| Literature DB >> 36246639 |
Lin Yang1,2, Yan Xu3,4, Jun Xia1,2, Huijuan Yan2, Chenhui Ding3,4, Qianyu Shi2, Yujing Wu2, Ping Liu2, Jiafu Pan3,4, Yanhong Zeng3,4, Yanyan Zhang2, Fang Chen2, Hui Jiang2, Yanwen Xu3,4, Wei Li5,6, Canquan Zhou3,4, Ya Gao2,7.
Abstract
Background: Preimplantation genetic test for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) has been used to select genetic disease-free embryos for implantation during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. However, embryos tested by PGT-M have risks of harboring chromosomal aneuploidy. Hence, a universal method to detect monogenic diseases and genomic imbalances is required.Entities:
Keywords: IVF; PGT-A/M; TAGs-seq; chromosome abnormality; monogenic disease
Year: 2022 PMID: 36246639 PMCID: PMC9559864 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.976131
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
FIGURE 1Overview of the TAGs-seq workflow for PGT-A and PGT-M. The gDNA products were extracted from the blood samples of the trio family, while the MDA product was prepared from a few (6–8) trophectoderm cells of an embryo. Then the TAGs-seq library preparation and pooling were performed, followed by the sequencing on DNBSEQ-G400 platform. The monogenic disorders and genomic imbalances were analyzed by an in-house pipeline. Finally, a healthy embryo was selected to transfer according to the result of PGT-A/M.
FIGURE 2The performance of TAGs-seq in GM03918 cell line. (A) Experiment design of the TAGs-seq in GM03918 cell line. Bulk cells gDNA and multiple displacement amplification (MDA) product of the 3-5 isolated cells were prepared, which were then tested by ∼30× whole genome sequencing (WGS) and 0.1–0.5 × TAGs-seq (4 technical replicates), respectively. (B) Distribution of MAR of homozygous and heterozygous sites in gDNA and MDA products by the TAGs-seq and WGS. We define homozygous site which MAR lower than 10% and heterozygous sites which MAR equal or higher than 10%. MAR ratio was defined as the ratio of mean MAR of TAGs-seq data over mean MAR of ∼30xWGS data. (C) Coefficient of variation of copy ratio on all chromosomes. The interquartile range (IQR) of the copy ratio was quantified, and the data between Q1−1.5 × IQR and Q3+1.5 × IQR were selected whereas the outliers were excluded. (D) Copy ratio of TAGs-seq and WGS in gDNA and MDA products at the low sequencing depth (0.1×) of NGS, normalized to 9 million raw reads per sample.
FIGURE 3(A) TAGs-seq validation in clinical family sample. (B) Flowchart of analysis cohort of TAGs-seq samples. A total of 56 embryos were tested by TAGs-seq for PGT-A&M. The sequences data of 2 embryos were not sufficient quality due to the amplification failure. 29, 10 and 15 embryos were identified as carrier, affected and unaffected by PGT-M analysis. 17 and 37 embryos were identified with genomic imbalances and normal by the PGT-A analysis.
FIGURE 4The results of TAGs-seq for family 5. (A) Pedigrees of the family with HBB. Filled symbols represent affected individuals; half-filled symbols represent carrier; open symbols represent normal individuals. Circles and squares indicate females and males, respectively. (B) CNVs of the embryos at the low sequencing depth (0.25–0.46×) of TAGs-seq. Significant genomic imbalance was identified in embryos E8 (monosomy 13); E1, E2, E3, E4 and E6 did not identify genomic imbalance; A deletion was found in E5 (19q13.33-19q13.43,8.55M) and E7 (1q21.1-1q44,103.70M); A duplication was found in E5 (19q13.11-19q13.33,17.51M); (C) Direct detection the targeted mutation site in the HBB gene of the father (F), the mother (M), the proband child(P) and 8 embryos (E1–E8) by TAGs-seq. E1, E4, E7 had one heterozygous mutated SNV (red), E2, E3, E6 had one homozygous mutated SNV and E5, 8 had no mutated SNV. The fraction of reads of the covered region shown in green is consistent with the reference genome. (D) Genotype of parents and embryos of the HBB gene plus 37 SNPs closely associated with the mutation. M1 and F1 were defined as maternal haplotype 1 and paternal haplotype 1, respectively; meanwhile M2 and F2 stands for the maternal haplotype 2 and paternal haplotype 2, respectively. Red star, mutation; green/purple/blue/orange/grey, no mutation.