Intensification of Polyphenols Extraction from Eryngium creticum Leaves Using Ired-Irrad® and Evaluation of Antibiofilm and Antibacterial Activities.

(1) Background: Eryngium creticum is a plant medicinally valued, and used in pharmacopeia to treat various diseases. No previous studies have been reported on E. creticum leaf extracts using an IR-assisted technique; thus, this study aimed to intensify polyphenol extraction using Ired-Irrad®, comparing it to the conventional water bath (WB) method. (2)
Methods: Optimization of polyphenol extraction from E. creticum leaves was conducted using Response Surface Methodology. Ired-Irrad® was used and compared to the WB method. The biological activities (antiradical, antioxidant, antibacterial, and antibiofilm) of both extracts were assessed. UHPLC analysis was performed to analyze the phytochemical profile of both extracts. (3)
Results: Under optimal conditions, IR improved the polyphenol extraction yield by 1.7 times, while lowering ethanol consumption by 1.5 times. Regarding the antibacterial activity, both WB and IR E. creticum leaf extracts exhibited the highest antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis. The maximum biofilm prevention capacity was also noticed against S. epidermidis. UHPLC-MS analysis quantified two major phenolic compounds in both extracts: rutin and sinapic acid. (4) Conclusions: Ired-Irrad® technology proved to be an effective technique in intensifying polyphenol recovery, while preserving their quantity and quality.

1. Introduction

Eryngium creticum, a perennial plant belonging to the Apiaceae family, is found in East Mediterranean countries such as Lebanon, Palestine, Jordan, and Syria where it is consumed in salads. This plant, known as Kors-Anneh, is valued medicinally and used in pharmacopeia for the treatment of many diseases such as liver diseases, anemia, and infertility [1]. The infusion of roots and seeds of this plant is also recommended to treat kidney stones, skin infections, and tumors. E. creticum is considered an alternative to an antidote since it may be beneficial in the treatment of snakebites and scorpion stings [2]. Previous studies carried out on biological activities of E. creticum have confirmed its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties. Other studies reported the presence of terpenoids, saponins, flavonoids, coumarin, polyacetylenes, steroids, and essential oils in the Eryngium genus [3,4,5]. Nevertheless, most species of Eryngium have not yet been explored for their chemical composition.

Phenolic compounds, the largest group of plant secondary metabolites, are abundant in fruits, vegetables, and herbal teas, and have been exhaustively investigated due to their beneficial effects on human health and their use as food additives [6]. Therefore, different techniques were developed aiming to extract polyphenols from plant materials. Although the conventional water bath method (WB) presents many disadvantages such as the high consumption of energy and of organic solvents, it is still widely used due to its simplicity [7]. Ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), pressurized liquid extraction (PAE), supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), pulsed-electric field extraction (PEF), high-voltage electrical discharges (HVED), and other extraction methods are known as being non-conventional. These novel techniques offer several advantages such as shorter extraction times, reduced organic solvent consumption, and higher extraction yields [8,9].

Ired-Irrad (IR) is a patented extraction technique [10] that uses the infrared energy released from a ceramic emitter to heat the solvent–matrix mixture [11]. This treatment has been proven to improve the extraction yield of phenolic compounds [12] from different plant materials such as pomegranate peels [13], orange peels [14], and olive leaves [11] compared to conventional extraction methods. Regarding the quality of these IR extracts, they exhibited a higher antiradical activity, which could be related to the reduced extraction time applied on one hand, and to the mode of action (heat transfer) of infrared irradiations on the other hand.

To our knowledge, no previous studies have been reported on polyphenol extraction from E. creticum leaves using an IR-assisted technique. Hence, the aim of this study was to enhance polyphenol extraction from E. creticum leaves using Ired-Irrad, to identify and quantify the phenolic compounds, and to evaluate the antioxidant, antibacterial, and antibiofilm capacities of the leaf extracts.

2. Results

2.1. Selection of Particle Size and Solid to Liquid Ratio

The determination of particle size was based on preliminary experiments. The reduction in particle size from a whole leaf to 2–4.75 mm increased significantly (p < 0.05) the polyphenols content of the extract from 15 to 25 mg Gallic Acid Equivalents/g DM (mg GAE/g DM). Therefore, a particle size of 2–4.75 mm was selected for the following experiments.

