| Literature DB >> 36242054 |
Yuan-Guo Xie1, Zhen-Hao Luo2, Bao-Zhu Fang3, Jian-Yu Jiao2, Qi-Jun Xie1, Xing-Ru Cao1, Yan-Ni Qu2, Yan-Lin Qi1, Yang-Zhi Rao2, Yu-Xian Li1, Yong-Hong Liu3, Andrew Li1, Cale Seymour4, Marike Palmer4, Brian P Hedlund4,5, Wen-Jun Li6,7, Zheng-Shuang Hua8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Candidatus Nanohaloarchaeota, an archaeal phylum within the DPANN superphylum, is characterized by limited metabolic capabilities and limited phylogenetic diversity and until recently has been considered to exclusively inhabit hypersaline environments due to an obligate association with Halobacteria. Aside from hypersaline environments, Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota can also have been discovered from deep-subsurface marine sediments.Entities:
Keywords: Cadidatus Nanohaloarchaeota; Environmental adaptations; Functional differentiation; Metabolism
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36242054 PMCID: PMC9563170 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-022-01376-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 16.837
Fig. 1The reconstructed genomes of novel Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota. a Relative abundance of the major microbial groups in eight layers of a stratified salt crust and underlying water based on amplicon sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. b Relative abundances of the three Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota MAGs recovered from the present study. c Phylogenetic placements of the novel Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota MAGs. The tree was constructed based on the concatenated alignment of 16 ribosomal proteins using IQ-TREE with the best model of LG + F + R9. Bootstrap values were based on 1000 replicates, and nodes with confidence > 70% are indicated as black circles
Genomic features of Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota MAGs reconstructed from the Qi Jiao Jing Lake
| Bin_ID | QJJ-5_bin.20 | QJJ-7_bin.66 | QJJ-9_bin.46 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Genome size (bp) | 701,335 | 753,270 | 625,082 |
| No. of scaffolds | 48 | 34 | 34 |
| N50 | 23,342 | 30,141 | 22,555 |
| GC | 50.5 | 52.4 | 43.9 |
| Coding density (%) | 93.4 | 92.4 | 92.3 |
| Predicted genes | 846 | 889 | 753 |
| No. of genes annotated by KO | 375 | 373 | 339 |
| No. of genes annotated by COG | 194 | 217 | 196 |
| No. of tRNAs | 27 | 33 | 33 |
| Completeness (%)a | 87.5 | 95.8 | 89.6 |
| Contaminationb | 0.07 | 0.93 | 0 |
aThe genome completeness of each MAG was calculated as the occurrence frequency of 48 single-copy genes (see Additional file 1: Table S1)
bThe contamination for each MAG was evaluated using CheckM (see “Materials and methods”)
Fig. 2Overview of metabolic potentials in three new Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota MAGs. Genes related to glycolysis, AMP metabolism, TCA cycle, pyruvate metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, protein degradation, membrane transporters, and pili are shown. Red solid circles represent genes present in QJJ-5_bin.20. Blue solid circles represent genes present in QJJ-7_bin.66. Purple solid circles represent genes present in QJJ-9_bin.46. Green solid circles represent genes present in at least one of the two NHA MAGs. Hollow circles represent structures where not all protein subunits are present in the genome. Abbreviations: G1P, glucose 1-phosphate; G6P, glucose 6-phosphate; F6P, fructose 6-phosphate; F1,6P2, fructose 1,6-bisphosphate; G3P, glyceraldehyde-3p; 3PG, glycerate-3-phosphate; 2PG, glycerate-2-phosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; Oxa, oxaloacetate; Cit, citrate; Iso, isocitrate; 2-Oxo, 2-oxo-glutarate; Succ-CoA, succinate-CoA; Succ, succinate; Fum, fumarate; Mal, malate; NMP, nucleoside 5′-monophosphate; R1,5P, ribose-1,5-bisphosphate; RuBP, ribulose-1,5-disphosphate; MFS, major facilitator superfamily permease; 5,10-CH = THF, 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate; Carbamoyl-P, carbamoyl phosphate; phosphoserine, 3-phospho-L-serine
Fig. 3Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of RbcL proteins using IQ-TREE with the best model of LG + F + R10. a Overview of RbcL proteins phylogeny with groups indicated. b and c Detailed phylogeny of two different clades of RbcL proteins found in Nucleotidisoterales; red highlights represent the Nucleotidisoterales MAGs. QJJ-9_bin45, QJJ-9_bin.161, QJJ-8_bin.5, and QJJ-5_bin.106 represent medium- or low-quality MAGs of Nucleotidisoterales reconstructed from the same metagenomic datasets and thus not described in the main text. Bootstrap values were based on 1000 replicates, and nodes with percentages > 70% are indicated as black circles
Fig. 4Genomic differences between Nucleotidisoterales and Nanohydrothermales. Five MAGs from Nucleotidisoterales and three MAGs from Nanohydrothermales are taken into consideration for comparative genomics. a The isoelectric points (pIs) of the proteins of MAGs from the two orders (see “Materials and methods” for detailed calculation of pI). b Amino acid usage of MAGs, as well as thermophilic Ca. Aenigmarchaeota. c The Venn diagram indicates differences between the two orders at the KO level. d Isoelectric points of Nucleotidisoterales-unique proteins. e Isoelectric points of Nanohydrothermales-unique proteins. f Isoelectric points of proteins shared between Nucleotidisoterales and Nanohydrothermales. g Functional distribution of acidic amino acids at the KEGG category level. Blue bars represent unique genes of Nucleotidisoterales. Light blue bars represent shared genes of Nucleotidisoterales. Red bars represent shared genes of Nanohydrothermales
Fig. 5Evolutionary history reconstruction regarding carbohydrate metabolism and nucleotide salvage pathway in Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota. a The inferred gain and loss events related to carbohydrate metabolism and nucleotide salvage pathway in Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota. b The presence and absence of genes in each Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota MAG. Originations indicate either de novo gene birth events or inter-phylum HGTs. NHA represents Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota archaeon NHA-2 and Ca. Nanohaloarchaeota archaeon NHA-4