Berihun Assefa Dachew1, Gizachew A Tessema2,3, Rosa Alati2,4. 1. School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. berihun.dachew@curtin.edu.au. 2. School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Australia. 3. School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 4. Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Existing evidence on the relationship between mode of delivery and offspring emotional and behavioural problems, especially in older age groups, is limited and inconsistent. This study aimed to examine the association between obstetric mode of delivery and emotional and behavioural problems in offspring aged 3-16 years. METHODS: The sample for this study comprised participants in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the United Kingdom. The study cohort ranged from 7074 (at 3 years of age) to 4071 (at 16 years of age) mother-offspring pairs. Data on obstetric mode of delivery were abstracted from obstetric records by trained research midwives and classified as spontaneous vaginal delivery, assisted vaginal delivery and caesarean delivery (elective and emergency). Offspring emotional and behavioural problems were measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) when the child was 3, 7, 9, 11, and 16 years. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations. RESULTS: Assisted vaginal delivery was associated with an increased risk of emotional problems at age 11 years (OR = 1.42; 95% CI 1.11-1.81). No significant associations were observed at ages 3, 7, 9 and 16. We found no evidence of associations between caesarean delivery (elective or emergency) and emotional and behavioural measures in offspring across all age groups. CONCLUSION: Mode of delivery does not appear to be associated with emotional and behavioural problems in children and adolescents. Further research is needed to understand the potential longer-term effects of assisted vaginal deliveries on offspring emotional development.
PURPOSE: Existing evidence on the relationship between mode of delivery and offspring emotional and behavioural problems, especially in older age groups, is limited and inconsistent. This study aimed to examine the association between obstetric mode of delivery and emotional and behavioural problems in offspring aged 3-16 years. METHODS: The sample for this study comprised participants in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) in the United Kingdom. The study cohort ranged from 7074 (at 3 years of age) to 4071 (at 16 years of age) mother-offspring pairs. Data on obstetric mode of delivery were abstracted from obstetric records by trained research midwives and classified as spontaneous vaginal delivery, assisted vaginal delivery and caesarean delivery (elective and emergency). Offspring emotional and behavioural problems were measured using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) when the child was 3, 7, 9, 11, and 16 years. Logistic regression analyses were used to examine associations. RESULTS: Assisted vaginal delivery was associated with an increased risk of emotional problems at age 11 years (OR = 1.42; 95% CI 1.11-1.81). No significant associations were observed at ages 3, 7, 9 and 16. We found no evidence of associations between caesarean delivery (elective or emergency) and emotional and behavioural measures in offspring across all age groups. CONCLUSION: Mode of delivery does not appear to be associated with emotional and behavioural problems in children and adolescents. Further research is needed to understand the potential longer-term effects of assisted vaginal deliveries on offspring emotional development.
Authors: Ties Boerma; Carine Ronsmans; Dessalegn Y Melesse; Aluisio J D Barros; Fernando C Barros; Liang Juan; Ann-Beth Moller; Lale Say; Ahmad Reza Hosseinpoor; Mu Yi; Dácio de Lyra Rabello Neto; Marleen Temmerman Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-10-13 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Ana Pilar Betran; Maria Regina Torloni; Jun Zhang; Jiangfeng Ye; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Catherine Deneux-Tharaux; Olufemi Taiwo Oladapo; João Paulo Souza; Özge Tunçalp; Joshua Peter Vogel; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu Journal: Reprod Health Date: 2015-06-21 Impact factor: 3.223
Authors: Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak; Jacek Krzysztof Szymański; Michał Ciebiera; Beata Sarecka-Hujar; Grzegorz Jakiel Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 3.390