Different solid-to-liquid ratios were studied: 1/20, 1/30, 1/40, 1/50, and 1/60. Decreasing the solid to liquid ratio from 1/20 to 1/50 g/mL increased the phenolic yield from 30 to 74 mg GAE/g DM. The same Total Phenolic Content (TPC) was observed for higher solid to liquid ratios. Therefore, 1/50 g/mL was adopted for the subsequent experiments.

2.2. Influence of Time, Temperature, and Ethanol Percentage on TPC Yield, and DPPH Inhibition Percentage

Optimization of polyphenols extraction was performed by the response surface methodology to select the optimal conditions for the highest extraction yield and antiradical activity for both WB and IR extraction techniques. A model was designed by setting the solid to liquid ratio to 1/50 (g/mL) and the particle size to 2–4.75 mm, varying time, temperature, and solvent mixture. TPC values (mg GAE/g DM) and DPPH inhibition percentages for WB and IR extracts are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Central composite arrangement for independent variables and their responses for TPC (mg GAE/g DM) and DPPH inhibition percentage.

Run	Variable			Responses
	Time (min)	Temperature (°C)	Ethanol Percentage (%)	IR		WB
				TPC(mg GAE/g DM)	DPPH Inhibition Percentage	TPC(mg GAE/g DM)	DPPH Inhibition Percentage
1	70	35	30	23.39	45.15	17.46	25.45
2	170	35	30	26.08	53.10	19.42	38.93
3	70	75	30	44.59	81.80	35.56	7.42
4	170	75	30	47.73	77.71	40.87	28.65
5	70	35	70	18.13	33.53	12.55	61.53
6	170	35	70	23.04	44.70	17.99	41.21
7	70	75	70	45.23	65.50	35.02	56.51
8	170	75	70	47.14	55.04	43.14	56.96
9	36	55	50	30.69	41.41	20.19	11.98
10	204	55	50	44.93	55.29	38.29	53.05
11	120	21	50	26.28	34.95	15.68	16.21
12	120	88	50	73.53	83.20	57.20	23.17
13	120	55	16	35.41	50.33	28.36	14.52
14	120	55	83	37.41	52.26	25.76	70.43
15	120	55	50	39.42	80.81	36.42	66.71
16	120	55	50	39.17	80.84	35.97	69.63
17	120	55	50	40.93	80.46	35.51	67.09
18	120	55	50	40.58	80.36	36.40	67.81
19	120	55	50	39.42	80.94	34.68	68.15
20	120	55	50	40.48	79.19	35.27	68.72
21	120	55	50	40.82	78.42	34.23	69.63
22	120	55	50	40.73	79.71	34.68	67.33

The impact of the three studied parameters on the TPC and DPPH assay in dried E. creticum leaf extract was analyzed based on the Pareto chart (Figure 1 and Figure 2a,b) and estimated response surface Mesh (Figure 1 and Figure 2c,d) for both IR and WB extracts, respectively. Figure 1 and Figure 2a,b, show the Pareto Chart for the parameter’s extraction time, temperature, and ethanol percentage, including the estimated response surface. It was noticed that the temperature exhibited a significant positive linear effect on the polyphenol extraction yield from E. creticum leaves for both WB and IR extraction techniques, and a significant negative quadratic effect only in the case of WB for the DPPH inhibition percentage. In addition, extraction time had a positive linear effect on TPC for both WB and IR extraction techniques. On the other hand, the ethanol percentage revealed a negative quadratic effect on TPC and DPPH for both IR and WB extraction techniques.

Figure 1

Standardized Pareto Chart for TPC (a) and DPPH (b) inhibition percentage for IR extraction, and estimated response surface Mesh for TPC (c) and DPPH (d) inhibition percentage. (+) indicates positive effect, (−) indicates negative effect.

Figure 2

Standardized Pareto Chart for TPC (a) and DPPH (b) inhibition percentage for WB extraction, and estimated response surface Mesh for TPC (c) and DPPH (d) inhibition percentage. (+) indicates positive effect, (−) indicates negative effect.

Response values were given by statistical analysis to fit the second-degree regression model equation of the form shown in Table 2. The maximum TPC yield was obtained with an ethanol percentage of 50% and 75% for IR and WB, respectively.

