Literature DB >> 33422393

How Does Conversion Total Hip Arthroplasty Compare to Primary?

Scott J Douglas1, Ethan A Remily1, Oliver C Sax1, Sahir S Pervaiz1, Ronald E Delanois1, Aaron J Johnson2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent institutional evidence suggests that conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) incurs higher complication rates and costs when compared to primary THA. These findings contrast with the current reimbursement system as conversion and primary THAs are classified under the same diagnosis-related group. Thus, a national all-payer database was utilized to compare complication rates up to 2 years, 30-day readmission rates, and 90-day costs between conversion THA and matched primary THA patients.
METHODS: A retrospective review of the PearlDiver database between 2010 and second quarter of 2018 was performed using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to compare conversion THA (CPT 27132) to primary THA (CPT 27130). Patients were matched at a 1:3 ratio based on age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, body mass index, tobacco use, and diabetes (conversion = 8369; primary = 25,081 patients).
RESULTS: Conversion THA had higher rates of periprosthetic joint infections (conversion: 7.7% vs primary: 1.4%), hip dislocations (4.5% vs 2.0%), blood transfusions (2.0% vs 1.0%), mechanical complications (5.5% vs 1.0%), and revision surgeries (4.0% vs 1.5%) (P < .001 for all) by 90 days. The 30-day readmission rate for conversion THA was significantly higher compared to the primary group (7.3% vs 3.3%) (P < .001). Median cost at 90 days for conversion THA was significantly higher compared to primary THA ($18,800 vs $13,611, P < .001).
CONCLUSION: This study revealed increased complication rates, revisions, readmissions, and costs among conversion THA patients compared to matched primary THA patients. These results support the reclassification of conversion into a diagnosis-related group separate from primary THA.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  conversion; conversion total hip; cost; infection; primary total hip; total hip arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 33422393     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of Differences in Complications and Revision After Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty from Plating vs. Nailing vs. Hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Senthil Sambandam; Varatharaj Mounasamy; Dane Wukich
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2022-09

2.  Outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty using 3D image-based custom stems in unselected patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  A Nogier; I Tourabaly; S Ramos-Pascual; J H Müller; M Saffarini; C Courtin
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-12-10

3.  High Charlson Comorbidity Index Score is associated with early fracture-related complication for internal fixation of neck of femur fractures.

Authors:  Ronald Man Yeung Wong; Yao Zu; Wai Wang Chau; Chi Yin Tso; Wing Hong Liu; Raymond Wai Kit Ng; Simon Kwoon Ho Chow; Wing Hoi Cheung; Ning Tang; Kevin Ki Wai Ho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.