| Literature DB >> 36233679 |
Yu-Wei Kuo1,2, En-Che Chang1, Chia-Yi Lee3,4,5, Shwu-Huey Lee1, I-Chia Liang1,6, Yi-Chun Chen1, Yu-Chih Hou1,7,8.
Abstract
We aimed to report the clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus (CMV) corneal endotheliitis and the results of long-term treatment with topical ganciclovir 2% with and without steroids. This retrospective, interventional study included 15 eyes of 13 patients diagnosed with CMV corneal endotheliitis by positive CMV DNA and treated with long-term topical ganciclovir 2% eye drops at a tertiary referral center and the median follow-up period was 17 months. Ocular manifestations included keratic precipitates (KPs) (100%), elevated IOP (93.3%), iritis (60%), corneal edema (60%), and moth-eaten iris atrophy (60%). After long-term treatment, corneal edema, iritis, and KPs significantly decreased (effect size: 72%, 76% and 70%, respectively; p = 0.024, p = 0.006 and p < 0.001, respectively). Both the logMAR acuity and IOP significantly improved (median logMAR was 0.52 before treatment and 0.22 after treatment; median IOP was 42 mmHg before treatment and 12 mmHg after treatment; p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). The ECD was maintained (effect size: 80%), and the percentage of hexagonal cell ratio of endothelial cells significantly improved after treatment (effect size: 82%; p = 0.035). Fewer anti-glaucoma medications were used in the non-steroid group (effect size: 79%; p = 0.034). Long-term maintenance treatment with topical ganciclovir 2% monotherapy not only provides effective therapy and reduces recurrence, but also decreases the high IOP related to the combination of steroids used.Entities:
Keywords: corneal endotheliitis; corticosteroid; cytomegalovirus; ganciclovir
Year: 2022 PMID: 36233679 PMCID: PMC9572523 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195811
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1Clinical manifestations of cytomegalovirus corneal endotheliitis by slit-lamp biomicroscopy. (A) Typical coin-shaped keratic precipitates (KPs) (white arrows) in the central cornea of case 1. (B) Some mutton-fat KPs (white arrows) in case 7. (C) Pigmented KPs (white arrows) in the peripheral cornea of case 10. (D) Moth-eaten iris atrophy (white arrows) in case 3.
The Ophthalmic Parameters Before and After Treatment in Cytomegalovirus Corneal Endotheliitis.
| Parameter | Pre-Treatment ( | Post-Treatment ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IOP (mmHg, median (IQR)) | 42.00 (28.00–48.00) | 12.00 (10.00–16.00) | <0.001 * |
| BCVA (LogMAR, median (IQR)) | 0.52 (0.30–0.52) | 0.22 (0.00–0.52) | 0.001 * |
| Corneal edema grading | 0.024 * | ||
| 0 | 6 | 13 | |
| 1 | 8 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| KP | 15 | 6 | <0.001 * |
| Iritis | 0.006 * | ||
| ECD (mm2, median (IQR)) | 1976 (1647–2331) | 1900 (1600–2500) | 0.302 |
| CV (%, median (IQR)) | 49 (42–54) | 45 (41–67) | 0.712 |
| HEX (%, median (IQR)) | 33 (27–49) | 38 (34–50) | 0.035 * |
| CCT (mm, median (IQR)) | 597 (571–629) | 597 (563–632) | 0.607 |
| Number of anti-glaucoma drug | 0.039 * |
* p < 0.05. n = number; IQR = interquartile range; BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; IOP = intraocular pressure; KP = keratic precipitates; ECD = endothelial cell density; CV = coefficient of variant; HEX = hexagonal ratio; CCT = central corneal thickness.
Figure 2Specular microscopy of case 7. (A) Before treatment, the corneal endothelium showed numerous dark cells as pseudoguttata. The endothelial cell density (ECD) was 2331 cell/mm2, with marked pleomorphism and polymegathism. (B) After ganciclovir treatment, the ECD increased to 2500 cell/mm2, and the coefficient of variation value and hexagonal ratio improved from 51% to 43% and 33% to 43%, respectively.
The Difference of Initial Clinical Manifestation Between the Steroid Subgroup and Non-steroid Subgroup.
| Clinical Manifestation | Steroid Group ( | Non-Steroid Group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IOP (mmHg, median (IQR)) | 29.00 (25.00–51.00) | 44.50 (33.00–48.00) | 0.245 |
| BCVA (LogMAR, median (IQR)) | 0.52 (0.30–0.52) | 0.46 (0.13–0.88) | 0.632 |
| Corneal edema grading | 0.626 | ||
| 2 | 0 | 1 | |
| KP | 7 | 8 | 1.000 |
| Iritis | 0.246 | ||
| 3+ | 1 | 0 | |
| ECD (mm2, median (IQR)) | 1969 (1621–2233) | 1976 (1647–2558) | 0.685 |
| CV (%, median (IQR)) | 47 (42–59) | 49 (41–54) | 0.870 |
| HEX (%, median (IQR)) | 34 (29–41) | 33 (27–50) | 0.871 |
| CCT (mm, median (IQR)) | 615 (597–629) | 591 (569–622) | 0.364 |
| Number of anti-glaucoma drug | 0.710 | ||
| 3 | 2 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | 2 |
n = number; IQR = interquartile range; BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; IOP = intraocular pressure; KP = keratic precipitates; ECD = endothelial cell density; CV = coefficient of variant; HEX = hexagonal ratio; CCT = central corneal thickness.
The Difference of Post-treatment Outcome Between the Steroid Subgroup and Non-steroid Subgroup.
| Outcome | Steroid Group ( | Non-Steroid Group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IOP (mmHg, median (IQR)) | 12.00 (10.00–17.00) | 12.00 (9.00–15.75) | 0.613 |
| BCVA (LogMAR, median (IQR)) | 0.15 (0.00–0.52) | 0.26 (0.02–0.62) | 0.867 |
| Corneal edema grading | 0.467 | ||
| KP | 3 | 3 | 0.622 |
| Iritis | 0.044 * | ||
| ECD (mm2, median (IQR)) | 1900 (1669–2747) | 1658 (1540–2464) | 0.281 |
| CV (%, median (IQR)) | 54 (45–58) | 43 (41–69) | 0.536 |
| HEX (%, median (IQR)) | 38 (37–60) | 39 (34–45) | 0.336 |
| CCT (mm, median (IQR)) | 610 (535–642) | 586 (566–599) | 0.397 |
| Number of anti-glaucoma drug | 0.034 * | ||
| Recurrence | 4 | 1 | 0.100 |
| Duration of GCV use (month, median (IQR)) | 24.5 (13.5–40) | 11 (9–13.5) | 0.002 * |
| Duration of steroid use (month, median (IQR)) | 19.5 (13.5–30) | 0.5 (0–1) | <0.001 * |
* p < 0.05. n = number; IQR = interquartile range; BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; IOP = intraocular pressure; KP = keratic precipitates; ECD = endothelial cell density; CV = coefficient of variant; HEX = hexagonal ratio; CCT = central corneal thickness; GCV = ganciclovir.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier Method comparing the recurrence rate of steroid and non-steroid group.