| Literature DB >> 36238872 |
Junghoon Kim, Jeong Ah Ryu, Juhan Lee.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to apply MR elastography (MRE) to achieve in vivo evaluation of the elastic properties of thigh muscles and validate the feasibility of quantifying the elasticity of normal thigh muscles using MRE. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: Elasticity Imaging; Magnetic Resonance Elastography; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Mechanical Properties; Skeletal Muscle; Thigh
Year: 2021 PMID: 36238872 PMCID: PMC9431979 DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2020.0133
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi ISSN: 1738-2637
Fig. 1Setup for MR elastography acquisition in the 3T MRI system
A. Subjects are placed in the supine position on the table to characterize thigh muscles (vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, adductor magnus, and biceps femoris). The pneumatic driver (arrow) is attached to the posterior thigh and secured with straps.
B. The pneumatic transducer is used to produce 60 Hz mechanical wave.
Fig. 2Estimation of shear stiffness of thigh muscles on MR elastography scans
After identifying the exact locations of muscles to be measured at anatomical magnitude images, freehand ROIs are drawn, and the same ROI is simultaneously defined in the same areas along the muscles on the stiffness map. Finally, the shear stiffness is estimated automatically from the stiffness map. Unreliable pixels on the confidence-area-overlapped stiffness maps are easily identified as excluded pixels (checkered pattern), and the results show the number of included pixels and excluded pixels in the ROIs.
A. Wave images.
B. Anatomical magnitude image.
C. Stiffness map with overlapped confidence area.
D. Estimated shear stiffness.
ROI = region of interest
Estimated Shear Stiffness Values of the Four Thigh Muscles at Rest in the Study Subjects
| Sex | Age (Years) | BMI | Estimated Shear Stiffness (kPa) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reader 1 | Reader 2 | |||||||||
| VM | VL | AM | BF | VM | VL | AM | BF | |||
| Female | 23 | 21.3 | 0.63 | 1.13 | 1.81 | 1.84 | 0.54 | 1.13 | 2.09 | 1.59 |
| Female | 23 | 26.7 | 1.05 | 1.31 | 0.76 | 1.12 | 1.07 | 1.26 | 0.71 | 1.05 |
| Female | 24 | 32.7 | 1.55 | 2.07 | 1.15 | 1.34 | 1.50 | 2.02 | 1.28 | 1.36 |
| Male | 25 | 20.6 | 1.37 | 1.65 | 1.41 | 0.95 | 1.40 | 1.56 | 1.16 | 0.96 |
| Female | 29 | 18.7 | 1.09 | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1.15 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 0.63 |
| Male | 33 | 29.9 | 0.81 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.89 |
| Female | 40 | 20.5 | 0.89 | 0.64 | 0.67 | 0.78 | 1.11 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.74 |
| Female | 40 | 20.0 | 0.52 | 0.70 | 0.52 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.68 | 0.56 | 0.54 |
| Female | 43 | 20.6 | 1.08 | 0.88 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 1.12 | 0.86 | 0.66 | 0.77 |
| Male | 45 | 26.6 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.91 | 0.76 | 0.82 | 0.61 | 0.91 |
| Mean ± SD | 0.98 ± 0.32 | 1.10 ± 0.46 | 0.91 ± 0.41 | 0.99 ± 0.37 | 0.98 ± 0.32 | 1.10 ± 0.46 | 0.91 ± 0.41 | 0.99 ± 0.37 | ||
AM = adductor magnus, BF = biceps femoris, BMI = body mass index, SD = standard deviation, VL = vastus lateralis, VM = vastus medialis
Comparison of Shear Stiffness Values of Muscles Based on Sex
| Thigh Muscles | Reader 1 | Reader 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean Stiffness (kPa) |
| Mean Stiffness (kPa) |
| |||
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |||
| VM | 0.98 ± 0.34 | 0.97 ± 0.34 | 1.000 | 0.91 ± 0.45 | 1.00 ± 0.48 | 1.000 |
| VL | 1.13 ± 0.46 | 1.08 ± 0.49 | 0.833 | 1.04 ± 0.46 | 1.06 ± 0.48 | 0.667 |
| AM | 0.95 ± 0.40 | 0.90 ± 0.45 | 0.667 | 0.89 ± 0.30 | 0.95 ± 0.56 | 1.000 |
| BF | 0.93 ± 0.02 | 1.01 ± 0.46 | 0.833 | 0.80 ± 0.23 | 0.95 ± 0.39 | 0.833 |
Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
*Comparison of stiffness values between sexes by reader 1 using the Mann-Whitney U test.
†Comparison of stiffness values between sexes by reader 2 using the Mann-Whitney U test.
AM = adductor magnus, BF = biceps femoris, VL = vastus lateralis, VM = vastus medialis
Estimated Correlation Coefficients between Shear Stiffness and Age
| Reader 1 | Reader 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Correlation Coefficient ( |
| Correlation Coefficient ( |
| |
| VM | -0.448 | 0.194 | -0.328 | 0.355 |
| VL | -0.728 | 0.017 | -0.685 | 0.029 |
| AM | -0.709 | 0.022 | -0.658 | 0.039 |
| BF | -0.651 | 0.041 | -0.645 | 0.044 |
Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
*Pearson's correlation coefficient between stiffness values of muscle and age by reader 1.
†Pearson's correlation coefficient between stiffness values of muscle and age by reader 2.
AM = adductor magnus, BF = biceps femoris, VL = vastus lateralis, VM = vastus medialis