| Literature DB >> 36235140 |
Fan Shi1, Yijing Ai1, Baoli Wang1,2, Yucen Yao1,3, Zejun Zhang1,4, Juan Zhou1, Xianghui Wang1, Wei Sun1.
Abstract
To build a portable and sensitive method for monitoring the concentration of the flavonoid rutin, a new electrochemical sensing procedure was established. By using nitrogen-doped carbonized polymer dots (N-CPDs) anchoring few-layer black phosphorene (N-CPDs@FLBP) 0D-2D heterostructure and gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as the modifiers, a carbon ionic liquid electrode and a screen-printed electrode (SPE) were used as the substrate electrodes to construct a conventional electrochemical sensor and a portable wireless intelligent electrochemical sensor, respectively. The electrochemical behavior of rutin on the fabricated electrochemical sensors was explored in detail, with the analytical performances investigated. Due to the electroactive groups of rutin, and the specific π-π stacking and cation-π interaction between the nanocomposite with rutin, the electrochemical responses of rutin were greatly enhanced on the AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP-modified electrodes. Under the optimal conditions, ultra-sensitive detection of rutin could be realized on AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP/SPE with the detection range of 1.0 nmol L-1 to 220.0 μmol L-1 and the detection limit of 0.33 nmol L-1 (S/N = 3). Finally, two kinds of sensors were applied to test the real samples with satisfactory results.Entities:
Keywords: electrochemistry; functionalized black phosphorene nanocomposite; portable wireless intelligent electrochemical sensor; rutin; screen-printed electrode
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235140 PMCID: PMC9571638 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Diagram of electrochemical reaction mechanism of rutin on AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP/CILE (SPE) interface, and the performance comparisons of the conventional CILE-based sensor and portable wireless intelligent SPE-based sensor. (NF: nafion ethanol solution).
Figure 2(a) Electrochemical behavior of 20.0 μmol L−1 rutin with different modified electrodes (scan rate: 0.1 V s−1); (b) the effects of different pH (1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0) on oxidation peak potentials and oxidation peak currents for rutin on NF/AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP/CILE in 0.1 mol L−1 PBS; (c) CV curves of 20.0 μmol L−1 rutin on NF/AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP/CILE at different scan rates (0.03, 0.05, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 V s−1); DPV curves of rutin with NF/AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP/CILE in 0.1 mol L−1 PBS containing rutin concentrations from (d) 0.01 μmol L−1 to 10.0 μmol L−1 and (e) 10.0 μmol L−1 to 180.0 μmol L−1; (f) the linear relationship between Ipa and concentration of rutin (inset: The linear relationship from 0.01 μmol L−1 to 10.0 μmol L−1).
Figure 3(a) The selectivity of NF/AuNPs/FLBP@pN-CPNDs/CILE to rutin over other analytes. The radar chart shows the RE of interferents on 20.0 μmol L−1 rutin determination; (b) oxidation peak currents of NF/AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP/CILE for rutin (20.0 μmol L−1) after storage in a 4 °C refrigerator for 6 weeks. (Notes: RHA, rhamnose; MAN, mannose; Glu, glucose; Gly, glycine; CA, citric acid; AA, ascorbic acid; UA, uric acid; ALA, alanine; DA, dopamine; BPA, bisphenol; QR, quercetin; CT, catechol; RS, resorcinol).
Figure 4(a) Optical photograph of bending the modified SPE into 120°; DPV curves of rutin at NF/AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP/SPE in 0.1 mol L−1 PBS containing rutin concentrations from (b) 1.0 nmol L−1 to 10.0 μmol L−1 and (c) 10.0 μmol L−1 to 240.0 μmol L−1; (d) the linear relationship between Ipa and concentration of rutin (inset: The linear relationship from 1.0 nmol L−1 to 10.0 μmol L−1).
Comparisons of the analytical performance of rutin detection with different modified electrodes.
| Electrodes | Methods | Electrolytes | Detection Ranges (μmol L−1) | LOD | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-MBT/PGE | CV | BR (pH 4.5) | 0.039–1.10, | 9.60 | [ |
| VMSF/ErGO/ITO | DPV | PBS (pH 3.0) | 0.30–2.00, | 2.30 | [ |
| CTAC-Gr-PdNPs/GCE | SWV | PBS (pH 2.0) | 0.02–1.00 | 5.00 | [ |
| AuNCs/CILE | DPV | PBS (pH 2.0) | 0.004–700.00 | 1.33 | [ |
| DNA-CPIE | DPV | BR (pH 3.0) | 0.008–10.00 | 1.30 | [ |
| PtNPs/RGO/GCE | DPV | PBS (pH 6.0) | 0.057–102.59 | 20.00 | [ |
| BP-PEDOT: PSS/GCE | DPV | PBS (pH 6.5) | 0.02–15.00, | 7.00 | [ |
| GNR/Gr electrode | DPV | PBS (pH 7.0) | 0.032–1.00 | 7.86 | [ |
| NF/AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP/CILE | DPV | PBS (pH 3.0) | 0.01–10.00, | 3.00 | This work |
| NF/AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP/SPE | DPV | PBS (pH 3.0) | 0.001–10.00, | 0.33 | This work |
Notes: MBT, 2-mercaptobenzothiazole; PGE, pencil graphite electrode; BR, Britton–Robinson; VMSF, vertically ordered silica mesoporous films; ErGO, electrochemically reduced graphene oxide; ITO, indium tin oxide; CTAC, cetyltrimethylammonium chloride; Gr, graphite; GCE, glassy carbon electrode; SWV, square wave voltammetry; AuNCs, gold nanocages; CPIE, carbon paste ionic liquids electrode; RGO, reduced graphene oxide; PEDOT: PSS, poly (3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly(styrenesulfonate); GNR, graphene nanoribbon; CV, cyclic voltammograms; DPV, differential pulse voltammetry; PBS, phosphate buffer solution; LOD, limit of detection.
Determinations of rutin in real samples using NF/AuNPs/N-CPDs@FLBP/CILE (SPE).
| Samples | Added | NF/AuNPs/ | NF/AuNPs/ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Found | Recovery | RSD | Found | Recovery | RSD | ||
| Rutin pharmaceutical tablet | - | 32.70 | - | 1.98 | 32.72 | - | 1.30 |
| 10.0 | 42.51 | 98.10 | 2.05 | 42.98 | 102.80 | 1.12 | |
| 20.0 | 52.56 | 99.35 | 1.96 | 53.10 | 102.00 | 1.58 | |
| 30.0 | 63.20 | 101.67 | 1.65 | 62.85 | 100.50 | 1.60 | |
| FSI | - | 8.62 | - | 2.02 | 8.79 | - | 1.94 |
| 10.0 | 18.89 | 102.70 | 3.13 | 19.21 | 105.90 | 2.80 | |
| 20.0 | 28.23 | 95.48 | 2.07 | 28.72 | 100.50 | 2.05 | |
| 30.0 | 38.81 | 100.63 | 1.85 | 38.45 | 98.87 | 1.99 | |
Notes: FSI, flos sophorae immaturus; RSD, relative standard deviations.