| Literature DB >> 36235206 |
Shahid Jamil1, Ghulam Dastagir1, Ahmed Ibrahim Foudah2, Mohammed Hamed Alqarni2, Hasan Soliman Yusufoglu3, Huda Mohammed Alkreathy4, Ömer Ertürk5, Muhammad Abdur Rehman Shah6, Rahmat Ali Khan6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to the high expense, less effectiveness and more side effects of available synthetic medicine, the researchers and communities are focusing on phyto-based natural bioactive compounds, which are considered safer for the treatment of syndromes and chronic diseases. AIM: The current project was aimed to determine the phytochemicals constituents available in the aerial parts of methanol extract of Carduus edelbergii via GC-MS, fabrication of AuNPs mediated with the mentioned extract; characterization and evaluation of antimicrobial, antioxidant and antidiabetic potency of the synthesized AuNPs.Entities:
Keywords: Carduus edelbergii; antidiabetic; antimicrobial; antioxidant; gold nanoparticles; in vitro; in vivo
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235206 PMCID: PMC9572856 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196669
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1(a) Chemical constituents are found in the methanol extract of Carduus edelbergii, (b) total-ion chromatogram (TIC) calculated from GC-MS analysis of methanol extract of Carduus edelbergii.
Figure 2Chemical structure of chemical constituents showing higher concentration.
Chemical constituents found in the methanol extract of Carduus edelbergii.
| Sr. No. | Name of Constituents | R. Time | Area | Concentration % | Kovait Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | 3,5-Dihydroxy-6-methyl-2,3-dihudro-4H-pyran-4-on | 6.958 | 435,318 | 1.55 | 997 |
| 2. | Octanoic Acid | 7.425 | 87,890 | 0.31 | 1012 |
| 3. | Octanoic Acid, ethyl ester | 9.087 | 295,840 | 1.05 | 1060 |
| 4. | Hydroxymethylfurfurale | 8.757 | 431,553 | 1.54 | 1051 |
| 5. | 2-Decenal (E)- | 10.107 | 651 | 0.00 | 1085 |
| 6. | Decanoic acid, ethyl ester | 12.914 | 483,607 | 1.72 | 1157 |
| 7. | Tridecane | 13.046 | 94,238 | 0.34 | 1160 |
| 8. | Hexadecanoic acid, ethyl ester | 17.663 | 1,134,708 | 0.40 | 1260 |
| 9. | 4-((1E)-3-Hydroxy-1-propenyl)-2-methoxyphenol | 20.828 | 137,401 | 0.49 | 1328 |
| 10. | Tetradecanoic acid | 21.316 | 136,039 | 0.48 | 1339 |
| 11. | Spiro[bicycle [3.3.0]octan-6one-3-cyclopropane] | 21.720 | 125,990 | 0.45 | 1348 |
| 12. | 9-Hexadecenoic acid, 1,4-methyl ester, (Z)- | 24.331 | 117,568 | 0.42 | 1404 |
| 13. | Pentadecanoic acid, 1,4-methyl-, methyl ester | 24.758 | 2,729,595 | 9.71 | 1414 |
| 14. | n-Hexadecanoic acid | 25.552 | 4,235,069 | 15.07 | 1433 |
| 15. | 13-Docosenoic acid, methyl ester, (Z)- | 27.237 | 10,724,346 | 38.16 | 1472 |
| 16. | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester, (E, E)- | 27.986 | 963,815 | 3.43 | 1488 |
| 17. | 9-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester, (E)- | 28.125 | 4,422,512 | 15.72 | 1491 |
| 18. | 11-Octadecenoic acid, methyl ester | 28.20.8 | 360,740 | 1.28 | 1493 |
| 19. | Oleic Acid | 28.913 | 2,208,215 | 7.86 | 1509 |
Figure 3UV-Vis-Spectrophotometric Analysis of the Carduus edelbergii mediated AuNPs.
Figure 4X-ray Diffractogram of the Carduus edelbergii mediated AuNPs.
Figure 5(a) FTIR of the Carduus edelbergii methanol extract, (b) FTIR of the Carduus edelbergii fabricated AuNPs.
Figure 6SEM analysis of the Carduus edelbergii mediated AuNPs.
Figure 7EDX elemental analyses of AuNPs.
Elemental composition of various elements in AuNPs sample.
| Element | Weight% | Atomic% |
|---|---|---|
| C K | 15.66 | 62.26 |
| N K | 2.07 | 7.04 |
| O K | 3.92 | 11.69 |
| Au M | 78.36 | 19.00 |
| Total | 100.00 |
Figure 8DPPH free radical scavenging effectiveness of extract and its fabricated AuNPs.
Figure 9ABTS free radical scavenging capability of extract and its fabricated AuNPs.