Table 2

Second-order regression equations for IR and WB extraction.

Extraction Technique	Equations
IR	TPC = − 10.21 + 0.29 t + 0.0015 T + 0.52 E − 0.0009 t2 − 0.0003 t T + 0.0001 t E + 0.005 T2 + 0.003 T E − 0.007 E2DPPH = − 159.174 + 1.25 t + 3.19 T + 2.41 E − 0.004 t2 − 0.004 t T − 0.0004 t E − 0.015 T2 − 0.0056 T E − 0.02 E2
WB	TPC = − 26.83 + 0.26 t + 0.42 T + 0.62 E − 0.00111123 t2 + 0.0007 t T + 0.0008 t E − 0.0006 T2 + 0.002 T E − 0.009 E2DPPH = − 184.92 + 1.27 t + 3.06 T + 2.65 E− 0.004 t2 + 0.0035 t T− 0.007 t E − 0.03 T2 + 0.012 T E − 0.017 E2

2.3. Optimization of Extraction

Optimal extraction conditions were selected based on TPC and DPPH inhibition percentage of the obtained extracts. The IR technique was found to improve the extraction yield of polyphenols, by 1.7 times, compared to the conventional method (water bath extraction) from E. creticum leaves by increasing the TPC value from 45.5 mg GAE/g DM for WB extraction to 76 mg GAE/g DM for IR extraction (Table 3).

Table 3

Optimum extraction conditions for WB and IR techniques.

Parameters	Optimum Conditions
	WB		IR
	TPC	DPPH	TPC	DPPH
Time (min)	167	116	130	113
Temperature (°C)	89	58	88	79
Ethanol (%)	75	74	55	42
TPC optimal value (mg GAE/g DM)	56.6		77
DPPH optimal value (%)		76		88.8
R-squared	97.3	92.65	92.4	94.17
Parameters	Multiple Optimization
	WB		IR
Time (min)	162		109
Temperature (°C)	91		89
Ethanol (%)	75		50
TPC value predicted (mg GAE/g DM)	45.5		76
TPC value observed (mg GAE/g DM)	44.60 ± 1.6		75.83 ± 1.3
DPPH inhibition percentage predicted (%)	66.2		83.7
DPPH inhibition percentage observed (%)	63.10 ± 1.3		82.80 ± 0.5

In order to maximize both the polyphenol quantity and their biological activity simultaneously, a multiple response optimization was applied in Figure 3, and the best experimental conditions were determined. Table 3 shows the optimal conditions for the recovery of TPC from both WB (167 min, 89 °C, 75% ethanol) and IR (130 min, 88 °C, 55% ethanol), as well as those for the obtainment of the highest antiradical activity. The model had a satisfactory level of adequacy with high R2, indicating a reasonable agreement of the corresponding model with the experimental results (Table 3).

Figure 3

Contours plots generated from multiple response analysis for TPC and DPPH for Eryngium creticum IR (A) and WB (B) extracts. The star represents the multiple optimum conditions.

Finally, the extraction using both methods was conducted under the predicted optimal conditions in order to verify the predictive capacity of the model. TPC and DPPH (Table 3) were tested and predicted values were confirmed by the experimental ones.

2.4. Identification of Polyphenols by UHPLC Analysis of the Optimal Conditions for IR and WB Extracts

The UHPLC analyses of both optimized E. creticum leaf extracts (IR and WB) were performed in order to assess the effect of the extraction technique on the phytochemical profile, and to correlate these results with the TPC values. The results showed that rutin and sinapic acid were the phenolic compounds detected in both extracts, with rutin being the most abundant identified compound. According to the results in Table 4, optimum conditions led to the highest values of rutin: 9.8 μg/mL and 6.4 μg/mL, for the IR and WB extracts, respectively. The IR extract had a threefold higher concentration of sinapic acid, compared to WB.

Table 4

Phenolic compounds concentrations (μg/mL) in IR and WB Eryngium creticum leaf extracts.

