| Literature DB >> 36248885 |
Liyan Wang1,2, Yanbiao Jiang3, Haofei Shen3, Xiaoling Ma1,2, Mingxia Gao1,2, Panpan Jin1,2, Rui Zhang1,2, Lihui Zhao1,2, Xuehong Zhang1,2.
Abstract
Background: Early pregnancy loss (EPL) is the most prevalent complication, particularly in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment. The present study aimed to determine whether the serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level after 14 days of embryo transfer, either alone or in conjunction with other parameters in IVF/ICSI cycles, could be used to predict subsequent EPL.Entities:
Keywords: IVF/ICSI cycle; early pregnancy loss; human chorionic gonadotropin; prediction; risk factors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36248885 PMCID: PMC9556765 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.992121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Figure 1Flow chart of the research.
The characteristics of cycles in the study population(N=6600).
| Ongoing pregnancy (n = 5620) | Early pregnancy loss (n = 980) | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Maternal age (y) | 30.39 ± 4.04 | 31.74 ± 4.81 | <.01 |
| Paternal age (y) | 32.07 ± 4.80 | 33.51 ± 5.64 | <.01 |
| Maternal BMI (kg/m2) | 22.20 ± 3.11 | 22.46 ± 3.01 | <.05 |
| Infertility duration (y) | 3.83 ± 2.80 | 4.17 ± 3.24 | <.01 |
| Infertility type | <.01 | ||
| Primary | 3320 (59.33%) | 523 (53.64%) | |
| Secondary | 2276 (40.67%) | 452 (46.36%) | |
| AFC | 14.99 ± 6.74 | 14.54 ± 7.33 | <.01 |
| Number of retrieved oocytes | 13.98 ± 6.26 | 13.01 ± 6.30 | <.01 |
| Number of metaphase-2 oocytes | 12.69 ± 6.01 | 11.88 ± 6.17 | <.01 |
| Fertilization methods | .64 | ||
| IVF | 3489 (62.08%) | 616 (62.86%) | |
| ICSI | 2131 (37.92%) | 364 (37.14%) | |
| Endometrial thickness (cm) | 1.13 ± 0.21 | 1.11 ± 0.22 | <.01 |
| Number of transferred embryos | .19 | ||
| 1 | 1572 (27.97%) | 198 (20.20%) | |
| 2 | 3529 (62.79%) | 733 (74.80%) | |
| 3 | 519 (9.23%) | 49 (5.00%) | |
| E2/P | 3.12 ± 2.16 | 2.91 ± 2.18 | <.01 |
| β-hCG (IU/L) | 1139.04 ± 1048.72 | 564.03 ± 838.16 | <.01 |
Values are mean±standard deviation or number (percentage)
AFC, total antral follicle count; BMI, body mass index.
Figure 2Lasso regression analysis of factors related to EPL. (A) LASSO coefficient profiles of the factors. The vertical line was drawn at the value selected by 10-fold cross-validation, where the optimal λ resulted in 13 nonzero coefficients. (B) The lambda (λ) selection process in the LASSO regression is depicted. The value of λ that gave the minimum average binomial deviance was applied to select the features. Dotted vertical lines were drawn at the optimal values using the minimum criteria and the 1 − SE criteria. The optimal value of 0.0019 with a log(λ) value of -6.2754 was obtained.
The risk factors associated with the incident early pregnancy loss in fresh IVF/ICSI cycles.