Antibacterial zone of inhibition (mm) of extract and its mediated AuNPs.
| Bacterial Species | Amoxicillin | AuNPs | Extract |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 15.4 ± 0.2 | 12.3 ± 0.3 | 9.1 ± 0.7 |
|
| 16.2 ± 0.5 | 9.3 ± 0.4 | 8.4 ± 0.5 |
|
| 14.1 ± 0.7 | 12.5 ± 0.6 | 8.5 ± 0.2 |
|
| 15.3 ± 0.4 | 11.2 ± 0.6 | 8.7 ± 0.3 |
|
| 15.2 ± 0.3 | 10.7 ± 0.6 | 9.9 ± 0.5 |
Antifungal potential (zone of inhibition: mm) of extract and its mediated AuNPs.
| Bacterial Species | Terbinafine | AuNPs | Extract |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 98.1 ± 1.9 | 92.4 ± 4.3 | 58.3 ± 2.7 |
|
| 97.5 ± 2.5 | 70.8 ± 5.5 | 62.28 ± 2.7 |
Minimum inhibitory concentration (µg/mL) of extract and its mediated AuNPs.
| Bacterial Species | Amoxicillin | AuNPs | Extract |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 20.27 | 25.13 | 49.31 |
|
| 14.80 | 17.43 | 35.24 |
|
| 1.35 | 2.50 | 11.25 |
|
| 2.60 | 3.75 | 12.50 |
|
| 3.87 | 4.73 | 13.75 |
Minimum inhibitory concentration of extract and its mediated AuNPs.
| Bacterial Species | Terbinafine | AuNPs | Plant Extract |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 6.31 | 9.75 | 13.50 |
|
| 3.23 | 5.74 | 10.75 |
Percent antidiabetic potency of extract, glibenclamide and AuNPs.
| S. No | Extract | Glibenclamide | AuNPs |
|---|---|---|---|
| 250 | 50.4 ± 2.6 | 55.3 ± 4.2 | 50.2 ± 4.5 |
| 500 | 52.2 ± 4.2 | 58.5 ± 3.8 | 55.4 ± 2.7 |
| 750 | 57.7 ± 3.5 | 62.2 ± 4.3 | 59.3 ± 3.8 |
| 1000 | 60.8 ± 3.8 | 65.1 ± 3.2 | 63.7 ± 5.1 |
Consequences on body weight of diabetic rats of a methanol extract and AuNPs.
| Groups | Body Weight (g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Day | 7th Day | 14th Day | 21st Day | |
| Normal | 260.6 ± 5.71 | 262.1 ± 5.11 | 265.3 ± 4.21 | 267.1 ± 4.78 |
| Diabetic control | 265.0 ± 5.31 | 256.3 ± 5.21 | 246.0 ± 3.31 | 234.0 ± 3.56 |
| Glibenclamide (10 mg/Kg BW) | 264.5 ± 6.71 | 258.3 ± 5.32 | 259.2 ± 5.12 * | 262.5 ± 4.70 * |
| Extract (150 mg/Kg BW) | 263.3 ± 3.13 | 254.3 ± 3.22 | 255.2 ± 3.20 | 257.4 ± 6.05 |
| Extract (300 mg/Kg BW) | 268.5 ± 6.67 | 259.3 ± 7.04 | 262.0 ± 7.06 * | 266.3 ± 6.54 * |
| AuNPs (5 mg/Kg BW) | 260.1 ± 8.23 | 260.5 ± 6.89 | 261.1 ± 8.12 * | 262.3 ± 8.20 * |
| AuNPs (10 mg/Kg BW) | 275.5 ± 3.65 | 273.0 ± 3.68 * | 276.7 ± 3.85 ** | 278.1 ± 4.22 ** |
The data (n = 5) are articulated as Mean ± SD, a significance is indicated at p < 0.05 (Dunnett’s-test); Comparison of the normal group was made with untreated diabetic group, and in turn, its relationship was established with groups treated with extract, AuNPs and standard. The level of significance is shown as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Effect of methanol extract and AuNPs on blood glucose.
| Groups | Blood Glucose Level (mg/dL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Day | 7th Day | 14th Day | 21st Day | |
| Normal | 99.6 ± 3.50 | 100.4 ± 2.88 | 101.8 ± 3.27 | 102.8 ± 2.86 |
| Diabetic control | 272.8 ± 2.58 | 280.4 ± 2.30 | 290.2 ± 1.92 | 305.8 ± 3.03 |
| Glibenclamide (10 mg/Kg BW) | 272.8 ± 9.78 | 254.4 ± 9.07 * | 224.2 ± 7.15 ** | 145.6 ± 3.20 ** |
| Extract (150 mg/Kg BW) | 290.6 ± 9.50 | 265.2 ± 7.69 | 182.4 ± 8.17 * | 157.2 ± 3.11 * |
| Extract (300 mg/Kg BW) | 286.0 ± 9.84 | 237.2 ± 8.07 ** | 177.4 ± 2.88 * | 127.8 ± 8.19 ** |
| AuNPs (5 mg/Kg BW) | 282.4 ± 6.76 | 232.4 ± 7.02 ** | 164.6 ± 6.80 ** | 111.2 ± 6.72 *** |
| AuNPs (10 mg/Kg BW) | 283.6 ± 8.20 | 229.6 ± 7.26 ** | 157.6 ± 5.50 ** | 102.0 ± 1.58 *** |
The data (n = 5) are articulated as Mean ± SD, a significance is indicated at p < 0.05 (Dunnett’s-test); Comparison of the normal group was made with untreated diabetic group, and in turn, its relationship was established with groups treated with extract, AuNPs and standard. The level of significance is shown as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Effect of methanol extract and AuNPs on rat’s liver function.
