| Literature DB >> 36234260 |
Jeong-Hyun Ryu1, Jiyeon Roh2, Utkarsh Mangal1, Kwang-Mahn Kim3, Sung-Hwan Choi1, Jae-Sung Kwon3,4.
Abstract
Calcium silicate cement (CSC) is widely used as an endodontic material in clinical applications such as direct pulp capping, pulpotomy, or root canal. CSC has good biocompatibility, sealing properties, and the ability to enhance hard tissue regeneration. However, the disadvantage of CSC is the difficulty in handling when placing it into endodontic tissue due to the long setting time. Several attempts have been made to improve handling of CSC; however, these methods were limited by osteogenic properties. To overcome such a disadvantage, this study investigated the use of Pluronic F127 (F127) for the development easy-to-handle novel endodontic CSCs with osteogenic properties. In this case, different concentrations of F127 (5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40%) were implemented to generate CSC specimens H5, H10, H20, H30, and H40, respectively. Calcium ion was continuously released for 28 days. In addition, each group resulted in apatite formation for 28 days corresponding to calcium ion release. The concentration of F127 showed opposite relationships with water solubility and compressive strength. The H20 group showed a high level of osteogenic activity compared to other groups at 14 days. Mineralization of the H20 group was higher than that of the other groups. This study indicates that the novel F127-based hydrogel with CSC can potentially be used as endodontic filler.Entities:
Keywords: calcium silicate cement; endodontic filler; osteogenic property; pluronic F127 hydrogel
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234260 PMCID: PMC9570614 DOI: 10.3390/ma15196919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Calcium ion release of each experimental group in distilled water over 28 days. The calcium ions of the experimental group were proportionately released from days 7 to 28 in contrast to the MDW group.
Figure 2(A) Representative images of apatite formation in control and experimental groups after immersion in SBF for 28 days (scale bar = 1 μm). (B) X-ray diffractograms highlighting hydroxyapatite phase.
Figure 3The physical and mechanical properties of control and experimental groups: (A) water solubility; (B) compressive strength. The F127 concentration showed opposite relationships with water solubility and compressive strength. Different small case letters indicate statistically significant differences between the groups with analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc.
Figure 4Cell viability of control and experimental groups. The 100% concentration was cytotoxic in all cases, whereas the 50% concentration featured cell viability exceeding 80%. Different small case letters indicate statistically significant differences between the groups with analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc.
Figure 5Osteogenic properties of control and experimental groups. (A) ALP staining and activity, highlighting significant difference of H20 group (p < 0.05). (B) Mineralization, highlighting a higher but insignificant difference of H20 group. Different small case letters indicate statistically significant differences between the groups with analysis of variance and Tukey’s post-hoc. GM; growth medium, OM; osteogenic medium.