| Variables | Univariable | Multivariable | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |
| Maternal age (y) | 1.0781 (1.0612, 1.0954) | < .01 | 1.0423 (1.0158, 1.0696) | < .01 |
| Paternal age (y) | 1.0562 (1.0426, 1.0700) | < .01 | 1.0229 (1.0018, 1.0445) | < .05 |
| Maternal BMI (kg/m2) | 1.0274 (1.0053, 1.0499) | < .05 | 0.9910 (0.9666, 1.0161) | .48 |
| Infertility duration (y) | 1.0390 (1.0161, 1.0625) | <.01 | 1.0004 (0.9747, 1.0268) | .98 |
| Infertility type | ||||
| Primary | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||
| Secundary | 1.2607 (1.0996, 1.4454) | < 0.01 | 1.0206 (0.8666, 1.2020) | 0.81 |
| AFC | 0.9902 (0.9800, 1.0004) | .06 | 1.0187 (1.0055, 1.0321) | < .01 |
| Number of retrieved oocytes | 0.9749 (0.9641, 0.9859) | < .01 | 0.9642 (0.9277, 1.0021) | .06 |
| Number of metaphase-2 oocytes | 0.9774 (0.9662, 0.9888) | < .01 | 1.0231 (0.9840, 1.0638) | .25 |
| Endometrial thickness (cm) | 0.5633 (0.4055, 0.7826) | < .01 | 0.5669 (0.3950, 0.8136) | < .01 |
| E2/P | 0.9466 (0.9107, 0.9839) | <.01 | 0.9683 (0.9292, 1.0090) | .13 |
| β-hCG (IU/L) | 0.9987 (0.9985, 0.9988) | < .01 | 0.9987 (0.9986, 0.9989) | < .01 |
AFC, total antral follicle count; BMI, body mass index; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
The association between β-hCG level and the risk of early pregnancy loss occurrence.
| hCG quartiles (IU/L) | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjusted OR (95%CI) | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | Adjusted OR (95%CI) | |
| <412.9 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 412.9-790.8 | 0.26 (0.22, 0.31)* | 0.26 (0.22, 0.31)* | 0.27 (0.22, 0.33)* |
| 790.9-1390 | 0.18 (0.15, 0.22)* | 0.19 (0.15, 0.23)* | 0.19 (0.15, 0.24)* |
| >1390 | 0.11 (0.09, 0.14)* | 0.11 (0.09, 0.14)* | 0.11(0.09, 0.14)* |
| P for trend | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Model 1:unadjusted.
Model 2:adjusted for maternal age, paternal age, number of retrieved oocytes, duration of infertility, and maternal BMI.
Model 3:adjusted for maternal age, paternal age, number of retrieved oocytes, duration of infertility, maternal BMI, total AFC, type of infertility, number of metaphase-2 oocytes, endometrial thickness, E2/P.
*P < 0.001.
Figure 3Nomogram for predicting the risk of EPL. AFC, total antral follicle count.
Figure 4Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves comparing the potential of different variables to predict early pregnancy loss. (A) The prediction of individual variables. (B) Predictive ability of different models of early pregnancy loss. Model 1 included maternal age, paternal age, AFC, and endometrial thickness; Model 2, model 1 plus β-hCG.
Accuracy of different variables and models in IVF/ICSI clinic pregnancy to predict early pregnancy loss.
| AUC | 95%CI | P value | Best threshold | Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-hCG (IU/L) | 0.7477 | 0.7296-0.7657 | 542.45 | 71.13 | 67.71 | 28.80 | 92.74 | |
| Maternal age (y) | 0.5780 | 0.5576-0.5983 | < .001 | 33.50 | 79.00 | 33.47 | 21.75 | 87.19 |
| Paternal age (y) | 0.5699 | 0.5498-0.5901 | < .001 | 32.50 | 59.56 | 51.44 | 18.13 | 87.57 |
| AFC | 0.5277 | 0.5072-0.5482 | < .001 | 10.75 | 73.24 | 33.75 | 17.99 | 86.41 |
| Endometrial thickness (cm) | 0.4622 | 0.4421-0.4824 | < .001 | 1.48 | 93.49 | 6.97 | 15.78 | 85.17 |
| Model 1 | 0.5834 | 0.5626-0.6043 | < .001 | -1.73 | 63.62 | 48.95 | 18.78 | 87.88 |
| Model 2 | 0.7462 | 0.7279-0.7645 | .815 | -1.39 | 77.54 | 61.9 | 31.91 | 92.29 |
AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.
Model 1 included maternal age, paternal age, No. of retrieved oocytes, AFC and endometrial thickness;.
Model 2, model 1 plus β-hCG.
P values express the significance of the differences between β-hCG and other variables or the two models.