| Literature DB >> 32140124 |
Inwon Kang1, Xue He1, Matthew Minsuk Shin2.
Abstract
Chinese consumers' lavish and collective spending on Korean luxury cosmetics brands is well documented. This study examines why this consumption behavior occurs, hypothesizing that it is driven by a "fear of missing out" (FoMO). In other words, in order to derive psychological comfort, consumers with high FoMO may be prone to developing high brand involvement, leading to their collective consumption of certain luxury brands. In consumer studies, such collective consumption behavior is referred to as herd behavior. Thus, the main research question of this study is, "why do Chinese consumers show herd consumption behavior toward certain luxury brands?" We propose that consumers who are attracted to luxury brands and possess high FoMO will develop higher brand involvement, leading to herd consumption behavior toward such brands. To validate this proposition, this study surveyed Chinese consumers. The collected data were analyzed using the structural equation modeling (SEM) method, conducted within SPSS and AMOS. The results provide theoretical explanations as to why Chinese consumers indulge in collective obsession-like stockpiling consumption toward certain luxury brands, as well as several managerial implications related to this behavior.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese consumer; Korean luxury cosmetics brand; emotional needs; fear of missing out; herd consumption behavior
Year: 2020 PMID: 32140124 PMCID: PMC7042405 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Prior research on herd behavior.
| Research | Antecedents | Field of study |
| Adaptation | Organizational psychology | |
| Identity signal; group similarity | Social psychology | |
| Peer pressure | Psychology | |
| Fear of missing out | Consumer behavior | |
| Physical/psychological ease | Consumer behavior | |
| Desire to minimize losses and maximize profits | Organizational psychology | |
| Desire to reduce risk in decision making | Psychology | |
| Peer learning experience | Consumer behavior | |
| Quality assurance | Consumer behavior | |
| Influences: networks; public opinion | Consumer behavior |
Internet use and dependency, by country.
| Percentage of respondents who cannot imagine life without the Internet | Number of Internet users, as of March 2019 (in millions) | Number of Internet users with high dependency (estimate) | |
| China | 77 | 829 | 638.33 |
| India | 82 | 560 | 459.2 |
| United States | 73 | 293 | 213.89 |
| Japan | 62 | 118 | 73.16 |
| Russia | 66 | 110 | 72.6 |
| Germany | 73 | 79 | 57.67 |
| United Kingdom | 78 | 63 | 49.14 |
| France | 64 | 60 | 38.4 |
| Italy | 62 | 55 | 34.1 |
FIGURE 1Research model.
Measurement items.
| Constructs | Measurement items | Source |
| Hedonic needs | I seek delightful experiences | |
| I seek exciting experiences | ||
| I seek thrilling experiences | ||
| Symbolic needs | I like to have my friends envy me | |
| I like to have experiences that I want to tell my friends about | ||
| I like to feel that I am in an exclusive environment | ||
| Self-esteem needs | I often have a strong need to be around people who are impressed with what I am like and what I do | |
| I mainly like to be around others who think I am an important person | ||
| I mainly like to be around others who think I am an exciting person | ||
| Recognition needs | It is important to me that other people see me as successful | |
| It is important to me that other people believe in me | ||
| It is important to me that other people like me | ||
| [Korean luxury cosmetic] Brand | [The Korean luxury cosmetic brand] is important to me | |
| involvement | [The Korean luxury cosmetic brand] is relevant to me | |
| [The Korean luxury cosmetic brand] means a lot to me | ||
| [The Korean luxury cosmetic brand] is significant to me | ||
| Informational herd behavior | To ensure that I buy the right brand, I often observe what others are buying and using | |
| If I have little experience with a brand, I often ask my friends about the brand | ||
| I frequently gather information from friends or family about a brand before I buy | ||
| Normative herd behavior | When buying products, I generally purchase those brands that I think others will approve of | |
| I achieve a sense of belonging by purchasing the same brands that others purchase | ||
| I like to know what brands and products make good impressions on others | ||
| Fear of missing out | I become worried when I find out my friends are having fun without me | |
| I become anxious when I do not know what brands are popular among my friends | ||
| It is important that I continue to keep in touch with what my friends are doing |
Demographic characteristics.
