| Literature DB >> 36233981 |
Alexander V Okotrub1,2, Dmitriy V Gorodetskiy2, Artem V Gusel'nikov2, Anastasiya M Kondranova2, Lyubov G Bulusheva1,2, Mariya Korabovska1, Raimonds Meija3, Donats Erts3.
Abstract
Arrays of aligned carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are anisotropic nanomaterials possessing a high length-to-diameter aspect ratio, channels passing through the array, and mechanical strength along with flexibility. The arrays are produced in one step using aerosol-assisted catalytic chemical vapor deposition (CCVD), where a mixture of carbon and metal sources is fed into the hot zone of the reactor. Metal nanoparticles catalyze the growth of CNTs and, during synthesis, are partially captured into the internal cavity of CNTs. In this work, we considered various stages of multi-walled CNT (MWCNT) growth on silicon substrates from a ferrocene-toluene mixture and estimated the amount of iron in the array. The study showed that although the mixture of precursors supplies evenly to the reactor, the iron content in the upper part of the array is lower and increases toward the substrate. The size of carbon-encapsulated iron-based nanoparticles is 20-30 nm, and, according to X-ray diffraction data, most of them are iron carbide Fe3C. The reasons for the gradient distribution of iron nanoparticles in MWCNT arrays were considered, and the possibilities of controlling their distribution were evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: EDX analysis; catalytic chemical vapor deposition; iron nanoparticles; vertically aligned carbon nanotube arrays
Year: 2022 PMID: 36233981 PMCID: PMC9570561 DOI: 10.3390/ma15196639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1Scheme of the CVD reactor (a). The numbers on the scheme indicate: 1—quartz tube reactor, 2—high-temperature tubular furnace, 3—quartz boat with silicon substrates, 4—injection device, 5—video registration system. Image of the edge of a quartz boat with a silicon substrate after 4 min (b) and 40 min (c) of CNT synthesis. The numbers indicate: 1—quartz boat; 2—silicon substrate edge. The growth rate of the CNT array (d).
Figure 2SEM images of side view (a) and top view (b) of CNT array. TEM images of CNTs taken with low magnification (c) and high magnification (d). Arrows in (c) show encapsulated iron nanoparticles.
Figure 3XRD patterns of MWCNT array on silicon substrate (1) and MWCNT sample detached from substrate (2) in comparison with reference patterns of iron carbide Fe3C and graphite. The patterns (1) and (2) are presented with zoom of 250 and 4, respectively.
Figure 4Raman spectrum (a), survey XPS spectrum (b), XPS C 1 s spectrum (c), and NEXAFS C K-edge spectrum (d) of MWCNT array.
Figure 5SEM images of catalytic layer and MWCNT array on silicon substrate obtained in the secondary electron registration mode at an accelerating voltage of 2 kV (a), in secondary (green color) and backscattering (red color) electron registration modes (b), and in secondary electron mode at 5 kV (c). Scheme of the initial growth stage of MWCNT array on silicon substrate (d). The numbers indicate: 1—MWCNT, 2—catalytic nanoparticle for tip growth; 3—catalytic nanoparticle for root growth; 4—silicon substrate.
Figure 6SEM image of MWCNTs obtained in secondary electron registration mode (a) and combined secondary electron/backscattering electron registration mode (b). SEM image of the array showing the areas of analysis and images of catalytic nanoparticles (red colored) (c). EDX-derived Fe/C ratio obtained using EDX analysis along the height of the MWCNT array (d).
Content (at.%) of main elements in various regions of the MWCNT array (Figure 6c) determined by EDX spectroscopy.
| Regions | Carbon | Silicon | Iron | Oxygen |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Top | 90 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Middle | 88 | 5 | 5 | 2 |
| Bottom | 82 | 10 | 6 | 2 |