| Literature DB >> 36233004 |
Irina M Yermak1, Anna O Kravchenko1, Eleonora I Khasina2, Ekaterina S Menchinskaya1, Evgeny A Pislyagin1, Ekaterina V Sokolova1, Galina N Likhatskaya1, Dmitry L Aminin1.
Abstract
The anti-inflammatory effects of the CRG/Ech complex in LPS-induced endotoxemia were investigated in vivo in mice and in vitro in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells and peritoneal macrophages. The results indicated that the CRG/Ech complex suppressed the LPS-induced inflammatory response by reducing the production of ROS and NO in the macrophages. Furthermore, the in vivo experiment indicated that the CRG/Ech complex minimized disorders of the physiological and metabolic processes in mice subjected to LPS intoxication and reduced the levels of proinflammatory cytokines in the mouse serum. The preventive administration of the CRG/Ech complex to mice prevented endotoxin-induced damage in the mouse model of endotoxemia, increased the mice's resistance to LPS, and prevented increases in the levels of proinflammatory cytokines (TNFα). In this work, we showed by the molecular docking that Ech interacted with carrageenan, and that H-donor and H-acceptor bonds are involved in the formation of the complex.Entities:
Keywords: NO; ROS; carrageenan; complex; cytokines; echinochrome; endotoxinemia; lipopolisaccharide; molecular docking
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36233004 PMCID: PMC9570226 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1(A)—Model of the Ech with the κ-CRG double helix fragment. The molecular surface of CRG is shown in grey. The structure of Ech is shown as stick in green. (B)—Ech binding site with κ-CRG. The structure of κ-CRG double helix residues is shown in orange and pink, Ech is shown as stick in green, water molecules and sodium ion are shown as specific in red and yellow. Hydrogen bonds are shown in dotted lines.
Figure 22D-diagram of contacts of Ech with the κ-CRG in the binding site and table of Ech interaction contacts.
Figure 3Effects of the CRG/Ech or Ech on intracellular ROS and NO formation in the murine macrophages cell line RAW 264.7 and peritoneal macrophages. The effects of the CRG/Ech or Ech on ROS formation into RAW264.7cells (A) and peritoneal macrophages (C) treated by 1 µg/mL LPS. The effects of the CRG/Ech or Ech on NO formation into RAW 264.7cells (B) and peritoneal macrophages (D) treated by 1 µg/mL LPS. Cells were incubated with CRG/Ech or Ech for 1 h at 37 °C, then 24 h with LPS. The data are shown as the means ± SE; *—p < 0.05.
Figure 4Effects of the CRG/Ech or Ech on intracellular ROS and NO formation in the murine macrophages cell line RAW 264.7 and peritoneal macrophages. The effects of the CRG/Ech or Ech on ROS formation into RAW264.7 cells (A) and peritoneal macrophages (C) treated by 1 µg/mL LPS. The effects of the CRG/Ech or Ech on NO formation into RAW 264.7 cells (B) and peritoneal macrophages (D) treated by 1 µg/mL LPS. Cells were incubated with CRG/Ech or Ech for 24 h at 37 °C, then 24 h with LPS. The data are shown as the means ± SE; *—p < 0.05.
The effect of CRG, Ech and CRG/Ech on some physiological parameters in mice intoxicated with E. coli LPS.
| Groups | Organo-Somatic Index, % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Liver | Thymus | Adrenals | |
| control | 4.81 ± 0.206 | 0.176 ± 0.011 | 0.023 ± 0.001 |
| LPS | 5.80 ± 0.306 * | 0.112 ± 0.008 * | 0.031 ± 0.002 * |
| LPS + CRG/Ech | 5.01 ± 0.208 | 0.163 ± 0.007 ** | 0.025 ± 0.001 ** |
| LPS + CRG | 4.92 ± 0.230 ** | 0.149 ± 0.006 ** | 0.026 ± 0.001 ** |
| LPS + Ech | 4.91 ± 0.225 ** | 0.155 ± 0.005 ** | 0.026 ± 0.001 ** |
LPS—E. coli lipopolysaccharide; CRG—carrageenan; Ech—echinochrome; CRG/Ech—complex (10:1); * mean ± SEM (n = 6 observations in “control” group, 7 observation in other groups);—p < 0.05—compared with «control», **—p < 0.05—compared with LPS used Student t-test.
The effect of the CRG, Ech and CRG/Ech complex on the content of energy metabolites in the liver of mice at LPS- endotoxemia.
| Groups | Metabolits, μmol/g | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ATP | Glycogen | Lactate | |
| control | 2.68 ± 0.13 | 220.7 ± 16.8 | 1.92 ± 0.12 |
| LPS | 1.96 ± 0.11 * | 150.8 ± 12.5 * | 2.63 ± 0.14 * |
| LPS + CRG/Ech | 2.60 ± 0.11 ** | 198.7 ± 13.3 ** | 2.14 ± 0.10 ** |
| LPS + CRG | 2.43 ± 0.12 ** | 180.4 ± 12.6 | 2.35 ± 0.10 |
| LPS + Ech | 2.50 ± 0.14 ** | 175.5 ± 10.3 | 2.44 ± 0.16 |
ATP—adenosine triphosphate, *—p < 0.05—compared with “control” group, ** p < 0.05 compared with “LPS” group used Student’s t-test.
Figure 5The levels of anti-inflammatory Il-10 (A) and pro-inflammatory TNF-α (B) cytokines in mice sera under oral administration of—CRG, Ech, CRG/Ech (24 h before injection of LPS). The dose of orally sample was 100 mg/kg. Values are means 6 SD (n 5 10). The data are shown as the means ± SE; * Significantly different from control (saline), p < 0.05.