| Literature DB >> 36235459 |
Ling Lei1,2, Dan Wu3, Chao Cui1, Xiang Gao1,4, Yanjie Yao1, Jian Dong1,4, Liangsheng Xu5, Mingming Yang1,4.
Abstract
Flag leaf senescence is an important determinant of wheat yield, as leaf senescence occurs in a coordinated manner during grain filling. However, the biological process of early senescence of flag leaves post-anthesis is not clear. In this study, early senescence in wheat was investigated using a high-throughput RNA sequencing technique. A total of 4887 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified, and any showing drastic expression changes were then linked to particular biological processes. A hierarchical cluster analysis implied potential relationships between NAC genes and post-anthesis senescence in the flag leaf. In addition, a large set of genes associated with the synthesis; transport; and signaling of multiple phytohormones (JA, ABA, IAA, ET, SA, BR, and CTK) were expressed differentially, and many DEGs related to ABA and IAA were identified. Our results provide insight into the molecular processes taking place during the early senescence of flag leaves, which may provide useful information in improving wheat yield in the future.Entities:
Keywords: early senescence; flag leaf; post-anthesis; transcriptome; wheat
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235459 PMCID: PMC9572001 DOI: 10.3390/plants11192593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Summary of transcriptome sequencing data.
| Sample Name | 0DAA | 15DAA | 25DAA | 30DAA |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw reads | 66,015,110 | 64,686,904 | 65,524,154 | 73,133,852 |
| Clean reads | 64,279,134 | 62,887,574 | 63,658,066 | 71,300,896 |
| Q30 (%) | 92.23 | 92.15 | 92.2 | 92.44 |
| Total mapped | 47,615,252 (74.08%) | 46,028,993 (73.19%) | 46,574,821 (73.16%) | 49,556,485 (69.50%) |
| Uniquely mapped | 42,096,708 (65.49%) | 40,727,648 (64.76%) | 41,740,379 (65.57%) | 44,467,404 (62.37%) |
| Exon mapped (%) | 90.1 | 89.9 | 89.7 | 88.8 |
Figure 1Enrichment analysis of GO terms in three sequential periods. (A) 0–15 DAA. (B) 15–25 DAA. (C) 25–30 DAA. “*”: Significantly enriched GO terms, p < 0.05.
Figure 2Classification of DEGs based on their expression dynamics. Only 12 groups (A–L) with enriched KEGG pathways are shown. “f” refers to the flat expression; “d” and “u” represent significant down- and up-regulation, respectively. The number in parentheses is the percentage of DEGs in each class. (A–I) three letters, for example, “ddd” indicate down-regulation at 0–15 DAA, 15–25 DAA and 25–30 DAA. (J) “df” indicates DEGs with downregulation expressions at 0–25 DAA and flat expressions at 25–30 DAA. (K,L) “fu” and “fd” indicate DEGs with flat expressions at 0–15 DAA and differential expressions at 15–30 DAA. The median (horizontal lines), 25th and 75th percentiles (boxes), and expression ranges (whiskers) are shown for each group.
Figure 3Expression trends of differentially expressed transporter genes. (A–D) Amino acid transporter genes. (E–G) Carbohydrate transporter genes. (H) Aquaporin transporter genes. (I) Cu transporter genes. (J) Mg transporter genes. (K–N) K transporter genes. (O–S) Fe and Zn transporter genes.
Figure 4Cluster analysis of differentially expressed transcription factor genes. (A–N) The expression pattern of transcription factors of different families in the 0–15 DAA, 15–25 DAA, and 25–30 DAA period. Different colorful lines show the overall trend of genes expression in three periods. TF families are noted in the cluster where most of their members belong. The figure in parentheses indicates the gene number in the group.
Figure 5Cluster analysis of phytohormone-related DEGs. (A) ABA. (B) IAA. (C) BR. (D) CTK. (E) ET. (F) JA. (G) SA. “●”: Phytohormone receptor, “▲”: Positive regulator, “◆”: Negative regulator, “■”: Influx transporter, “★”: Efflux transporter, and “▼”: Synthesis gene.