Aris I Giotakis1, Gerlig Widmann2, Erik Mallien3, Felix Riechelmann4, Helen Heppt3, Herbert Riechelmann3. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. arisgiotakis@gmail.com. 2. Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. 3. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstrasse 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. 4. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The anterior nose is the nasal segment with the highest resistance to airflow. In a hospital-based case-control study, we compared cross-sectional areas of the nasal cavities anterior to the piriform aperture determined by computed tomography (CT-CSA) in patients with nasal obstruction (cases) and unselected patients with trauma unrelated to the head and face (controls). METHODS: CT-CSA could be reproducibly identified at angles of 0o, 30°, 60°, and 90° to the nasal floor approximately perpendicular to the arcuate direction of nasal airflow using bony landmarks. CT-CSA were manually segmented and compared in cases and controls. In cases, we compared CT-CSA at 30° (CT-CSA30-narrow) with the minimum cross-sectional area determined by acoustic rhinometry (AR-MCA1-narrow), each on the narrower side. RESULTS: CT-CSA ranged from 7 to 250 mm2 with an average of 100 mm2 per nasal side. Side differences of the nasal airways indicating asymmetry of the nasal airways were greater in 40 cases than in 44 controls (p < 0.003). Moreover, bilateral CT-CSA were significantly smaller in cases than in controls (p < 0.001). CT-CSA30-narrow did not significantly correlate with AR-MCA1-narrow (r = 0.33; p = 0.07) and on average was 58% smaller than AR-MCA1-narrow. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional areas of the anterior nose perpendicular to the direction of nasal airflow, which is considered relevant in terms of flow physics, can be reliably measured using CT. Anterior nasal cavities in patients with nasal obstruction were more asymmetric and, as a whole, narrower than in controls, the latter of which is not corrected by routine septoplasty.
PURPOSE: The anterior nose is the nasal segment with the highest resistance to airflow. In a hospital-based case-control study, we compared cross-sectional areas of the nasal cavities anterior to the piriform aperture determined by computed tomography (CT-CSA) in patients with nasal obstruction (cases) and unselected patients with trauma unrelated to the head and face (controls). METHODS: CT-CSA could be reproducibly identified at angles of 0o, 30°, 60°, and 90° to the nasal floor approximately perpendicular to the arcuate direction of nasal airflow using bony landmarks. CT-CSA were manually segmented and compared in cases and controls. In cases, we compared CT-CSA at 30° (CT-CSA30-narrow) with the minimum cross-sectional area determined by acoustic rhinometry (AR-MCA1-narrow), each on the narrower side. RESULTS: CT-CSA ranged from 7 to 250 mm2 with an average of 100 mm2 per nasal side. Side differences of the nasal airways indicating asymmetry of the nasal airways were greater in 40 cases than in 44 controls (p < 0.003). Moreover, bilateral CT-CSA were significantly smaller in cases than in controls (p < 0.001). CT-CSA30-narrow did not significantly correlate with AR-MCA1-narrow (r = 0.33; p = 0.07) and on average was 58% smaller than AR-MCA1-narrow. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sectional areas of the anterior nose perpendicular to the direction of nasal airflow, which is considered relevant in terms of flow physics, can be reliably measured using CT. Anterior nasal cavities in patients with nasal obstruction were more asymmetric and, as a whole, narrower than in controls, the latter of which is not corrected by routine septoplasty.
Authors: Azadeh A T Borojeni; Guilherme J M Garcia; Masoud Gh Moghaddam; Dennis O Frank-Ito; Julia S Kimbell; Purushottam W Laud; Lisa J Koenig; John S Rhee Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-07-02 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Ahmad R Sedaghat; David A Kieff; Regan W Bergmark; Mary E Cunnane; Nicolas Y Busaba Journal: Int Forum Allergy Rhinol Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 3.858
Authors: Aristeidis I Giotakis; Peter Valentin Tomazic; Herbert Riechelmann; Julia Vent Journal: Facial Plast Surg Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 1.446
Authors: Farhad Ardeshirpour; Kate E McCarn; Alexander M McKinney; Rick M Odland; Bevan Yueh; Peter A Hilger Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Herbert Riechelmann; Gerlig Widmann; Barbara Kofler; Roman Arminger; Christoph Url; Aris I Giotakis Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 1.895