| Literature DB >> 36248591 |
Jianjia He1,2,3, Jusheng Liu4, Tingting Li1, Liangrong Song1.
Abstract
With the arbitrariness of family business decision-making and the complexity of interests become increasingly prominent, the transformation and innovation of family business are imminent. Under the above background, via analysis of data from 259 valid questionnaires from more than ten family businesses in China as a sample and with the help of the SPSS and AMOS, this study explored the impacts of identification on creativity of the family business as well as the mediating role of family business support by constructing a mediating model. The results show that the employee's identification has a positive impact on the creativity of the family business. Besides, identification has a positive impact on family business support and family business support has a partial mediating role between identification and family business creativity. Especially, the emotional support does not have a mediating role, whereas the instrumental support has a complete mediating role between identification and family business creativity.Entities:
Keywords: creativity; family business; family business support; identification; mediating role
Year: 2022 PMID: 36248591 PMCID: PMC9557970 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.991899
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Research model.
Variable coefficient values.
| Research variables | Cronbach-α | Based on standardized items Cronbach-α |
|---|---|---|
| Identification | 0.823 | 0.823 |
| family business support | 0.898 | 0.898 |
| Creativity of family business | 0.884 | 0.884 |
Confirmatory factor analysis results.
| Model | RMSEA | SRMR | CFI | IFI | NFI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three-factor model | 2.26 | 0.065 | 0.045 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.94 |
| Two-factor model a1 | 3.34 | 0.123 | 0.067 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.92 |
| Two-factor model b2 | 3.68 | 0.121 | 0.100 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.92 |
| Single-factor c3 | 4.53 | 0.194 | 0.130 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.86 |
n = 259; a1 merges identification and family business creativity into one potential factor; b2 combines identification and family business support as one potential factor; c3 attributes all projects to the same potential factor.
Related analysis results.
| Variables | Mean value | Standard deviation | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family business creativity | 3.43 | 0.78 | 1 | |||||||
| Family business support | 4.23 | 0.65 | 0.33 | 1 | ||||||
| Identification | 3.48 | 0.69 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 1 | |||||
| Industry type | 2.45 | 1.14 | 0.14 | −0.09 | −0.00 | 1 | ||||
| Employee title | 2.30 | 0.96 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.11 | 1 | |||
| Enterprise size | 2.12 | 1.15 | 0.14 | −0.00 | 0.11 | 0.22 | −0.02 | 1 | ||
| Working years | 2.48 | 0.87 | −0.16 | 0.17 | 0.09 | −0.01 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 1 | |
| Gender | 2.43 | 0.51 | 0.07 | −0.04 | −0.13 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 1 |
*p < 0.05;**p < 0.01;***p < 0.001.
Figure 2Relationship between identification and the creativity of family businesses.
Path coefficient and significance level between identification and creativity of family business.
| Path of action | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novelty ← identification | 0.567 | 0.080 | 5.116 |
|
| Feasibility ← identification | 0.432 | 0.074 | 5.207 |
|
* p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3Relationship between identification and family business support.
Path coefficients and significance levels between identification and family.
| Path of action | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotional support←Identification | 0.336 | 0.057 | 4.256 |
|
| Instrumental support←Identification | 0.221 | 0.062 | 3.485 |
|
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Intermediate model fitting index (before modification).
| Index | TLI | IFI | NFI | CFI | RMSEA | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 3.650 | 0.775 | 0.797 | 0.742 | 0.811 | 0.076 |
Figure 4Mediating role model (after revision).
Test results of the mediating role of family business support.
| Path of action | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novelty ← identification | −0.312 | 0.064 | −3.423 |
|
| Feasibility ← identification | −0.250 | 0.113 | −3.145 |
|
| Emotional support ← identification | 0.168 | 0.053 | 2.117 |
|
| Instrumental support ← identification | 0.138 | 0.050 | 3.133 |
|
| Novelty ← emotional support | −1.212 | 0.341 | −4.257 |
|
| Novelty ← instrumental support | 1.185 | 0.202 | 5.412 |
|
| Feasibility ← instrumental support | 1.315 | 0.335 | 5.655 |
|
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Hypothesis test results.
| Hypothesis | Hypothetical content | Test results |
|---|---|---|
| H1a | Identification is positively related to the novelty of creativity. | Supported |
| H1b | Identification is positively related to the feasibility of creativity. | Supported |
| H2a | Identification is positively related to emotional support. | Supported |
| H2b | Identification is positively related to instrumental support. | Supported |
| H3a | Emotional support is positively correlated with the novelty of creativity. | Unsupported |
| H3b | Emotional support is positively correlated with the feasibility of creativity. | Unsupported |
| H4a | Instrumental support is positively related to the novelty of creativity. | Supported |
| H4b | Instrumental support is positively related to the feasibility of creativity. | Supported |