Literature DB >> 26908290

Sexual dimorphism in venom chemistry in Tetragnatha spiders is not easily explained by adult niche differences.

Greta J Binford1, Rosemary G Gillespie2, Wayne P Maddison3.   

Abstract

Spider venom composition typically differs between sexes. This pattern is anecdotally thought to reflect differences in adult feeding biology. We used a phylogenetic approach to compare intersexual venom dimorphism between species that differ in adult niche dimorphism. Male and female venoms were compared within and between related species of Hawaiian Tetragnatha, a mainland congener, and outgroups. In some species of Hawaiian Tetragnatha adult females spin orb-webs and adult males capture prey while wandering, while in other species both males and females capture prey by wandering. We predicted that, if venom sexual dimorphism is primarily explained by differences in adult feeding biology, species in which both sexes forage by wandering would have monomorphic venoms or venoms with reduced dimorphism relative to species with different adult feeding biology. However, we found striking sexual dimorphism in venoms of both wandering and orb-weaving Tetragnatha species with males having high molecular weight components in their venoms that were absent in females, and a reduced concentration of low molecular weight components relative to females. Intersexual differences in venom composition within Tetragnatha were significantly larger than in non-Tetragnatha species. Diet composition was not different between sexes. This striking venom dimorphism is not easily explained by differences in feeding ecology or behavior. Rather, we hypothesize that the dimorphism reflects male-specific components that play a role in mating biology possibly in sexual stimulation, nuptial gifts and/or mate recognition.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Comparative; Feeding; Hawaii; Intersexual; Mating; Phylogeny

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26908290     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2016.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicon        ISSN: 0041-0101            Impact factor:   3.033


  6 in total

1.  Sexually dimorphic venom proteins in long-jawed orb-weaving spiders (Tetragnatha) comprise novel gene families.

Authors:  Pamela A Zobel-Thropp; Emily A Bulger; Matthew H J Cordes; Greta J Binford; Rosemary G Gillespie; Michael S Brewer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 2.  Insights into how development and life-history dynamics shape the evolution of venom.

Authors:  Joachim M Surm; Yehu Moran
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.250

3.  Equipped for Sexual Stings? Male-Specific Venom Peptides in Euscorpius italicus.

Authors:  Jonas Krämer; Ricardo Pommerening; Reinhard Predel
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 6.208

4.  Molecular gut content analysis indicates the inter- and intra-guild predation patterns of spiders in conventionally managed vegetable fields.

Authors:  Hafiz Sohaib Ahmed Saqib; Pingping Liang; Minsheng You; Geoff M Gurr
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-06-27       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 5.  Studying Smaller and Neglected Organisms in Modern Evolutionary Venomics Implementing RNASeq (Transcriptomics)-A Critical Guide.

Authors:  Björn Marcus von Reumont
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Proteotranscriptomic Insights into the Venom Composition of the Wolf Spider Lycosa tarantula.

Authors:  Dominique Koua; Rosanna Mary; Anicet Ebou; Celia Barrachina; Khadija El Koulali; Guillaume Cazals; Pierre Charnet; Sebastien Dutertre
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.