Khodr Tello1, Jun Wan2, Antonia Dalmer1, Rebecca Vanderpool3, Hossein A Ghofrani1,4,5, Robert Naeije6, Fritz Roller7, Emad Mohajerani1, Werner Seeger1, Ulrike Herberg8, Natascha Sommer1, Henning Gall1, Manuel J Richter1. 1. Department of Internal Medicine (K.T., A.D., H.A.G., E.M., W.S., N.S., H.G., M.J.R.), Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany. 2. Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, National Pulmonary Embolism & Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Research Group, National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China (J.W.). 3. University of Arizona, Tucson (R.V.). 4. Department of Pneumology, Kerckhoff Heart, Rheuma and Thoracic Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany (H.A.G.). 5. Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom (H.A.G.). 6. Erasme University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium (R.N.). 7. Department of Radiology (F.R.), Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Germany. 8. Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Bonn, Germany (U.H.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ratios of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/echocardiographically measured systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PASP), fractional area change/invasively measured mean pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricular (RV) area change/end-systolic area, TAPSE/pulmonary artery acceleration time, and stroke volume/end-systolic area have been proposed as surrogates of RV-arterial coupling. The relationship of these surrogates with the gold standard measure of RV-arterial coupling (invasive pressure-volume loop-derived end-systolic/arterial elastance [Ees/Ea] ratio) and RV diastolic stiffness (end-diastolic elastance) in pulmonary hypertension remains incompletely understood. We evaluated the relationship of these surrogates with invasive pressure-volume loop-derived Ees/Ea and end-diastolic elastance in pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: We performed right heart echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 1 day before invasive measurement of pulmonary hemodynamics and single-beat RV pressure-volume loops in 52 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The relationships of the proposed surrogates with Ees/Ea and end-diastolic elastance were evaluated by Spearman correlation, multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic analyses. Associations with prognosis were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: TAPSE/PASP, fractional area change/mean pulmonary artery pressure, RV area change/end-systolic area, and stroke volume/end-systolic area but not TAPSE/pulmonary artery acceleration time were correlated with Ees/Ea and end-diastolic elastance. Of the surrogates, only TAPSE/PASP emerged as an independent predictor of Ees/Ea (multivariate odds ratio: 18.6; 95% CI, 0.8-96.1; P=0.08). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, a TAPSE/PASP cutoff of 0.31 mm/mm Hg (sensitivity: 87.5% and specificity: 75.9%) discriminated RV-arterial uncoupling (Ees/Ea <0.805). Patients with TAPSE/PASP <0.31 mm/mm Hg had a significantly worse prognosis than those with higher TAPSE/PASP. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographically determined TAPSE/PASP is a straightforward noninvasive measure of RV-arterial coupling and is affected by RV diastolic stiffness in severe pulmonary hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03403868.
BACKGROUND: The ratios of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)/echocardiographically measured systolic pulmonary artery pressure (PASP), fractional area change/invasively measured mean pulmonary artery pressure, right ventricular (RV) area change/end-systolic area, TAPSE/pulmonary artery acceleration time, and stroke volume/end-systolic area have been proposed as surrogates of RV-arterial coupling. The relationship of these surrogates with the gold standard measure of RV-arterial coupling (invasive pressure-volume loop-derived end-systolic/arterial elastance [Ees/Ea] ratio) and RV diastolic stiffness (end-diastolic elastance) in pulmonary hypertension remains incompletely understood. We evaluated the relationship of these surrogates with invasive pressure-volume loop-derived Ees/Ea and end-diastolic elastance in pulmonary hypertension. METHODS: We performed right heart echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging 1 day before invasive measurement of pulmonary hemodynamics and single-beat RV pressure-volume loops in 52 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The relationships of the proposed surrogates with Ees/Ea and end-diastolic elastance were evaluated by Spearman correlation, multivariate logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic analyses. Associations with prognosis were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: TAPSE/PASP, fractional area change/mean pulmonary artery pressure, RV area change/end-systolic area, and stroke volume/end-systolic area but not TAPSE/pulmonary artery acceleration time were correlated with Ees/Ea and end-diastolic elastance. Of the surrogates, only TAPSE/PASP emerged as an independent predictor of Ees/Ea (multivariate odds ratio: 18.6; 95% CI, 0.8-96.1; P=0.08). In receiver operating characteristic analysis, a TAPSE/PASP cutoff of 0.31 mm/mm Hg (sensitivity: 87.5% and specificity: 75.9%) discriminated RV-arterial uncoupling (Ees/Ea <0.805). Patients with TAPSE/PASP <0.31 mm/mm Hg had a significantly worse prognosis than those with higher TAPSE/PASP. CONCLUSIONS: Echocardiographically determined TAPSE/PASP is a straightforward noninvasive measure of RV-arterial coupling and is affected by RV diastolic stiffness in severe pulmonary hypertension. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03403868.