Extraction Method	Concentration (μg/mL)
	Rutin	Sinapic Acid
IR	9.8	4
WB	6.4	1.3

2.5. Antioxidant Activities of IR and WB Extracts Obtained under the Optimal Extraction Conditions

FRAP, ABTS, and CUPRAC assays were used to assess the antioxidant capacities of the optimized E. creticum leaf IR and WB extracts (Figure 4). The IR extract gave the highest antioxidant activity of 2424 ± 16.4 µM Iron II, 621.52 ± 2.13 mM AA, and 18.7 ± 0.81 mM TE compared to WB extracts of 1355 ± 16.4 µM Iron II, 303.76 ± 2.15 mM AA, and 12.0 ± 0.07 mM TE for FRAP, ABTS, and CUPRAC, respectively.

Figure 4

Antiradical and antioxidant capacities of Eryngium creticum leaf extracts were assessed by FRAP (a), ABTS (b), and CUPRAC (c). Letters a and b on the bars indicate significant statistical difference.

2.6. Antibacterial Activities of the Optimal Conditions for IR and WB Extracts

E. creticum leaf extracts showed an antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative tested bacterial strains. MIC and MBC values are summarized in Table 5.

Table 5

MIC and MBC values of Eryngium creticum leaf extracts against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus aureus.

Plant extract	MIC (mg/mL)				MBC (mg/mL)
	E. coli	P. aeruginosa	S. epidermidis	S. aureus	E. coli	P. aeruginosa	S. epidermidis	S. aureus
IR	75	100	75	100	100	>100	100	>100
WB	100	100	50	100	100	100	75	100

(>) indicates that a higher concentration of extract might be needed to achieve the antibacterial effect.

E. creticum leaf extracts exhibited the highest antibacterial activity against the S. epidermidis strain with an MIC value of 50 mg/mL and 75 mg/mL for WB and IR extracts, respectively. Moreover, an MBC value of 75 mg/mL and 100 mg/mL for WB and IR extracts was shown, respectively. Nonetheless, the IR extract showed the highest antibacterial activity against E. coli (Gram-negative) with an MIC of 75 mg/mL, lower than the WB extract with an MIC value of 100 mg/mL. Furthermore, both E. creticum leaf extracts exhibited the same antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa and S. aureus with an MIC value of 100 mg/mL.

2.7. Antibiofilm Prevention Activity of IR and WB Extracts Obtained at Optimal Extraction Condition

Figure 5 shows the antibiofilm preventing the activity of E. creticum leaf extracts on S. epidermidis and E. coli bacterial strains using two extraction techniques (IR and WB), by representing the optical density of crystal violet (O.D 570 nm) as a function of different extract concentrations (mg/mL).

Figure 5

Preventing antibiofilm activity of different concentrations of Eryngium creticum leaf extracts on Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli strains. Red continuous line corresponds to OD 0.9, red dashed line corresponds to OD 0.2. Different letters (a, b, c, d, e, and f) on the bars indicate significant statistical difference (p < 0.05).

To our knowledge, no studies have been reported about the antibiofilm prevention activity of E. creticum extracts. Results demonstrated that both extracts of E. creticum exhibited an antibiofilm activity against S. epidermidis (Gram-positive) and E. coli (Gram-negative) tested strains, with a strong antibiofilm activity against S. epidermidis.

The maximal biofilm prevention capacity against S. epidermidis was 96% and 82% for E. creticum for the WB and IR extracts, respectively, at a concentration of 100 mg/mL. Moreover, the WB extract exhibited a higher antibiofilm activity against S. epidermidis with a prevention capacity of 96% compared to the capacity of 42% against E. coli. However, the IR extract showed a higher antibiofilm activity against S. epidermidis with a prevention capacity of 82% compared to the capacity against E. coli of 49%.

3. Discussion

The reduction in particle size from a whole leaf to 2–4.75 mm increased the polyphenols content by 1.7 times in the extract. Particle size reduction is known to increase the extraction yield of phenolic compounds, since the augmentation of the contact surface enhances the accessible area for mass transfer between plant and solvent [13]. Concerning the determination of the solid-to-liquid ratio, the phenolic yield is increased while decreasing the solid-to-liquid ratio from 1/20 to 1/50 g/mL, and remained constant at a higher solid-to-liquid ratio than 1/50. Increasing the volume leads to higher diffusivity of target molecules into the extracting solvent [15]. For that reason, this solid-to-liquid ratio was adopted for the subsequent experiments.

