| Literature DB >> 36234983 |
Alla Mirgorodskaya1, Rushana Kushnazarova1, Rais Pavlov1, Farida Valeeva1, Oksana Lenina1, Kseniya Bushmeleva1, Dmitry Kuryashov2, Alexandra Vyshtakalyuk1, Gulnara Gaynanova1, Konstantin Petrov1, Lucia Zakharova1.
Abstract
Abietic acid, a naturally occurring fir resin compound, that exhibits anti-inflammatory and wound-healing properties, was formulated into biocompatible emulgels based on stable microemulsions with the addition of a carbamate-containing surfactant and Carbopol® 940 gel. Various microemulsion and emulgel formulations were tested for antioxidant and wound-healing properties. The chemiluminescence method has shown that all compositions containing abietic acid have a high antioxidant activity. Using Strat-M® skin-modelling membrane, it was found out that emulgels significantly prolong the release of abietic acid. On Wistar rats, it was shown that microemulsions and emulgels containing 0.5% wt. of abietic acid promote the rapid healing of an incised wound and twofold tissue reinforcement compared to the untreated group, as documented by tensiometric wound suture-rupture assay. The high healing-efficiency is associated with a combination of antibacterial activity of the formulation components and the anti-inflammatory action of abietic acid.Entities:
Keywords: abietic acid; antioxidant activity; drug delivery systems; emulgel; gelating polymer; microemulsion; surfactant; wound healing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234983 PMCID: PMC9572722 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27196447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Scheme 1Structural formulas of compounds in study.
Composition and designations of the formed microemulsions and emulgels.
| System | Concentration, % wt. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oleic Acid | Tween 80 | CB-16(Bu) | PBS | Ethanol | Abietic Acid | Carbopol® 940 | |
| ME 1 | 15.7 | 19.7 | - | 37.4 | 27.2 | - | - |
| ME 2 | 15.6 | 19.6 | - | 37.2 | 27.1 | 0.5 | - |
| ME 3 | 15.7 | 16.7 | 3.0 | 37.4 | 27.2 | - | - |
| ME 4 | 15.6 | 16.6 | 3.0 | 37.2 | 27.1 | 0.5 | - |
| ME 5 | 15.5 | 16.5 | 3.0 | 37.0 | 27.0 | 1.0 | - |
| EG 1 | 7.8 | 9.8 | - | 68.4 | 13.5 | - | 0.5 |
| EG 2 | 7.7 | 9.7 | - | 68.2 | 13.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| EG 3 | 7.8 | 8.3 | 1.5 | 68.4 | 13.5 | - | 0.5 |
| EG 4 | 7.7 | 8.2 | 1.5 | 68.2 | 13.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Stability of the microemulsions over time: the size and degree of polydispersity (PdI) of particles (25 °C).
| Microemulsion | First Day | A Month Later | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diameter, nm | PdI | Diameter, nm | PdI | |
| ME 1 | 122 ± 6 | 0.127 ± 0.017 | 110 ± 5 | 0.145 ± 0.018 |
| ME 2 | 118 ± 5 | 0.179 ± 0.021 | 115 ± 5 | 0.188 ± 0.019 |
| ME 3 | 60 ± 3 | 0.285 ± 0.031 | 70 ± 3 | 0.265 ± 0.033 |
| ME 4 | 62 ± 3 | 0.276 ± 0.028 | 72 ± 4 | 0.282 ± 0.030 |
Figure 1Frequency dependence of the storage (G′) and loss (G″) moduli (a); the loss tangent for ME 4 and EG 4 (b).
Figure 2Release of free abietic acid and abietic acid formulated in microemulsions and emulgels. The drug concentration in samples is 0.5% wt., PBS:ethanol (1:1) medium, 34 °C.
Curve fitting results (Figure 2) for the different release models.
| Formulation | Zero Order | First Order | Korsmeyer–Peppas | Higuchi | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Free abietic acid | 0.7969 | 7.41 ± 0.46 | 0.9323 | 0.10 ± 0.005 | 0.9912 | 15.0 ± 0.62 | 0.60 ± 0.02 | 0.9742 | 17.5 ± 0.39 |
| ME 2 | 0.9984 | 0.62 ± 0.005 | 0.9962 | 0.0065 ± 9.3·10−5 | 0.9988 | 0.61 ± 0.02 | 1.03 ± 0.01 | 0.7621 | 2.12 ± 0.24 |
| ME 4 | 0.9983 | 0.55 ± 0.005 | 0.990 | 0.0058 ± 4.0·10−5 | 0.9989 | 0.57 ± 0.02 | 0.97 ± 0.01 | 0.7912 | 1.91 ± 0.19 |
| EG 2 | 0.9986 | 0.48 ± 0.004 | 0.9994 | 0.0050 ± 2.7·10−5 | 0.9999 | 0.53 ± 0.001 | 0.97 ± 0.001 | 0.7829 | 1.70 ± 0.18 |
| EG 4 | 0.9976 | 0.45 ± 0.005 | 0.9979 | 0.0047 ± 5.0·10−5 | 0.9980 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 0.7792 | 1.61 ± 0.17 |
Figure 3Permeation of abietic acid from the microemulsions and emulgels through Strat-M® membranes over time, PBS:ethanol (1:1) medium, 34 °C.
Figure 4Apparent permeability constants of abietic acid loaded in microemulsions or emulgels.
Figure 5Graph of the change in the level of chemiluminescence in time with the addition of 5 µL (a) and 10 µL (b) of the tested microemulsions or emulgels in 1 mL of luminol solution.
Figure 6Tensile strength of healing wounds in control group and after treatment with different compositions, * p < 0.05 compared to control.