Entities:
Keywords:
acceleration; echocardiography; hypertension; magnetic resonance imaging; pressure
Authors: Pia Trip; Silvia Rain; M Louis Handoko; Cathelijne van der Bruggen; Harm J Bogaard; J Tim Marcus; Anco Boonstra; Nico Westerhof; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf; Frances S de Man Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2015-04-16 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Khodr Tello; Jens Axmann; Hossein A Ghofrani; Robert Naeije; Newroz Narcin; Andreas Rieth; Werner Seeger; Henning Gall; Manuel J Richter Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Lena Bosch; Carolyn S P Lam; Lingli Gong; Siew Pang Chan; David Sim; Daniel Yeo; Fazlur Jaufeerally; Kui Toh Gerard Leong; Hean Yee Ong; Tze Pin Ng; Arthur Mark Richards; Fatih Arslan; Lieng H Ling Journal: Eur J Heart Fail Date: 2017-06-08 Impact factor: 15.534
Authors: Henning Gall; Janine F Felix; Franziska K Schneck; Katrin Milger; Natascha Sommer; Robert Voswinckel; Oscar H Franco; Albert Hofman; Ralph T Schermuly; Norbert Weissmann; Friedrich Grimminger; Werner Seeger; Hossein A Ghofrani Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Kurt W Prins; Stephen L Archer; Marc Pritzker; Lauren Rose; E Kenneth Weir; Alok Sharma; Thenappan Thenappan Journal: J Heart Lung Transplant Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 10.247
Authors: Tim Lahm; Ivor S Douglas; Stephen L Archer; Harm J Bogaard; Naomi C Chesler; Francois Haddad; Anna R Hemnes; Steven M Kawut; Jeffrey A Kline; Todd M Kolb; Stephen C Mathai; Olaf Mercier; Evangelos D Michelakis; Robert Naeije; Rubin M Tuder; Corey E Ventetuolo; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Norbert F Voelkel; Anton Vonk-Noordegraaf; Paul M Hassoun Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Hannah T Oakland; Phillip Joseph; Robert Naeije; Ahmed Elassal; Marjorie Cullinan; Paul M Heerdt; Inderjit Singh Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2022-01-01
Authors: Manuel J Richter; Steven Hsu; Athiththan Yogeswaran; Faeq Husain-Syed; István Vadász; Hossein A Ghofrani; Robert Naeije; Sebastian Harth; Friedrich Grimminger; Werner Seeger; Henning Gall; Ryan J Tedford; Khodr Tello Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Juan C Grignola; Enric Domingo; Manuel López-Meseguer; Pedro Trujillo; Carlos Bravo; Santiago Pérez-Hoyos; Antonio Roman Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Remigiusz Kazimierczyk; Lukasz A Malek; Piotr Szumowski; Stephan G Nekolla; Piotr Blaszczak; Dorota Jurgilewicz; Marcin Hladunski; Bozena Sobkowicz; Janusz Mysliwiec; Ryszard Grzywna; Wlodzimierz J Musial; Karol A Kaminski Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2021-05-10 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Silvia Deaconu; Alexandru Deaconu; Alina Scarlatescu; Ioana Petre; Sebastian Onciul; Aura Vijiiac; Diana Zamfir; Gabriela Marascu; Corneliu Iorgulescu; Andrei Dan Radu; Stefan Bogdan; Radu Vatasescu Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2021-05-31 Impact factor: 4.241