After selecting the most suitable particle size (2–4.75 mm) and solid-to-liquid ratio (1/50 g/mL), the optimization process of polyphenols recovery was performed by the response surface methodology. It is noticeable that temperature and time had positive linear effects on TPC for both WB and IR since their increase led to the maximum TPC yield. Many studies have confirmed that increasing the temperature improves the extraction yield by improving the mass transfer through the enhancement of both solubility of solute and diffusion coefficients [15,16,17]. On the other hand, high temperatures are likely to break the cell walls releasing polyphenols. However, the negative quadratic effect of time on TPC is explained by the fact that with high extraction temperatures coupled with long periods of time, some phenolic compounds may be lost or degraded [8].

Temperature and time also had negative quadratic effects on the antiradical activity of both IR and WB extracts. In spite of the positive linear effect of higher extraction temperature on TPC yield, the heating process negatively affects the quality of the phenolic compounds subjecting them to degradation and/or oxidation [17,18,19].

The ethanol percentage had negative linear and quadratic effects on TPC yield and DPPH for IR. The increase in ethanol percentage affected negatively the IR efficiency, which is probably related to the high diversity of phenolic compounds, and their different solubility in water or ethanol [13,14]. This might be also due to the adequation between the absorption characteristics of water molecules with the used IR wavelengths. This observation suggests that the majority of the phenolic compounds were extracted using an intermediate solvent polarity varying between that of pure water and pure ethanol. Treatment by infrared irradiations showed a great impact on the improvement in TPC yield. The IR technique induced higher cellular and structural modifications leading to higher polyphenols release that may be due to the molecular rocking and twisting caused by the infrared irradiations [20]. The basic features of infrared radiation are the high capacity of heat transfer, and heat penetration directly into the product [21].

For WB extraction, despite the non-significant linear negative effect of ethanol percentage on TPC, there was a significant negative quadratic effect on TPC yield. Previous studies have proven the influence of an ethanol–water mixture on the phenolic compounds’ extraction compared to water [22,23].

The maximum TPC yield was obtained with an ethanol percentage of 50% and 75% for IR and WB, respectively (Table 2; Figure 3), which explains that the emitted IR wavelength is related to the solvent polarity [21]. Moreover, the reduction in organic solvent usage with IR limits environmental pollution, which is considered one of the most important concerns of green extraction.

Phenolic compounds were identified and quantified in both E. creticum leaf extracts by UHPLC analysis. The diversity and selectivity of extracted compounds could be related to the molecule’s structure as well as the extraction conditions of each method [24].

Many studies have reported on the presence of different phenolic compounds in Eryngium extracts [25,26,27,28]. Our results are in agreement with the literature, which reported that among the phenolic compounds, rutin and sinapic acid were determined in E. planum, E. campestre, and E. maritimum extracts [25,26]. Likewise, previous studies confirmed that rutin is the major phenolic compound with a concentration of 290.5 μg/mL in E. planum [25] compared to 9.8 μg/mL and 6.4 μg/mL for E. creticum IR and WB extracts, respectively.

The phenolic compounds exhibited a wide range of biological activities including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial, antiviral, and therapeutic, leading to pharmaceutical, cosmetic, and food industry applications [29]. Furthermore, the usage of these bioactive molecules in various industrial or pharmaceutical applications in food supplements is very important. Therefore, the presence of these valuable phenolic compounds in Eryngium extracts might be responsible for many health benefits, and could explain the biological activity of Eryngium leaf extracts. In the literature, rutin is reported as an antimicrobial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer agent, as well as a potent antioxidant compound [30]. Moreover, sinapic acid is a phytochemical found in various plants recognized for their antibacterial and antioxidant capacities [31,32]. Several studies conducted on various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains indicated the significant antibacterial potential of sinapic acid [32].

Concerning the antiradical and antioxidant capacities, E. creticum leaf IR extract gave the highest activity compared to the WB extract. Therefore, IR treatment proved to intensify TPC extraction yield from E. creticum leaves while preserving the antioxidant-antiradical capacities. A previous study has reported the antioxidant capacity of ethanolic E. creticum extract obtained by maceration for 48 h, with a 15% inhibition of DPPH [33]. This inhibition percentage is lower than the 63% and 83% obtained for the WB and IR E. creticum leaf extracts in this study, respectively.

