| Literature DB >> 36233305 |
Lillian F Hyde1, Yang Kong1,2, Lihong Zhao1, Sriganesh Ramachandra Rao3,4, Jieping Wang1, Lisa Stone1, Andrew Njaa1, Gayle B Collin1, Mark P Krebs1, Bo Chang1, Steven J Fliesler3,4, Patsy M Nishina1, Jürgen K Naggert1.
Abstract
Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) are a heterogenous group of primarily autosomal recessive mendelian diseases caused by disruptions in the synthesis of lipid-linked oligosaccharides and their transfer to proteins. CDGs usually affect multiple organ systems and vary in presentation, even within families. There is currently no cure, and treatment is aimed at ameliorating symptoms and improving quality of life. Here, we describe a chemically induced mouse mutant, tvrm76, with early-onset photoreceptor degeneration. The recessive mutation was mapped to Chromosome 9 and associated with a missense mutation in the Dpagt1 gene encoding UDP-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine:dolichyl-phosphate N-acetyl-D-glucosaminephosphotransferase (EC 2.7.8.15). The mutation is predicted to cause a substitution of aspartic acid with glycine at residue 166 of DPAGT1. This represents the first viable animal model of a Dpagt1 mutation and a novel phenotype for a CDG. The increased expression of Ddit3, and elevated levels of HSPA5 (BiP) suggest the presence of early-onset endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. These changes were associated with the induction of photoreceptor apoptosis in tvrm76 retinas. Mutations in human DPAGT1 cause myasthenic syndrome-13 and severe forms of a congenital disorder of glycosylation Type Ij. In contrast, Dpagt1tvrm76 homozygous mice present with congenital photoreceptor degeneration without overt muscle or muscular junction involvement. Our results suggest the possibility of DPAGT1 mutations in human patients that present primarily with retinitis pigmentosa, with little or no muscle disease. Variants in DPAGT1 should be considered when evaluating cases of non-syndromic retinal degeneration.Entities:
Keywords: DPAGT1; ER stress; congenital disorders of glycosylation; inherited retinal disease; mouse genetics; sensitized chemical mutagenesis screen
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36233305 PMCID: PMC9570038 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231912005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Identification of the tvrm76 mutation and phenotypic characterization in the retina. (A) Genomic structure of Dpagt1. Whole exome sequencing revealed a missense mutation in exon 3 of Dpagt1 (E3, boxed in yellow) (B) The mutation results in a transition of adenine to guanine (c.497A > G, shaded in yellow) resulting in an amino acid substitution (aspartic acid (D) to glycine (G)) at residue 166. (C) DPAGT1 protein structure. Yellow arrow indicates location of variant domain. (D) Alignment of DPAGT1 amino acid sequences from different species around the tvrm76 variation. Blue arrow indicates location of D166G missense mutation. (E,F) A representative OCT image of a tvrm76 mutant compared to a wild-type (WT) littermate control. Double arrows indicate thickness of outer nuclear layer (ONL). INL, inner nuclear layer. (G–K) ERG recordings in tvrm76 mutants at 1 and 3 months of age. (G,I,J) Average scotopic rod response (flash stimuli: 0.25 cd.s/m2). (H,K) Average photopic cone response (flash stimuli: 10 cd.s/m2). Results are mean ± SEM. n = 5–9 **** p < 0.0001; ** p < 0.01; * p < 0.05 (Ordinary one-way ANOVA). (L) mRNA relative fold change (RFC) of Dpagt1 by qRT-PCR analysis. Results are mean ± SEM. n = 5 (p = 0.0819, Student t-test).
Figure 2Generation and phenotypic characterization of tvrm76 and a rod photoreceptor-specific Dpagt1 conditional knockout by funduscopy. (A) Breeding schematic for tvrm76 and Dpagt1 conditional knockout models. tvrm76, a recessive RP model, was identified through a phenotype-driven screen of putative mutants (putants) generated by chemical mutagenesis (ENU) of C57BL/6J mice and subsequent intercrossing. For localized disruption of Dpagt1 in photoreceptors, Dpagt1 was bred with a transgenic mouse expressing rhodopsin-iCre. Subsequently Rho icre (+) Dpagt1 heterozygous progeny were backcrossed to homozygous Dpagt- floxed mice to generate Rho iCre(+)-Dpagt1 mice (Rho+ flox/flox). For allelic testing, Rho iCre(+)- Dpagt1 mice were crossed with a Dpagt1 heterozygote to produce Rho iCre(+)-Dpagt1(Rho+ flox/tvrm76) compound heterozygotes. (B–J) Representative funduscopic images of central retina in mutant strains and controls at 1 and 3 months of age. (B,C) Dpagt1 homozygotes, (D) wild-type (+/+) littermates. (E,F) Compound heterozygous (Rho+ flox/tvrm76), (H,I) Rho+ Dpagt1-floxed homozygotes and (G) Rho+ flox/+ and (J) Rho- flox/flox controls.
Figure 3Histological analysis of homozygous Dpagt1 and homozygous Rho iCre(+)-Dpagt1 models shows progressive photoreceptor degeneration in the mid-periphery of the retina. (A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H and E stain) staining of posterior eye sections from Dpagt1 homozygotes, compound heterozygotes (Rho+ flox/tvrm76) and homozygous Rho iCre(+)-Dpagt1 (Rho+ flox/flox) models at postnatal day 14 (p14), one month (1mo), and three months (3mo) and three month littermate controls. (B) Quantification of ONL nuclei degeneration relative to INL. Scale bar = 50 μm. Values represent mean ±SEM; n = 3–6. * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA). IPL: inner plexiform layer; INL: inner nuclear layer; ONL: outer nuclear layer; RPE: retinal pigment epithelium.
Figure 4Protein glycosylation analysis in Dpagt1 homozygotes. (A,B) No difference detected in total or glycosylated protein levels observed by SDS-PAGE analyses in Dpagt1 homozygotes (2) and their wild-type (+/+) littermates (1) at four and two weeks of age. (C) Western blot of rhodopsin from Dpagt1 and compound heterozygotes (Rho+ flox/tvrm76) shows no glycosylation defect compared to the defect model and positive PNGase control at two weeks of age (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the 1 kDa shift for the opsin monomer (*) and the 2 kDa shift for the opsin dimer (**) after deglycosylation. (D) Immunostaining of muscle tissue whole mount (tibialis anterior) dissected from homozygous Dpagt1 vs. +/+ against α-Synaptophysin (green) and α-Bungarotoxin (BTX, green). Scale bar = 5 μm.
Figure 5Degenerative retinopathy as a possible consequence of ER-mediated stress response. (A) q-RTPCR analysis of ER stress-associated markers in homozygous Dpagt1 vs. wild-type. Results mean ± SEM (n = 5). Student t-test; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. (B) Immunostaining of HSPA5 (BiP) (red) in Dpagt1 homozygote vs. wild-type shows increased staining in the inner segments, INL, and RGC layers (white arrowheads). Blood vessel (white *). (C) TUNEL staining (purple) of cell apoptosis in the retina at fourteen days (p14) and one month (1mo) of age in Dpagt1 homozygotes compared with wild-type. Arrows point to apoptotic cells. Boxed area in lower panel shows TUNEL staining (white) without DAPI. Scale bar (B,C) = 50 μm.