1839 |
| Proposed | 98.8372 |
Performance analysis of the proposed automated screening model over the existing models
| Model | Accuracy(in %) |
|---|---|
| Lightweight CNN [ | 96.28% |
| COVID-Net [ | 12.6% |
| CovidCTNet [ | 90% |
| CNN [ | 86% |
| Three-phase deep learning [ | 99.65% |
| DenseNet169 [ | 88.6% |
| DeCoVNet [ | 90.1% |
| DenseNet121 [ | 93% |
| EfficientNet B4 [ | 96% |
| Attention-based deep learning [ | 94.3% |
| COVNet [ | 96% |
| 3D UNet [ | 94% |
| ResNet34 [ | 81.9% |
| UNet [ | 84% |
| DenseNet201 [ | 97% |
| Proposed |