Our results showed that E. creticum leaf WB extract exhibited the highest antibacterial activity against S. epidermidis with an MIC value of 50 mg/mL; while E. creticum leaf IR extract showed the highest antibacterial activity against E. coli with an MIC value of 75 mg/mL; this may be explained by the selectivity of the extraction method on the extracted bioactive compounds. A previous study has reported the antibacterial activity of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of E. creticum leaves, extracted by maceration for 8 h at 37 °C, against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, with an MIC of 354 mg/mL and 294 mg/mL for aqueous and ethanolic extracts, respectively, against S. aureus; however, E. coli was highly resistant and not inhibited even at highest tested concentration [34]. This demonstrates the efficiency of the IR technique by lowering the minimal inhibition concentration to 100 mg/mL against the S. aureus strain. Meot-Duros et al. have reported on the antibacterial activity of E. maritimum leaf extract against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and other bacterial strains, with the highest sensitivity being of P. aeruginosa [35].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

Eryngium creticum was collected from the South Lebanon region at about 400 m of altitude. It was identified by referring to the well-known guide of Lebanon’s flora [36]. Before the extraction process, the plant’s materials were cleaned and dried in an airflow oven (UFE 700, Memmert GmbH, Schwabach, Germany) at 35 °C for 48 h. Dried leaves were ground using a grinder with a blade (IKA knife mill M20) and sieved to a particle size of 2–4.75 mm, and stored in the dark at room temperature for further use.

4.2. Chemicals, Media, and Bacterial Strains

Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, sodium carbonate, gallic acid (3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoic acid), DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-picrylhydrazyl), Trolox (6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid), as well as all HPLC standards and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany).

Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB), Luria-Bertani broth (LB), Brain Heart Agar (BHA), and Mueller–Hinton Broth (MHB) were purchased from HIMEDIA (Mumbai, India). All media were prepared in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.

Two Gram-positive strains and two Gram-negative strains (Table 6) were used to determine the antibacterial activity of E. creticum extracts. All strains were stored at −80 °C in glycerol before use.

Table 6

Bacterial strains used in this study.

	Bacterial Strains	Reference
Gram-positive	Staphylococcus aureus	ATCC 49619
	Staphylococcus epidermidis RP62A	ATCC 35984
Gram-negative	Escherichia coli	ATCC 35218
	Pseudomonas aeruginosa	ATCC 27853

4.3. Dry Matter Content

Dry matter (DM) content of E. creticum was determined by drying the leaves in a ventilated oven at 105 °C for 24 h, and the DM content was calculated and expressed in percent (% w/w). The DM is 88 ± 0.006% w/w.

4.4. Extraction Procedures

A preliminary study was conducted using different particle sizes (whole leaf, 6.5–4.75 mm, 2–4.75 mm) and different solid-to-liquid ratios (1/20 to 1/60 g/mL). After defining the particle size and the solid-to-liquid ratio, the optimization of the extraction process was performed using RSM. Two grams of dried E. creticum leaves were added to 100 mL of solvent (solid to liquid ratio of 1/50) with various percentages of ethanol–water mixture v/v (from 16% to 84%). The extracts were filtered, and the filtrates were condensed by evaporation using a rotary evaporator (Heidolph, Germany). Subsequently, the filtrates were frozen at −80 °C prior to lyophilization (Freezer dryer, Alpha 1-4 LD plus, Germany).

4.4.1. Water Bath Extraction (WB)

The Water Bath extraction (WB) was carried out using a water bath (Clifton, UK) as illustrated in Figure 6a. Dried E. creticum leaves (size of 2–4.75 mm) were placed in an Erlenmeyer with the solvent mixture at the appropriate temperature for a given extent of time with stirring.

Figure 6

Experimental setup of water bath (a) and Infrared (b) equipment.

4.4.2. Infrared-Assisted Extraction (IR)

The IR extraction was conducted using the apparatus illustrated in Figure 6b. The extraction prototype is based on a ceramic infrared emitter (Rotfil, Pianezza, Italy) for the heating process, linked to a proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control for temperature adjustment. Dried E. creticum leaves (size of 2–4.75 mm) were placed in a round bottom flask with the solvent mixture, connected to a condenser, at the appropriate temperature for a given time. The round bottom flask was maintained at a 1 cm distance from the IR emitter.

