| Literature DB >> 36231665 |
Abstract
The rapidly ageing population, the growing rate of divorce, and the longer life expectancy of women compared with men have resulted in a large proportion of older Chinese women being alone. The sexual health and intimacy needs of this group of women are ignored due to traditional Chinese cultural values that undermine older adults' needs for sex and intimacy, and the subordinate position of women in society. The present study used a quantitative survey method to investigate bio-psycho-social factors associated with divorced and widowed older Chinese women's sexual health and intimacy needs in two cities in Shanghai and Wuhan. The conceptual framework of this study was guided by cognitive stress theory, attachment theory, gender theory, socioemotional selectivity theory, objectification theory, and activity theory. We adopted a model involving demographic, biological, psychological, and social factors to unearth the mechanism influencing divorced and widowed older Chinese women's sexual health and intimacy needs. Data were collected between October 2020 and March 2021 via face-to-face surveys. A convenience sample of 278 (N = 278) divorced and widowed older Chinese women was recruited (166 in Shanghai and 112 in Wuhan). Sexual health and intimacy needs were associated with current relationship status, financial status, physical health, attachment style, neuroticism, mental health, social support, prior marital conflict, and gender norm attitude. Sexual behaviour was associated with age, number of children, financial status, physical health, attachment style, neuroticism, prior marital conflict, gender norm attitude, sexual knowledge, sexual attitude, and intimacy attitude as predictors. Most participants in this study seemed to have found new intimate partners with whom to continue participating in sexual activities after their divorce or widowhood. The present study is one of the first examples of empirical research to examine the sexual health and intimacy needs of older Chinese women who are divorced or widowed. The findings generated by this study will inform the design and implementation of appropriate social programs for this demographic, and provide invaluable insight for social workers, educators, sex therapists, healthcare professionals, community workers, and policymakers working with this population.Entities:
Keywords: active ageing; divorce; healthy ageing; older female; sexuality and intimacy in older adults; widowhood
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36231665 PMCID: PMC9564901 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Conceptual framework.
Demographic characteristics of sample participants.
| Characteristics | Participants | |
|---|---|---|
| City (%) | ||
| Shanghai | 59.7 | |
| Wuhan | 40.3 | |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 65.17 ± 4.52 | |
| Education Level (%) | ||
| Never Attended School | 0.7 | |
| Primary School | 18.0 | |
| Junior Middle School | 25.9 | |
| High school | 45.3 | |
| College | 10.1 | |
| Current Relationship Status (%) | ||
| Divorced | 55.0 | |
| Widowed | 45.0 | |
| Number of Children (%) | ||
| Zero | 0.4 | |
| One | 82.4 | |
| Two | 12.6 | |
| Three | 4.0 | |
| Four | 0.7 | |
| Finance Status (mean ± SD) | 53.42 ± 16.48 | |
Frequency of sexual behaviour.
| Sexual Behaviour | Frequency (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not at All | Once per Month | Once Less Than One Month | Once a Week | Once or Twice per Week | Three Times or More per Week | |
| Intercourse | 12.9 | 0.4 | 5.0 | 54.7 | 21.2 | 1.4 |
| Sexual Touch | 12.9 | 0.7 | 6.5 | 43.5 | 31.7 | 0.4 |
| Oral Sex | 12.9 | 1.1 | 15.1 | 44.6 | 21.9 | 0 |
| Orgasm | 12.9 | 2.2 | 13.3 | 47.1 | 19.4 | 0.7 |
| Use of Sex Objects | 12.9 | 1.4 | 19.1 | 40.6 | 21.2 | 0.4 |
| Sexual Initiation | 12.9 | 1.4 | 14.4 | 40.6 | 25.9 | 0.4 |
Multiple regression analyses for intimacy attitude.
| Independent Variables | Dependent Variable: Intimacy Attitude | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
| Beta | Beta | Beta | Beta | |
| Age | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.01 | 0.06 |
| Education Level | −0.02 | −0.03 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| Current Relationship Status | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Number of Children | −0.06 | −0.06 | −0.04 | 0.01 |
| Finance Status | 0.25 *** | 0.24 *** | 0.03 | −0.04 |
| Physical Health | 0.06 | |||
| Attachment Style | 0.28 *** | |||
| Neuroticism | 0.21 ** | |||
| Mental Health | 0.20 * | |||
| Social Support | 0.51 *** | |||
| Prior marital Conflict | 0.24 ** | |||
| Gender Norm Attitude | 0.23 * | |||
| Body Image | 0.11 | |||
| Model Statistics | ||||
| ∆R Square | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 0.26 |
| F | 4.00 | 3.48 | 9.11 | 11.59 |
| F Change | 4.00 | 0.89 | 16.44 | 19.65 |
Note: Beta = Standardized Coefficients Beta. Statistically significant (* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001).
Multiple regression analyses for general sexual behaviour.
| Independent Variables | Dependent Variable: General Sexual Behaviour | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | |
| Beta | Beta | Beta | Beta | Beta | |
| Age | −0.19 | −0.17 | −0.18 * | −0.11 | −0.25 ** |
| Education Level | 0.09 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Current Relationship Status | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.03 |
| Number of Children | −0.06 | −0.02 | −0.07 | −0.04 | −0.10 |
| Finance Status | 0.25 *** | 0.11 | 0.09 | −0.04 | 0.15 * |
| Physical Health | 0.48 *** | ||||
| Attachment Style | 0.32 *** | ||||
| Neuroticism | −0.37 *** | ||||
| Mental Health | 0.00 | ||||
| Social Support | −0.03 | ||||
| Prior marital Conflict | −0.24 *** | ||||
| Gender Norm Attitude | 0.65 *** | ||||
| Body Image | −0.04 | ||||
| Sexual Knowledge | 0.22 *** | ||||
| Sexual Attitude | 0.30 *** | ||||
| Intimacy Attitude | 0.26 *** | ||||
| Model Statistics | |||||
| ∆R Square | 0.24 | 0.42 | 0.46 | 0.77 | 0.37 |
| F | 17.72 | 33.10 | 28.90 | 98.28 | 20.59 |
| F Change | 17.72 | 82.32 | 35.70 | 148.67 | 19.21 |
Note: Beta = Standardized Coefficients Beta. Statistically significant (* p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001).