| Literature DB >> 36232328 |
Jonas Krämer1, Ricardo Pommerening1, Reinhard Predel1.
Abstract
In the animal kingdom, intraspecific variation occurs, for example, between populations, different life stages, and sexes. For venomous animals, this can involve differences in their venom composition. In cases where venom is utilized in the context of mating, the differences in composition might be driven by sexual selection. In this regard, the genus Euscorpius is a promising group for further research, as some of these scorpions exhibit a distinct sexual dimorphism and are known to perform a sexual sting during mating. However, the venom composition of this genus remains largely unexplored. Here, we demonstrate that Euscorpius italicus exhibits a male-specific venom composition, and we identify a large fraction of the substances involved. The sex specificity of venom peptides was first determined by analyzing the presence/absence patterns of ion signals in MALDI-TOF mass spectra of venom samples from both sexes and juveniles. Subsequently, a proteo-transcriptomic analysis provided sequence information on the relevant venom peptides and their corresponding precursors. As a result, we show that several potential toxin precursors are down-regulated in male venom glands, possibly to reduce toxic effects caused to females during the sexual sting. We have identified the precursor of one of the most prominent male-specific venom peptides, which may be an ideal candidate for activity tests in future studies. In addition to the description of male-specific features in the venom of E. italicus, this study also includes a general survey of venom precursors in this species.Entities:
Keywords: Euscorpius; intraspecific variation; proteomic and transcriptomic analysis; sex specificity; toxin; venom composition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36232328 PMCID: PMC9570025 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231911020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1External telson morphology of E. italicus. (a) Comparison of male (left) and female (right) specimens with differently shaped telsi. (b) Male after adult molt with last instar exuvia. (c,d) Telson morphology of a single individual before (c) and after (d) molting into a male.
Figure 2Comparison of venom amount and consistency of the sexes of E. italicus. (a) Mean venom amount (error bars represent standard deviation) released by adult males (6 extractions; 2 specimens), adult females (12 extractions; 4 specimens), and juveniles (12 extractions; 4 specimens) during venom extraction. The values are based on three repeated extractions per specimen with an interval of one week between the extractions. (b) Venom consistency in males (right capillary; translucent) and females (left capillary; milky).
Figure 3Comparison of MALDI-TOF mass fingerprints (m/z 3000–10,000) of venom extracted from juvenile (a), female (b), and male E. italicus (c). Male-specific ion signals are highlighted in blue; ion signals that are missing in mass spectra of venom from males are highlighted in beige.
Figure 4Pie chart highlighting the fraction of venom precursors that were confirmed to be down- or up-regulated (“sex-specific”) in males of Euscorpius italicus (inner circle). In the outer circle, venom compounds are classified based on similarities to sequences from UniProt [19] entries.
Information on venom precursors up- [↑] or down-regulated [↓] in males of E. italicus. Specificity was assessed based primarily on repeatedly generated MALDI-TOF mass spectra of venom samples from both sexes and juveniles but was also supported by the statistically less significant transcriptomic and Quadrupole Orbitrap MS experiments. Precursors were identified by a combined proteomic and transcriptomic approach. Grey, signal peptide; blue letters, potential bioactive peptide; green and italic, amidation signal; yellow, cysteine (half of the disulfide bond); red letters, cleavage site. Black underlined, confirmed by MSMS; red underlined, confirmed only by MSMS of digested samples; dashed line, mass match in MALDI-TOF MS. The column Orbitrap MS indicates which of the four analyses confirmed the precursor sequence. D, digested samples; ND, samples without digestion; m, venom from males; f, venom from females. Assumed PTMs include amidation (A) and disulfide bridges (C–C).
| Name | BLAST Hit | Expression Level ♂ [tpm] | Expression Level ♀ [tpm] | Expression Level Negative | PTM | Predicted Mass | Orbitrap MS | Male Specificity (MALDI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U-Euscorpiustoxin-Ei1 | Putative potassium channel toxin ( | 349.45 | 4136.68 | - | C-C | 6478.97 | D (m/f), ND (m/f) | ↓ |
|
| ||||||||
| U-Euscorpiustoxin-Ei2a | Putative sodium channel toxin ( | 2771.21 | 13,995.7 | - | C-C | 8301.05 | D (m/f), ND (m/f) | ↓ |
|
| ||||||||
| U-Euscorpiustoxin-Ei2b | Antimicrobial peptide ( | 766.38 | 6848.29 | - | C-C | 9056.51 | D (m/f), ND (m/f) | ↓ |
|
| ||||||||
| U-Euscorpiustoxin-Ei3a | La1-like protein 15 ( | 8058.69 | 29,307.7 | 2.73 | C-C | 8637.12 | D (m/f), ND (m/f) | ↓ |
|
| ||||||||
| U-Euscorpiustoxin-Ei3b * | Putative La1-like peptide ( | 2320.13 | 18,041.9 | 3.49 | A, | 7942.79/ | D (m/f), ND (m/f) | ↓ |
|
| ||||||||
| Antimicrobial Peptide Ei1 | Putative non-disulfide bridge peptide ( | 2015.04 | 9050.66 | - | - | 2586.38 | D (m/f), ND (m/f) | ↓ |
| Antimicrobial Peptide Ei2a | Antimicrobial peptide UyCT3 ( | 1228.17 | 11,051.7 | - | A | 1474.82 | D (m/f), ND (m/f) | ↓ |
| Antimicrobial Peptide Ei2b | Antimicrobial peptide UyCT3 ( | 637.46 | 2871.02 | - | A | 1504.83 | D (m), | ↓ |
| Novel Venom Compound Ei1 * | - | 5.1 | 3418.27 | - | A, | 4085.01/ | D (f), | ↓ |
| U-Euscorpiustoxin-Ei4 | Putative Na+ channel toxin ( | 8482.11 | 60.96 | 17.54 | A, | 6683.95 | D (m/f), ND (m/f) | ↑ |
|
| ||||||||
| Putative Protease Inhibitor Ei1a | Chymotrypsin-elastase inhibitor ixodidin-like ( | 1712.29 | 218.501 | 88.11 | A, | 6563.75 | D(m) | ↑ |
| U-Euscorpiustoxin-Ei5 | AKTx ( | 1812.84 | 23.48 | 163.27 | C-C | 4301.78 | D (m), | ↑ |
|
| ||||||||
* Allelic difference (relevant amino acids highlighted in green).
Figure 5Venom extraction from E. italicus. (a) Fixation of specimens with rubber tubes. (b) Application of electricity with modified pincers and collection of released venom into glass capillaries.