| Literature DB >> 36238818 |
Jinkuk Hong1, Robert S Dembo1, Leann Smith DaWalt1, Murray Brilliant1, Elizabeth M Berry-Kravis2, Marsha Mailick1.
Abstract
Using longitudinal data, the present study examined the association between college degree attainment and the manifestation of neurodegenerative symptoms among women (n = 93) at elevated genetic risk. The neurodegenerative symptoms investigated in this study are due to FXTAS (Fragile X-associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome), a condition with onset after age 50. Those at risk for FXTAS have a mutation of a single gene found on the X chromosome. FXTAS is characterized by intention tremor, gait ataxia, executive function deficits, memory issues, and neuropathy. College degree attainment has been shown to provide neuroprotective effects in the general population, delaying the development of neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's disease. For this reason, college degree attainment is a potentially salient resource for those at risk of FXTAS. The results of the present research indicated significantly more severe FXTAS symptoms in women who did not attain a college degree as compared with those who were college graduates, although the two groups were similar in age, genetic risk, household income, health behaviors, and general health problems. Furthermore, symptoms in those who did not attain a college degree worsened over the 9-year study period at a significantly faster rate than the college graduates. The association between college degree attainment and FXTAS symptoms was significantly mediated by depression, which was lower among the graduates than those who did not attain a college degree. Thus, the present research is an example of how a sociodemographic factor can mitigate neurodegenerative conditions in genetically at-risk adults.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36238818 PMCID: PMC9550653 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: SSM Popul Health ISSN: 2352-8273
Comparison of demographic characteristics and study variables by college degree attainment.
| Total (N = 93) | without a college degree (n = 33, [35.5%]) | with a college degree (n = 60, [64.5%]) | t-score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age at Time 5 | 60.8 (7.1) [47, 79] | 60.3 (7.6) [47, 79] | 61.1 (6.8) [47, 78] | 0.53 |
| CGG repeat length | 95.0 (16.8) [67, 138] | 94.1 (17.5) [69, 138] | 95.5 (16.7) [67, 134] | 0.40 |
| Household income (Median) | $90,000 | $86,000 | $93,000 | 1.15 |
| General health problems | 2.2 (1.8) [0, 7] | 2.7 (2.2) [0, 7] | 2.0 (1.6) [0, 7] | −1.72 |
| Number of drinks a week | 2.4 (2.9) [0, 14] | 2.1 (2.8) [0, 10] | 2.5 (2.9) [0, 14] | 0.77 |
| Years of smoking | 5.0 (9.9) [0, 45] | 7.1 (12.0) [0, 45] | 3.7 (8.3) [0, 33] | −1.58 |
| Depressive symptoms | 11.2 (9.1) [0, 39] | 16.1 (11.3) [2, 39] | 8.5 (6.3) [0, 23] | −4.20*** |
| Anxiety | 9.0 (5.7) [1, 29] | 11.1 (7.0) [1, 29] | 7.8 (4.5) [2, 23] | −2.78** |
Note. Except for “household income,” means are presented with standard deviation in parentheses and the range in brackets. For “household income” the sample medians are reported with the continuity corrected chi-squared statistics from a 2-sample test on the equality of median presented at the t-value column. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
FXTAS-type symptom scores at each wave by college degree attainment.
| without a college degree | with a college degree | F-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time 2 | 3.19 (3.5) [0, 11] | 1.45 (2.0) [0, 9] | 4.72* |
| Time 3 | 3.83 (4.4) [0, 19] | 1.63 (1.9) [0, 7] | 7.81** |
| Time 4 | 3.91 (3.9) [0, 14] | 2.07 (2.1) [0, 11] | 5.07* |
| Time 5 | 6.47 (6.2) [0, 21] | 2.59 (2.5) [0, 9] | 12.2*** |
Note. Means are presented with standard deviation in parentheses and the range in brackets. F-values are from ANCOVA, controlling for age, CGG repeats, household income, and general health problems. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Estimates from the growth curve model predicting FXTAS symptoms over time.
| Fixed part | Estimate (s.e.) |
|---|---|
| Control variables | |
| Age (at Time 2) | 0.07 (0.04) |
| CGG repeats | 0.02 (0.02) |
| Household income | −0.14 (0.05)** |
| General health problems | 0.15 (0.07)* |
| Main effects | |
| College degree attainment (= 1) | −1.76 (0.66)** |
| Time (in years from Time 2) | −0.24 (0.17) |
| Time-squared | 0.069 (0.027)* |
| Cross-level interactions | |
| Time x College degree | 0.30 (0.19) |
| Time-squared x College degree | −0.061 (0.030)* |
| Constant | 3.35 (0.61)*** |
| Random part | |
| Var (Time) | 0.000 (0.000) |
| Var (Time squared) | 0.002 (0.002) |
| Var (intercept) | 4.66 (1.28) |
| Log likelihood | −786.68 |
Note. Regression coefficients are presented with robust standard errors in parentheses. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Fig. 1Adjusted means of FXTAS-type symptoms by college degree attainment over time. The model adjusts for age, CGG repeats, household income, and general health problems.
Fig. 2Individual trajectories of FXTAS-type symptoms by college degree attainment.
Correlations among study variables.
| Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) having a college degree | 1.000 | |||||||||
| (2) Maternal age | 0.055 | 1.000 | ||||||||
| (3) CGG repeats | 0.042 | −0.234* | 1.000 | |||||||
| (4) Household income | 0.166 | 0.095 | 0.028 | 1.000 | ||||||
| (5) General health problems | −0.178 | 0.104 | 0.017 | 0.005 | 1.000 | |||||
| (6) Depressive symptoms | −0.403*** | −0.172 | −0.026 | −0.411*** | 0.166 | 1.000 | ||||
| (7) Anxiety | −0.280** | −0.146 | −0.035 | −0.308** | 0.195 | 0.809*** | 1.000 | |||
| (8) Number of drinks a week | 0.080 | −0.067 | −0.009 | 0.024 | −0.113 | −0.097 | −0.078 | 1.000 | ||
| (9) Years of smoking | −0.165 | 0.057 | 0.030 | −0.122 | 0.217* | 0.156 | 0.199 | −0.043 | 1.000 | |
| (10) FXTAS-type symptoms | −0.391*** | 0.106 | 0.001 | −0.290** | 0.434*** | 0.400*** | 0.466*** | 0.084 | 0.184 | 1.000 |
Note. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Fig. 3Direct and indirect effects of college degree attainment on FXTAS-type symptoms. Models adjust for age, household income, CGG repeats, and general health problems. Panel (A): Mediation through depressive symptoms. Panel (B): Mediation through anxiety.
Notes. For each path, regression coefficients are presented with robust standard errors in parentheses. For the indirect effects, the coefficients are presented with bias-corrected bootstrap 95% confidence intervals based on 2000 bootstrap samples in brackets. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.