| Literature DB >> 36232577 |
Yongguo Xue1,2, Huawei Gao3, Xinlei Liu1, Xiaofei Tang1, Dan Cao1, Xiaoyan Luan1, Lin Zhao2, Lijuan Qiu2,3.
Abstract
Soybeans are essential crops that supply protein and oil. The composition and contents of soybean fatty acids are relevant to human health and have a significant relationship with soybean oil processing and applications. Identifying quantitative trait locus (QTL) genes related to palmitic acid could facilitate the development of a range of nutritive soybean cultivars using molecular marker-assisted selection. In this study, we used a cultivar with higher palmitic acid content, 'Dongnong42', and a lower palmitic acid content cultivar, 'Hobbit', to establish F2:6 recombinant inbred lines. A high-density genetic map containing 9980 SLAF markers was constructed and distributed across 20 soybean chromosomes. The genetic map contained a total genetic distance of 2602.58 cM and an average genetic distance of 0.39 cM between adjacent markers. Two QTLs related to palmitic acid content were mapped using inclusive composite interval mapping, explaining 4.2-10.1% of the phenotypic variance in three different years and environments, including the QTL included in seed palmitic 7-3, which was validated by developing SSR markers. Based on the SNP/Indel and significant differential expression analyses of Dongnong42 and Hobbit, two genes, Glyma.15g119700 and Glyma.15g119800, were selected as candidate genes. The high-density genetic map, QTLs, and molecular markers will be helpful for the map-based cloning of palmitic acid content genes. These could be used to accelerate breeding for high nutritive value cultivars via molecular marker-assisted breeding.Entities:
Keywords: QTL; SLAF-seq; candidate gene; palmitic acid content; soybean
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36232577 PMCID: PMC9569734 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1The frequency distribution of palmitic acid content (x-axis, %) of the RIL population and parents in (A) 2017, (B) 2018, (C) and 2019. F: female parent (Dongnong42, DN42); M: male parent (Hobbit).
Statistical analysis of palmitic acid content (%) in the parent and RIL population over 3 years.
| Year | Parents | RILs | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DN42 | Hobbit | Mean | SD | Range | Skewness | Kurtosis | CV (%) | |
| 2017 | 11.99 | 9.32 | 9.97 | 0.8 | 1.69–11.2 | −6.17 | 61.25 | 0.08 |
| 2018 | 11.99 | 8.12 | 9.52 | 0.76 | 1.57–11.03 | −6.17 | 63.94 | 0.08 |
| 2019 | 10.86 | 8.92 | 9.92 | 0.81 | 1.9–11.69 | −5.25 | 51.7 | 0.08 |
Figure 2Distribution of SLAF and polymorphic SLAF markers in the genome. (A) The picture shows the distribution of SLAF labels. (B) Distribution of polymorphic SLAF labels. The abscissa is the length of the chromosome. Each yellow band represents a chromosome. The genome is divided according to the size of 1 M. The darker areas in the figure are the areas where the SLAF tags are concentrated.
Figure 3High density genetic map and collinearity analysis of the genetic map and genome. Distribution of markers on 20 chromosomes. (A) Black bars on each chromosome represent mapped SLAF-seq markers. The chromosome number is shown on the x-axis, and genetic distance (cM) is shown on the y-axis. (B) The x-axis represents the genetic distance of each linkage group. The y-axis represents the physical length of each linkage group, with the collinearity of genomic markers and genetic maps represented in scatter. Different colors represent different chromosomes or linkage groups.
Characteristics of the high-density genetic map.
