| Literature DB >> 36235106 |
Jing Lu1,2, Yu Zhao1,2, Rong Hu1,2, Yu Cheng1,2, Junhuan Qin2, Jie Yang1,2, Yaowei Fang1,2, Mingsheng Lyu1,2, Shujun Wang1,2.
Abstract
Bacillus velezensis is a type of microorganism that is beneficial to humans and animals. In this work, a protease-producing B. velezensis strain Z-1 was screened from sludge in the sea area near Qingdao (deposit number CGMCC No. 25059). The response surface methodology was used to analyze protease production, and the optimal temperature was 37.09 °C and pH 7.73 with the addition of 0.42% NaCl, resulting in maximum protease production of 17.64 U/mL. The optimum reaction temperature and pH of the protease of strain Z-1 were 60 °C and 9.0, respectively. The protease had good temperature and pH stability, and good stability in solvents such as methanol, ethanol and Tween 80. Ammonium, NH4+,and Mn2+ significantly promoted enzyme activity, while Zn2+ significantly inhibited the enzyme activity. The protease produced by strain Z-1 was used for the enzymolysis of mussel meat. The mussel hydrolysate exhibited good antioxidant function, with a DPPH free radical removal rate of 75.3%, a hydroxyl free radical removal rate of 75.9%, and a superoxide anion removal rate of 84.4%. This study provides a reference for the application of B. velez protease and the diverse processing applications of mussel meat.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus velezensis; antioxidation; enzymatic hydrolysis; mussel; protease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36235106 PMCID: PMC9572009 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196570
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Colony morphology of strain Z-1 (a); Gram stain diagram of strain Z-1 (b).
Physiological and biochemical characteristics of strain Z-1.
| Project | Result | Project | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gram stain | + | Urea | + |
| 7% NaCl salt tolerance | + | Glucose | + |
| PH 5.7 growth | + | Sucrose | + |
| V-P | + | Maltose | − |
| Gelatin liquefaction | + | Cellobiose | − |
| Amylase hydrolysis | + | Lactose | − |
| Nitrate reduction | + | Gum sugar | + |
| H2S gas production | − | Xylose | + |
| Methyl red | − | Aescin | + |
| Propionate | − | Salicin | − |
| Mannitol | + | Ornithine decarboxylase | − |
| Sorbitol | + | Lysine decarboxylase | − |
Note: “+” indicates positive; “−” is negative.
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree of strain Z-1 constructed based on 16S rRNA.
Figure 3(a) Protease production curve by fermentation of strain Z-1; (b)Effect of temperature on enzyme production by fermentation of strain; (c) Effect of pH on enzyme production by fermentation of strain; (d) Effect of NaCl addition on enzyme production by fermentation of strain.
Figure 4(a,b) Effects of fermentation pH and NaCl addition on protease activity; (c,d) Effects of fermentation pH and temperature on protease activity; (e,f) Effects of fermentation NaCl addition and temperature on protease activity.
Figure 5(a) Effect of temperature on enzyme activity; (b) Effect of pH on enzyme activity; (c) Effect of temperature on the stability of enzyme activity; (d) Effect of pH on the stability of enzyme activity.
Effect of metal ions on protease activity.
| Metal Ion | Relative Enzyme Activity (%) (5 mM) | Relative Enzyme Activity (%) (25 mM) |
|---|---|---|
| Blank | 100 ± 0.43 | 100 ± 0.64 |
| Ca2+ | 102.44 ± 1.62 | 91.43 ± 2.72 |
| K+ | 82.58 ± 1.32 | 93.30 ± 3.20 |
| Na+ | 56.73 ± 2.63 | 99.39 ± 0.68 |
| Zn2+ | 51.83 ± 1.02 | 5.94 ± 0.84 |
| Mg2+ | 72.10 ± 0.26 | 106.45 ± 1.61 |
| Ni2+ | 71.67 ± 2.89 | 43.63 ± 2.63 |
| Ba2+ | 65.93 ± 2.36 | 104.47 ± 0.57 |
| Sr2+ | 74.22 ± 1.28 | 98.70 ± 2.40 |
| NH4+ | 71.88 ± 1.60 | 135.91 ± 1.39 |
| Li+ | 69.86 ± 0.57 | 103.73 ± 2.38 |
| Mn2+ | 89.12 ± 0.80 | 147.18 ± 0.93 |
Effects of several chemical reagents on protease activity.
| Reagent Type | Reagent Name | Final Concentration | Relative Enzyme Activity(%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Ultrapure water | - | 100 ± 0.68 |
| Reductant | Glutathione | 10 mM | 91.32 ± 1.58 |
| β-Mercaptoethanol | 10 mM | 89.41 ± 1.22 | |
| Cysteine | 10 mM | 98.63 ± 2.12 | |
| Denaturant | SDS | 0.10% | 71.00 ± 0.48 |
| Urea | 4 M | 78.32 ± 1.65 | |
| Protease Inhibitor | EDTA | 5 mM | 79.27 ± 2.56 |
| PMSF | 5 mM | 52.75 ± 0.78 | |
| Surfactant | TritonX-100 | 0.10% | 77.83 ± 1.50 |
| Tween80 | 0.10% | 119.89 ± 2.61 | |
| Organic solvent | Methyl alcohol | 10% | 113.24 ± 1.55 |
| Ethyl acetate | 10% | 45.43 ± 1.48 | |
| Dimethyl sulfoxide | 10% | 111.58 ± 2.87 | |
| Ethanol | 10% | 104.31 ± 0.45 | |
| Ethanol | 20% | 29.90 ± 1.23 | |
| Ethanol | 30% | 21.33 ± 0.84 |
Figure 6(a) Effect of enzymolysis time on free amino acid nitrogen; (b)Effect of enzymolysis time on DPPH scavenging activity.
Figure 7(a) Scavenging activity of Y1 DPPH radical of enzymolysis product; (b) Scavenging activity of Y1 hydroxyl radical of enzymolysis product; (c) Superoxide anion radical scavenging activity of enzymolysis product; (d) Determination of the reducing force of enzymolysis product Y1.