| Literature DB >> 36231849 |
Zheng Yang1,2, Xi Luo2, Hepeng Jia2, Yu Xie2, Ruifen Zhang2.
Abstract
Scholars are divided over whether narrative/storytelling occupies a central position in health-related behaviour or in the health-related issues discussed on social media platforms. This study explored Chinese COVID-19 vaccination expressions on Douyin, China's biggest short-video sharing social media platform, and found that narration is still the most important tool employed by Chinese users when talking about COVID-19 vaccinations on Douyin, emphasizing nationalism and widespread optimism. Most of the narratives employed by Chinese users come from a first-person perspective. Nationalism, as manifested in the support expressed for national policies, rather than the external platform characteristics of memetics, makes the Chinese users' expressions about COVID-19 vaccinations similar on Douyin. Douyin seems to have become a 'pilgrimage platform' for the Chinese public to express their patriotic sentiment and their trust in the country and the government.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19 vaccination; Douyin; imitation public; individualism–nationalism; memetics; narration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36231849 PMCID: PMC9566288 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The Health Belief Model (referring to Abraham et al., 2005) [70].
Coding categories and intercoder reliability.
| Coding Category | Coding Subcategory | Intercoder Reliability | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content | Information/Source | 0.95 | |
| Narrative | |||
| Source | Individual (general) | 0.98 | |
| Organization (general) | |||
| Individual (health-related) | |||
| Organization (health-related) | |||
| Attitude | Pro-vaccine | 0.92 | |
| Anti-vaccine | |||
| Neutral | |||
| HBM–Susceptibility | No | 0.99 | |
| Yes | |||
| HBM–Severity | No | 0.99 | |
| Yes | |||
| HBM–Perceived Benefits | Personal benefits | No | 0.83 |
| Yes | |||
| Other benefits | No | 0.91 | |
| Yes | |||
| Family benefits | No | 0.98 | |
| Yes | |||
| Community benefits | No | 0.99 | |
| Yes | |||
| National benefits | No | 0.87 | |
| Yes | |||
| HBM–Perceived Barriers | Concerns about vaccine’s safety | No | 0.91 |
| Yes | |||
| Refutation | |||
| Vaccine’s low effectiveness | No | 0.94 | |
| Yes | |||
| Refutation | |||
| Side effects | No | 0.90 | |
| Minor effects | |||
| Major effects | |||
| Refutation | |||
| Costs | No | 0.83 | |
| Time cost | |||
| Economic cost | |||
| Refutation | |||
| HBM–Self-efficacy | Steps to take vaccine | No | 0.87 |
| Yes | |||
| Accessibility | No | 0.83 | |
| Accessibility–general | |||
| Accessibility–country | |||
| Barriers to accessibility | |||
| HBM–Cue to action | National calls | No | 0.85 |
| Yes | |||
| Expert testimony | No | 0.92 | |
| Yes | |||
| Personal story | No | 0.92 | |
| Yes | |||
Narrative practices in the different categories of COVID-19 vaccination on Douyin.
| Individual (General) | Organization (General) | Individual (Health-Related) | Organization (Health-Related) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1669 (83.45%) | 292 (14.6%) | 25 (1.25%) | 14 (0.7%) | ||||
| Narrative | Non-narrative | Narrative | Non-narrative | Narrative | Non-narrative | Narrative | Non-narrative |
| 1539 (92.2%) | 130 (7.8%) | 223 (76.4%) | 69 (23.6%) | 11 (44%) | 14 (56%) | 12 (85.7%) | 2 (14.3%) |
Different narrative practices related to COVID-19 vaccinations on Douyin.
| Individual Narrative (General) (n = 1539) | ||||
| Narrative perspective | ||||
| First-person | Second-person | Other | ||
| 1501 (97.5%) | 29 (1.9%) | 9 (0.6%) | ||
| Narrative Content | ||||
| Vaccination process | Vaccination results | |||
| 1319 (85.7%) | 1466 (95.3%) | |||
| Organization narrative (general) (n = 223) | ||||
| Narrative perspective | ||||
| First-person | Second-person | Other | ||
| 165 (74.0%) | 11 (4.9%) | 47 (21.1%) | ||
| Narrative Content | ||||
| Vaccination process | Vaccination results | |||
| 201 (90.1%) | 176 (78.9%) | |||
Figure 2Example of the narratives (‘the first dose of vaccine has been completed’) used in the Chinese COVID-19 vaccination expressions on Douyin.
Figure 3Analysis framework of individualism–nationalism in Chinese COVID-19 vaccination expressions on Douyin.
Statistical results of individualism–nationalism among Chinese COVID-19 vaccination expressions on Douyin.
| Individualism-Related | Nationalism-Related | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Personal benefits | 9.1% (152) | National benefits | 20.4% (340) | ||
| Personal | Personal susceptibility | 0.1% (2) | National calls | 16.6% (278) | |
| Personal severity | 0.2% (3) | ||||
| Vaccine efficiency | 0.5% (8) | ||||
| Vaccine safety | 1.6% (27) | ||||
| Personal accessibility | 4.7% (78) | National accessibility | 24.6% (410) | ||
Figure 4Example of national accessibility in Chinese COVID-19 vaccination expressions on Douyin (‘Thanks to the great love of the country, the first dose of vaccine has been given’).
Statistical results of perceived barriers in the Chinese COVID-19 vaccination expressions on Douyin.
| HBM–Perceived Barriers | Concerns about vaccine’s safety | Yes | 14.6% (31) | |
| Refutation | 85.4% (181) | |||
| Vaccine’s low effectiveness | Yes | 24.1% (14) | ||
| Refutation | 75.9% (44) | |||
| Side effects | Minor effects | 22.8% (79) | ||
| Major effects | 1.1% (4) | |||
| Refutation | 76.1% (264) | |||
| Costs | Time cost | 40.7% (170) | ||
| Economic cost | 0.2% (1) | |||
| Refutation | 59.1% (247) |
Figure 5Example of refutation of side effects in Chinese COVID-19 vaccination expressions on Douyin.