4.5. Experimental Design

The quality and quantity of the phenolic compounds are affected by several parameters. The optimization of the extraction process was performed using RSM, taking into consideration “t” as the extraction time, “T” as the extraction temperature, and “E” as the solvent mixture, to evaluate the effect of each parameter and the interaction between parameters. A rotatable central composite design (23 + star), with 22 runs including 8 repetitions at the central points, was established to assess the main effect of these 3 factors on TPC and DPPH inhibition percentage as response parameters. The extraction time varied between 70 and 170 min, the temperature varied between 35 and 75 °C, and the ethanol percentage varied between 30% and 70% v/v. The used higher and lower bonds were considered as −1 and +1 levels, respectively. The same design was used both for WB and IR extraction techniques.

Considering three parameters and one response, experimental data were fitted to obtain a second-degree regression equation of the form:Y = α where “Y” is the predicted response parameter; α0 is the mean value of responses at the central point of the experiment; α1, α2, and α3 are the linear coefficients; α4, α5, and α6 are the quadratic coefficients; α7, α8, and α9 are the interaction coefficients. Experimental design and statistical analysis of the results were performed using STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVII-X64.

4.6. Determination of TPC

The TPC was determined according to the Folin–Ciocalteu method previously described by Slinkard and Singleton [37]. A volume of 200 μL of the E. creticum extract was mixed with 1000 μL of Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (diluted 1/10 v/v) and 800 μL of Na2CO3 7.5% (w/v). The blend was incubated for 10 min at 60 °C and 10 min at 4 °C. The absorbance was measured at 750 nm using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (GENESYS 10 UV, Thermo Electron Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA). Gallic acid was used as standard for the calibration curve determination. The TPC was expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry matter (mg GAE/g DM).

4.7. Ultra–High–Performance Liquid Chromatography (UHPLC)

Phenolic compounds in the E. creticum extracts were separated using a Thermo Vanquish UHPLC system (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a pump, degasser, autosampler, and a photodiode array detector (PDA). Samples (5 μL) were injected onto an Acquity BEH C18 column (150 × 2.1 mm, particle size 1.7 μm) (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The flow rate used was 0.350 mL/min at a column temperature of 25 °C. The eluents used were formic acid (0.1% v/v) in water (A) and acetonitrile (B). The following gradient was used: 0–2 min at 4% B (isocratic), 2–30 min from 4 to 60% B (linear gradient), 30–30.1 min 60 to 100% B (linear gradient), 30.1–35 min at 100% B (isocratic), 35–35.1 min from 100 to 4% B (linear gradient), and 35.1–40 min at 4% B (isocratic). The PDA detector was set to record wavelengths between 200 and 680 nm. Identification of the compounds was performed by comparison of retention time and spectra with representative standards. Quantification of phenolic compounds was achieved by construction of calibration curves of rutin, caffeic acid, sinapic acid, vanillic acid, ferulic acid, and coumaric acid.

4.8. Antiradical Activity

Antiradical activity was measured by the capacity of the phenolic compounds in the samples to reduce the free radical, DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-picrylhydrazyl) [38]. Briefly, 1.45 mL of DPPH (0.06 mM) radical was added to 50 μL of E. creticum extracts or Trolox (as positive control). The absorbance at 515 nm was measured after 30 min of incubation in the dark at room temperature using pure methanol as a blank. The inhibition percentage of the DPPH free radical is calculated as follows:

Antiradical activity was expressed as μg of Trolox equivalent per milliliter (μg TE/mL).

4.9. Antioxidant Activity

4.9.1. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay (FRAP)

This assay was completed using the FRAP antioxidant capacity kit (Bioquochem, Asturias, Spain), which measures the antioxidant activity of compounds that are able to reduce the ferric complex at an acidic pH, in the presence of a suitable antioxidant solution. Briefly, 10 μL of the extracts, or standard, was added to 220 μL of ready-to-use FRAP working solution. The absorbance was measured using a plate reader at 593 nm after 4 min mixing under continuous stirring. The antioxidant activity was expressed as μM of Iron (II) equivalent (Iron (II) μM).