| Chromosome | Number of Markers | Map Distance (cM) | Average Map Distance (cM) | Gap < 5 | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 539 | 184.4 | 0.34 | 100 | 4.53 |
| 2 | 170 | 102.71 | 0.6 | 99.41 | 6.15 |
| 3 | 754 | 106.6 | 0.14 | 100 | 2.93 |
| 4 | 136 | 156.16 | 1.15 | 100 | 3.24 |
| 5 | 319 | 117.18 | 0.37 | 99.06 | 12.36 |
| 6 | 356 | 137.53 | 0.39 | 99.72 | 5.46 |
| 7 | 401 | 131.11 | 0.33 | 99.75 | 5.23 |
| 8 | 190 | 128.56 | 0.68 | 100 | 3.26 |
| 9 | 420 | 96.8 | 0.23 | 100 | 3.24 |
| 10 | 269 | 117.89 | 0.44 | 98.88 | 12.47 |
| 11 | 145 | 116.45 | 0.8 | 99.31 | 5.2 |
| 12 | 134 | 98.46 | 0.73 | 96.99 | 7.57 |
| 13 | 684 | 146.24 | 0.21 | 99.85 | 6.49 |
| 14 | 699 | 112.55 | 0.16 | 99.71 | 8.86 |
| 15 | 414 | 149.5 | 0.36 | 100 | 4.95 |
| 16 | 845 | 123.57 | 0.15 | 100 | 2.93 |
| 17 | 969 | 136.54 | 0.14 | 100 | 4.53 |
| 18 | 1119 | 169.34 | 0.15 | 100 | 2.43 |
| 19 | 1093 | 158.84 | 0.15 | 99.73 | 11.84 |
| 20 | 324 | 112.15 | 0.35 | 100 | 4.53 |
| Total | 9980 | 2602.58 | 0.39 | 19.62 | 5.91 |
QTLs of the palmitic acid content of the RIL population in the period 2017–2019.
| QTL | Year | Chr. | Left Marker | Right Marker | Genetic Position (cM) | Physical Position (bp) | LOD | ADD | PVE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Start | End | Start | End | ||||||||
|
| 2017 | 10 | Marker7632755 | Marker7723217 | 76.341 | 76.341 | 39,427,048 | 39,517,256 | 2.298 | 0.174 | 4.151 |
|
| 2018 | 15 | Marker5381863 | Marker5394023 | 43.494 | 43.78 | 9,218,139 | 9,387,049 | 6.528 | 0.259 | 10.066 |
|
| 2019 | 15 | Marker5381863 | Marker5394023 | 43.494 | 43.78 | 9,218,139 | 9,387,049 | 3.999 | 0.261 | 9.526 |
Chr.: chromosome, LOD: logarithm of odds, PVE: phenotypic variance explained, ADD: additive effect.
Figure 4Validation of candidate region and analysis of linkage markers. (A) Ten polymorphic markers related to the candidate region with SLAF-seq used to verify the region and screen a QTL region between G420 and G483 markers. (B) The lines of the RIL population were divided into two groups based on G420 genotypes. The palmitic acid content of the two groups was significantly different. Student’s t-test, * p < 0.05. (C) The lines of the RIL population were divided into two groups based on G483 genotypes. The palmitic acid content of the two groups was significantly different. Student’s t-test, ** p < 0.01. The “A” and “B” represent the genotypes of DN42 and Hobbit, respectively.
SNPs and Indels in the candidate regions of Dongnong42 and Hobbit.
| Gene | SNP | Indel | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intergenic | Upstream | Downstream | Nonsynonymous | Synonymous | Intronic | 3′UTR | Intergenic | Upstream | Downstream | Non-Frameshift | Non-Frameshift | 5′ UTR | |
|
| 5 | 10 | 2 | 3 | |||||||||
|
| 3 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||
|
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
|
| 7 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 3 | |||||
|
| 14 | 23 | 2 | 5 | |||||||||
|
| 15 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 1 | ||||||
|
| 21 | 20 | 5 | 8 | 3 | ||||||||
| Total | 319 | 68 | 80 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 77 | 17 | 23 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
SNP and Indel numbers were contained in 2000 bp region upstream and downstream from the gene.
Figure 5The relative expression (y-axis) of the four genes in the candidate region between the growth period of R5–R6 (x-axis) in RNA-seq. (A) Expression level of Glyma.15g119500 at the seed development R5–R6 stage. (B) Expression level of Glyma.15g119600 at the seed developing R5–R6 stage. (C) Expression level of Glyma.15g119700 at the seed development R5–R6 stage. (D) Expression level of Glyma.15g119800 at the seed development R5–R6 stage. Bars mean SD. *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01.