| Item | Characteristics | Frequency | Percentage |
| Gender | Male | 72 | 25.8 |
| Female | 207 | 74.2 | |
| Total | 279 | 100 | |
| Age | 19 and under | 36 | 12.9 |
| 20–29 | 121 | 43.4 | |
| 30–39 | 108 | 38.7 | |
| 40 and above | 14 | 5.0 | |
| Total | 279 | 100 | |
| Occupation | Students | 57 | 20.4 |
| Government employee | 76 | 27.2 | |
| Self-employed | 50 | 17.9 | |
| Private firm employee | 59 | 21.1 | |
| Others | 37 | 13.3 | |
| Total | 279 | 100 | |
| Locations | Beijing | 97 | 35 |
| Shanghai | 62 | 22 | |
| Tianjin | 58 | 20 | |
| Dalian | 43 | 15 | |
| Shenyang | 19 | 8 | |
| Total | 279 | 100 |
Correlations between constructs.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
| 1 | 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 0.018 | 1 | |||||
| 3 | 0.043 | –0.008 | 1 | ||||
| 4 | 0.144** | 0.019 | 0.178*** | 1 | |||
| 5 | 0.165*** | 0.111* | 0.305*** | 0.441*** | 1 | ||
| 6 | 0.069 | 0.034 | 0.187*** | 0.097 | 0.145** | 1 | |
| 7 | 0.088 | 0.075 | 0.224*** | 0.227*** | 0.189*** | 0.182*** | 1 |
| Mean | 2.853 | 2.994 | 3.634 | 3.783 | 3.901 | 3.912 | 3.754 |
| SD | 0.937 | 0.981 | 0.821 | 0.785 | 0.756 | 0.979 | 0.828 |
CFA results.
| Constructs | Items | Factor loading | SEa | Std. loading | CRb | AVEc | |
| Hedonic needs | HED1 | 1.000 | – | 0.781 | – | 0.900 | 0.749 |
| HED2 | 0.959 | 0.058 | 0.707 | 16.554 | |||
| HED3 | 1.010 | 0.063 | 0.671 | 16.111 | |||
| Symbolic needs | SYM1 | 1.000 | – | 0.840 | 0.889 | 0.728 | |
| SYM 2 | 0.922 | 0.054 | 0.805 | 17.102 | |||
| SYM 3 | 0.910 | 0.053 | 0.806 | 17.103 | |||
| Self-esteem needs | SEL1 | 1.000 | – | 0.815 | – | 0.933 | 0.824 |
| SEL2 | 0.936 | 0.057 | 0.812 | 16.341 | |||
| SEL3 | 0.859 | 0.053 | 0.805 | 17.786 | |||
| Recognition needs | REC1 | 1.000 | – | 0.689 | – | 0.907 | 0.765 |
| REC2 | 1.161 | 0.081 | 0.745 | 14.408 | |||
| REC3 | 1.228 | 0.083 | 0.779 | 14.859 | |||
| (Korean luxury cosmetic) brand involvement | INV1 | 1.000 | – | 0.734 | – | 0.949 | 0.822 |
| INV2 | 1.114 | 0.062 | 0.721 | 18.017 | |||
| INV3 | 1.051 | 0.051 | 0.815 | 20.565 | |||
| INV4 | 1.059 | 0.050 | 0.738 | 20.998 | |||
| Informational herd behavior | IHB1 | 1.000 | – | 0.878 | – | 0.953 | 0.872 |
| IHB 2 | 0.991 | 0.039 | 0.874 | 25.282 | |||
| IHB 3 | 1.116 | 0.037 | 0.918 | 30.040 | |||
| Normative herd behavior | NHB1 | 1.000 | – | 0.806 | – | 0.919 | 0.790 |
| NHB2 | 0.973 | 0.057 | 0.790 | 17.067 | |||
| NHB3 | 1.063 | 0.061 | 0.781 | 17.571 |
Statistical summary of model fit.
| Model goodness of fit indices | Recommended value | Results in this study |
| Chi-squared/degree of freedom | ≤3 | 1.28 |
| Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) | ≥0.90 | 0.925 |
| Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) | ≥0.80 | 0.903 |
| Normalized Fit Index (NFI) | ≥0.90 | 0.942 |
| Comparative Fit Index (CFI) | ≥0.90 | 0.987 |
| Incremental Fit Index (IFI) | ≥0.90 | 0.957 |
| Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation (RMSEA) | 0.05–0.08 | 0.050 |
FIGURE 2Relationships between constructs. ∗∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗p < 0.05, ∗p < 0.1.
Hypotheses test results.
| Hypothesis | Coefficient | Result | |
| H1 | Hedonic needs – Brand involvement | 0.096* | Supported |
| H2 | Symbolic needs – Brand involvement | 0.103* | Supported |
| H3 | Self-esteem needs – Brand involvement | 0.232*** | Supported |
| H4 | Recognition needs – Brand involvement | 0.419*** | Supported |
| H5 | Brand involvement – Informational herd behavior | 0.146** | Supported |
| H6 | Brand involvement – Normative herd behavior | 0.216*** | Supported |
Multi-group results according to FoMO.
| Equality Constraint Model: | |||||
| Path | Δ | Cross-group path coefficient | Result | ||
| Non-constraint Model | High group | Low group | |||
| Hedonic needs – Brand involvement | 531.661 | 0.027 | 0.137 | 0.111* | Not supported |
| Symbolic needs – Brand involvement | 532.155 | 0.521 | 0.182* | 0.076 | Not supported |
| Self-esteem needs – Brand involvement | 535.647 | 4.013 | 0.449*** | 0.210*** | Supported |
| Recognition needs – Brand involvement | 536.273 | 4.612 | 0.606*** | 0.378*** | Supported |