| Literature DB >> 36233476 |
Myriam Carpenito1, Valeria Cammalleri1, Luka Vitez2, Aurelio De Filippis3, Edoardo Nobile3, Maria Caterina Bono1, Simona Mega1, Matjaz Bunc2, Francesco Grigioni1,3, Gian Paolo Ussia1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The natural history of tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) is characterized by poor prognosis and high in-hospital mortality when treated with isolated surgery. We report the preliminary echocardiographic and procedural results of a prospective cohort of symptomatic patients with high to prohibitive surgical risk and at least severe TR who underwent transcatheter edge-to-edge repair through the TriClipTM system.Entities:
Keywords: echocardiography; edge-to-edge repair; transcatheter interventions; tricuspid regurgitation; tricuspid valve
Year: 2022 PMID: 36233476 PMCID: PMC9571515 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195609
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Baseline clinical characteristics.
| Patient Characteristics | N = 13 |
|---|---|
| Mean age, years ± SD | 81 ± 4 |
| Gender-female, | 11 (85) |
| BSA, m2 ± SD | 1.7 ± 0.2 |
| STS score, % median (Q1–Q3) | 5.8 (3.8–7.7) |
| EuroScore II, % ± SD | 8 ± 4 |
| Diabetes, | 4 (31) |
| Hypertension, | 12 (92) |
| Hyperlipidaemia, | 5 (38) |
| Coronary artery disease, | 4 (31) |
| Smoking, | 1 (8) |
| Atrial fibrillation, | 13 (100) |
| History of cerebrovascular insult, | 2 (15) |
| COPD, | 2 (15) |
| CIED, | 4 (31) |
| Previous TAVI implantation, | 3 (23) |
| NYHA functional class III or more, | 13 (100) |
|
| |
| Salicylic Acid, | 3 (23) |
| Novel oral anticoagulant, | 8 (62) |
| Warfarin, | 4 (31) |
| Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, | 6 (46) |
| Digoxin, | 3 (23) |
| Calcium channel blocker, | 3 (23) |
| Beta-blocker, | 11 (85) |
| Diuretic, | 13 (100) |
BSA: Body Surface Area; CIED: cardiac implantable electronic device; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NYHA: New York Heart Association; STS: Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score; TAVI: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
Echocardiographic data of n.13 patients between baseline and before hospital discharge.
| Echocardiographic Parameter | Pre-TriClip | Post-TriClip | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LVEF, % ± SD | 50 ± 7 | 49 ± 8 | 0.473 |
| TAPSE, mm ± SD | 16 ± 3 | 17 ± 3 | 0.150 |
| S’ wave, cm/s ± SD | 9.3 ± 2.4 | 9.5 ± 1.5 | 0.732 |
| FAC, % ± SD | 33 ± 8 | 36 ± 8 | 0.370 |
| PASP, mmHg ± SD | 43 ± 9.5 | 36.5 ± 9.1 | 0.034 |
| TAPSE/PASP, mm/mmHg ± SD | 0.37 ± 0.1 | 0.46 ± 0.1 | 0.011 |
| TR grade | |||
| 1 | 46% (6) | 0.001 | |
| 2 | 46% (6) | ||
| 3 | 69% (9) | ||
| 4 | 23% (3) | 8% (1) | |
| 5 | 8% (1) | ||
| TR VC, mm ± SD | 8 ± 1 | 4 ± 2 | <0.001 |
| TR EROA, cm2 ± SD | 0.63 ± 0.28 | 0.32 ± 0.21 | <0.001 |
| TV mean diastolic gradient, mmHg ± SD | 0.9 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 1.1 | 0.004 |
| TV V max, m/s ± SD | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 0.105 |
| TR volume, mL ± SD | 57 ± 16 | 28 ± 16 | <0.001 |
| Tricuspid annulus diameter, mm ± SD | 44 ± 5 | 40 ± 4 | <0.001 |
| RV length, mm ± SD | 60 ± 7 | 56 ± 6 | 0.08 |
| RV middle diameter, mm ± SD | 42 ± 6 | 35 ± 6 | 0.003 |
| RV basal diameter, mm ± SD | 47 ± 7 | 43 ± 4 | 0.001 |
| RV end diastolic area, cm2 ± SD | 19 ± 4 | 16 ± 3 | 0.049 |
| RA area, cm2 ± SD | 28 ± 8 | 26 ± 8 | 0.026 |
| IVC, mm ± SD | 22 ± 3 | 18 ± 5 | 0.004 |
EROA: effective regurgitant orifice area; FAC: fractional area change; IVC: inferior vena cava; LA: left atrium; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; PASP: pulmonary artery systolic pressure; RA: right atrium; RV: right ventricle; S’ wave: right ventricular systolic myocardial velocity; TAPSE: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; TR: tricuspid regurgitation; TV: tricuspid valve; VC: vena contracta.
Figure 1Echocardiographic pictures of successful TR reduction after TEER. Transthoracic echocardiographic four-chamber view at baseline (A) and at discharge (B) after implantation of one TriClip XT. Transoesophageal echocardiographic right ventricle inflow/outflow view showing severe tricuspid regurgitation mainly originating from septal and anterior leaflet at baseline (C) and traces of regurgitation after implantation of one device (D).
Adverse events and clinical safety endpoints at follow-up.
| Adverse Events and Clinical Status (N, %) | 30-Day Follow-Up | 6-Month Follow-Up (N = 10) |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular mortality | 0 | 0 |
| Myocardial infarction | 0 | 0 |
| Stroke | 0 | 0 |
| New onset renal failure | 0 | 0 |
| Nonelective surgery for tricuspid valve repair | 0 | 0 |
| Endocarditis requiring surgery | 0 | 0 |
| Major bleeding 1 | 0 | 0 |
| New onset of liver failure | 0 | 0 |
| Pulmonary thromboembolism | 0 | 0 |
| Device embolisation | 0 | 0 |
| Single leaflet device attachment | 1 (13%) | 0 |
1 One patient had a decrease in haemoglobin of 3–5 g/dL (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification type 3a).