| Literature DB >> 36234002 |
Din Bandhu1, Faramarz Djavanroodi2,3, G Shaikshavali4, Jay J Vora5, Kumar Abhishek6, Ashish Thakur7, Soni Kumari8, Kuldeep K Saxena8, Mahmoud Ebrahimi9, Shokouh Attarilar9.
Abstract
Environmental and human-friendly welding is the need of the hour. In this context, this study explores the application of the regulated metal deposition (RMD) technique for ASTM A387-Gr.11-Cl.2 steel plates. To examine the effect of metal-cored filler wire (MCFW), MEGAFIL 237 M was employed during regulated metal deposition (RMD) welding of 6 mm thick ASTM A387-Gr.11-Cl.2 steel plates. The welding was carried out at an optimized current (A) of 100 A, voltage (V) of 13 V, and gas flow rate (GFR) of 21 L/min. Thereafter, the as-welded plates were examined for morphological changes using optical microscopy. Additionally, the micro-hardness of the as-welded plates was measured to make corroboration with the obtained surface morphologies. In addition to this, the as-welded plates were subjected to heat treatment followed by surface morphology and micro-hardness examination. A comparison was made between the as-welded and heat-treated plates for their obtained surface morphologies and microhardness values. During this, it was observed that the weld zone of as-welded plates has a dendritic surface morphology which is very common in fusion-based welding. Similarly, the weld zone of heat-treated plates has a finer and erratic arrangement of martensite. Moreover, the obtained surface morphologies in the weld zone of as-welded and heat-treated plates have been justified by their respective hardness values of 1588.6 HV and 227.3 HV.Entities:
Keywords: ASTM A387; RMD; filler wire; metal-cored; welding
Year: 2022 PMID: 36234002 PMCID: PMC9570648 DOI: 10.3390/ma15196661
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Deposition rates of filler wires: solid vs. flux-cored vs. metal cored [20].
Figure 2Fume generation: conventional filler wires vs. metal cored filler wires [20].
Figure 3Grooving, tacking, and welding of steel plates. (a) groove. (b) tack. (c) welded plates.
The chemical substance of MCFW and ASTM A378-Gr.11-Cl.2 steel.
| Cr | Mo | Mn | S | C | Si | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEGAFIL 237 M | 2.3% | 1.1% | 1.0% | 0.015% | 0.07% | 0.3% | 0.015% |
| ASTM A387-Gr.11-Cl.2 | 1.00–1.50% | 0.45–0.65% | 0.40–0.65% | 0.035% | 0.05–0.17% | 0.50–0.80% | 0.035% |
Particulars of experimental settings during welding.
| Elements | MCFW | MCFW Diameter | Shielding Gas | Welding Position and Progression |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Values | MEGAFIL 237 M | 1.2 mm | 90% Ar + 10% CO2 | 3G (Vertical) |
| Elements | GFR | Voltage | Current | Wire stick-out |
| Values | 21 L/min | 13 V | 100 A | 3–5 mm |
Figure 4Thermal cycle of the heat treatment.
Figure 5The direction and location of indentation for the micro-hardness assessment.
Figure 6The surface morphology of base metal.
Figure 7Surface morphology of the ASTM A387-Gr.11-Cl.2 weldments in various regions before heat treatment. (a) BM-HAZ interface. (b) HAZ-WZ interface. (c) WZ.
Figure 8Surface morphology of the ASTM A387-Gr.11-Cl.2 weldments in various regions after heat treatment. (a) BM. (b) HAZ. (c) WZ.
Figure 9Surface morphological changes post-heat treatment in (a) HAZ and (b) HAZ-WZ interface.
Figure 10Values of micro-hardness test.