Herbert Riechelmann1, Gerlig Widmann2, Barbara Kofler3, Roman Arminger4, Christoph Url3, Aris I Giotakis5. 1. Department Head, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 2. Private Dozent Consultant, Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 3. Consultant, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 4. Medical Student, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. 5. Consultant, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: arisgiotakis@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The role of morphologic characteristics of the nasal cavity in nasal obstruction is not yet sufficiently understood. The aim of this study was to determine which morphometric parameters of the nasal cavity severely impair nasal breathing and when. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a hospital-based, computed tomography-morphometric cross-sectional study, we evaluated computed tomography coronal scans of patients with known nasal obstruction scheduled to undergo functional nasal surgical procedures (cases) and trauma patients without facial involvement or known nasal obstruction (controls). The primary predictor variable was case versus control. In both groups, we measured and compared the piriform aperture width; nasal floor canting; piriform aperture vertical height, height-width ratio, and total cross-sectional area; height difference between the right and left nasal floors; and nasal septal thickness; as well as age and gender differences. Metric data means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 60 patients evenly divided between cases and controls. Of these, 30 were men. The average age of the cases and controls was 27.4 ± 7.8 years and 38.5 ± 18.6 years, respectively (P < .001). The differences in piriform aperture width were not statistically significant between cases and controls (23.3 ± 1.9 mm and 23.8 ± 1.7 mm, respectively; P > .2). In contrast, we noted statistically significant differences between cases and controls in nasal floor canting (5.4° ± 4.6° and 1.8° ± 1.5°, respectively; P < .001) and height difference between the right and left nasal floors (1.8 ± 1.2 mm and 1.0 ± 0.7 mm, respectively; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal floor canting of 3° or greater and a height difference between the right and left nasal floors of 1.5 mm or greater may contribute to the etiology of clinically relevant nasal obstruction. A piriform aperture width of 22 mm or less may be considered narrow. Future studies can determine when and how exactly to surgically address a clinically relevant narrow piriform aperture and nasal floor canting.
PURPOSE: The role of morphologic characteristics of the nasal cavity in nasal obstruction is not yet sufficiently understood. The aim of this study was to determine which morphometric parameters of the nasal cavity severely impair nasal breathing and when. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a hospital-based, computed tomography-morphometric cross-sectional study, we evaluated computed tomography coronal scans of patients with known nasal obstruction scheduled to undergo functional nasal surgical procedures (cases) and traumapatients without facial involvement or known nasal obstruction (controls). The primary predictor variable was case versus control. In both groups, we measured and compared the piriform aperture width; nasal floor canting; piriform aperture vertical height, height-width ratio, and total cross-sectional area; height difference between the right and left nasal floors; and nasal septal thickness; as well as age and gender differences. Metric data means, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and analyzed. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 60 patients evenly divided between cases and controls. Of these, 30 were men. The average age of the cases and controls was 27.4 ± 7.8 years and 38.5 ± 18.6 years, respectively (P < .001). The differences in piriform aperture width were not statistically significant between cases and controls (23.3 ± 1.9 mm and 23.8 ± 1.7 mm, respectively; P > .2). In contrast, we noted statistically significant differences between cases and controls in nasal floor canting (5.4° ± 4.6° and 1.8° ± 1.5°, respectively; P < .001) and height difference between the right and left nasal floors (1.8 ± 1.2 mm and 1.0 ± 0.7 mm, respectively; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Nasal floor canting of 3° or greater and a height difference between the right and left nasal floors of 1.5 mm or greater may contribute to the etiology of clinically relevant nasal obstruction. A piriform aperture width of 22 mm or less may be considered narrow. Future studies can determine when and how exactly to surgically address a clinically relevant narrow piriform aperture and nasal floor canting.
Authors: Aris I Giotakis; Gerlig Widmann; Erik Mallien; Felix Riechelmann; Helen Heppt; Herbert Riechelmann Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2022-10-15 Impact factor: 3.236