4.9.2. 2,2′-Azinobis (3-Ethylbenzothiazoline-6-Sulphonic Acid) Radical Scavenging Assay (ABTS)

The ABTS assay was conducted using the ABTS Assay Kit (Bioquochem, Asturias, Spain). An amount of 200 μL of previously prepared ABTS solution was mixed with 5 μL of the diluted extracts or standard (ascorbic acid). The absorbance was monitored spectrophotometrically using a plate reader at 734 nm after 5 min under continuous stirring. The ABTS scavenging capacity was expressed in mM of ascorbic acid equivalent (AA mM).

4.9.3. Cupric Ion Reducing Antioxidant Capacity Assay (CUPRAC)

CUPRAC assay kit (Bioquochem, Asturias, Spain) was also applied to measure the antioxidant activity of the extract. CUPRAC enables measurements of the total antioxidant capacity by the oxidation of the copper (II)-neocuproine (2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline). An amount of 40 μL of the diluted extracts, or standard (Trolox), was added to 200 μL of previously prepared working solution. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 min, and then the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a plate reader. Results were expressed as mM Trolox Equivalent (TE mM).

4.10. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimal Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) Assays

MICs and MBCs were determined using the microdilution method as recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) adopted in our RLM [39,40]. A total of 100 µL of each extract was used to perform serial twofold dilutions in MHB using a 96-well cell culture plate. Then, a diluted bacterial suspension (volume of 5 μL) was added to each well to give a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/mL (according to CLSI recommendation). Wells without any plant extract but with bacterial inoculum were used as a positive control and those without bacterial inoculum as negative control. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The MIC of each extract was determined by observing the lowest concentration of extract where no visible growth was observed compared to the negative and positive controls. Afterward, the contents of all wells with no visible growth were plated on BHA in order to determine the MBC, which is the lowest concentration of each extract killing all the bacterial population by >99.9% (<5 CFU/plate).

4.11. Biofilm Prevention Assay

A 96-well polystyrene tissue culture-treated microtiter plate was used to assess the biofilm prevention activity of E. creticum extracts. A total of 100 µL of TSB medium supplemented with 0.25% (w/v) glucose and 100 µL of extracts were added to the first well of microplates and serial twofold dilution was performed. A diluted bacterial suspension (5 µL) was added as inoculum to each well to give a final concentration of 5 × 105 CFU/mL. Wells without any plant extract were used as a positive control for biofilm formation and wells without bacterial inoculum were used as a negative control. The microplate was incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Hereafter, the well content was removed, and the biofilm formed in the wells was fixed by heating for 1 h at 80 °C. Then, 100 µL of crystal violet (0.1%) was added to each well for staining and subsequently washed after 5 min. Finally, 100 µL of distilled water was added and the optical density (OD) was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Tristar2 S LB 942, Berthold, Germany) [41,42]. Minimal biofilm prevention concentration (MBPC) was defined as being the lowest concentration exhibiting the highest significant biofilm formation prevention.

4.12. Statistical Analysis

All experiments and measurements were performed in triplicate (n = 3) and the results were expressed as mean value ± standard deviation. The data between the control and experimental groups were analyzed by p values; p-values < 0.05 were considered significant with a more than 95% confidence rate. Results were analyzed by variance analyses (ANOVA) and the statistical analyses were carried out using STATGRAPHICS® Centurion XVII-X64 software for extraction optimization process and GraphPad Prism® Software (Version 6.05; GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) for prevention of antibiofilm activity.

5. Conclusions

This study demonstrated the efficiency of infrared irradiations in intensifying the extraction of phenolic compounds from dried E. creticum leaves. Compared to water bath extraction, IR-assisted extraction improved the polyphenols recovery by 1.7 times, while shortening the extraction time and decreasing ethanol consumption by 1.5 times. This improvement was also confirmed by UHPLC results, in which the same phenolic compounds in the WB extract were detected at higher concentrations after IR extraction. Both extracts of E. creticum leaves exhibited a strong antibiofilm activity against S. epidermidis. Ired-Irrad is a new extraction technique that can enhance polyphenol extraction with less extraction time and solvent consumption, while preserving their quality as compared to those obtained by a conventional technique.

6. Patent

Rajha, H.N.; Debs, E.; Maroun, R.G.; Louka, N. Système d’extraction, de séparation ou de prétraitement assisté par rayonnement infrarouge. Adéquation entre les caractéristiques du rayonnement et celles de la matière traitée. Lebanese Patent 2017/11-11296L, granted on 29 November 2017.