| Groups | ALT (µmol/L) | AST (µmol/L) | Total Bilirubin (µmol/L) | ALP (µmol/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 140 ± 2.3 | 60 ± 2.23 | 1.04 ± 0.23 | 212 ± 3.68 |
| Diabetic control | 231 ± 2.9 | 102 ± 3.89 | 1.95 ± 0.34 | 411 ± 4.20 |
| Glibenclamide (10 mg/Kg BW) | 153 ± 3.6 ** | 91.3 ± 3.14 | 1.37 ± 0.05 | 293 ± 4.71 * |
| Extract (150 mg/Kg BW) | 152 ± 2.8 ** | 84.7 ± 3.92 * | 1.39 ± 0.10 | 299 ± 4.20 * |
| Extract (300 mg/Kg BW) | 144 ± 5.1 *** | 78.7 ± 5.35 ** | 1.28 ± 0.15 * | 214 ± 6.50 *** |
| AuNPs (5 mg/Kg BW) | 148 ± 8.1 *** | 81.5 ± 3.96 * | 1.32 ± 0.19 | 232 ± 5.13 ** |
| AuNPs (10 mg/Kg BW) | 141 ± 5.1 *** | 71.6 ± 3.06 ** | 1.05 ± 0.11 ** | 209 ± 5.18 *** |
The data (n = 5) are articulated as Mean ± SD, a significance is indicated at p < 0.05 (Dunnett’s-test); Comparison of the normal group was made with untreated diabetic group, and in turn, its relationship was established with groups treated with extract, AuNPs and standard. The level of significance is shown as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Effect of methanol extract and AuNPs on HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and serum VLDL cholesterol.
| Groups | TG (mg/dL) | Cholesterol (mg/dL) | LDL (mg/dL) | VLDL (mg/dL) | HDL (mg/dL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | 97 ± 1.5 | 89 ± 1.6 | 28 ± 2.3 | 20 ± 0.39 | 46 ± 5.3 |
| Diabetic control | 172 ± 1.3 | 94 ± 9.9 | 46 ± 2.1 | 33 ± 1.9 | 25 ± 1.4 |
| Glibenclamide (10 mg/Kg BW) | 137 ± 4.3 * | 92 ± 3.1 * | 33 ± 3.1 ** | 24 ± 0.6 * | 35 ± 2.3 * |
| Extract (150 mg/Kg BW) | 142 ± 4.5 * | 93 ± 3.79 * | 35 ± 4.1 * | 25 ± 0.3 | 35 ± 3.9 * |
| Extract (300 mg/Kg BW) | 121 ± 1.4 * | 91 ± 5.1 ** | 32 ± 3.9 ** | 23 ± 0.32 * | 42 ± 4.1 ** |
| AuNPs (5 mg/Kg BW) | 127 ± 4.17 * | 92 ± 4.2 * | 33 ± 3.2 ** | 24 ± 0.25 * | 41 ± 4.5 ** |
| AuNPs (10 mg/Kg BW) | 99 ± 3.69 ** | 90 ± 3.1 ** | 29 ± 4.1 ** | 20. ± 0.83 ** | 45 ± 2.3 *** |
The data (n = 5) are articulated as Mean ± SD, a significance is indicated at p < 0.05 (Dunnett’s-test); Comparison of the normal group was made with untreated diabetic group, and in turn, its relationship was established with groups treated with extract, AuNPs and standard. The level of significance is shown as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.
Effect of a methanol extract and AuNPs on creatinine and urea in rat’s serum.
| Groups | Creatinine (mg/dL) | Urea (mg/dL) |
|---|---|---|
| Normal | 0.66 ± 0.07 | 37.5 ± 1.40 |
| Diabetic control | 1.69 ± 0.27 | 52.0 ± 3.810 |
| Glibenclamide (10 mg/Kg BW) | 1.06 ± 0.27 * | 41.3 ± 2.30 * |
| Extract (150 mg/Kg BW) | 0.92 ± 0.72 * | 43.8 ± 0.13 * |
| Extract (300 mg/Kg BW) | 0.78 ± 0.04 ** | 39.4 ± 2.70 ** |
| AuNPs (5 mg/Kg BW) | 0.79 ± 0.20 ** | 38.8 ± 2.70 ** |
| AuNPs (10 mg/Kg BW) | 0.72 ± 0.10 *** | 37.2 ± 3.06 ** |
The data (n = 5) are articulated as Mean ± SD, a significance is indicated at p < 0.05 (Dunnett’s-test); Comparison of the normal group was made with untreated diabetic group, and in turn, its relationship was established with groups treated extract, AuNPs and standard. The level of significance is shown as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001.