| Literature DB >> 36231286 |
Olga Krivonogova1, Elena Krivonogova1, Liliya Poskotinova1.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess different combinations of time estimation ability and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters in adolescents during developing of Internet addiction (IA). The study included adolescents aged 16-17 (n = 49) living in the southern region of Russia. IA was measured using the Chen Internet Addiction Scale (CIAS). An individual minute test (IM) was performed, and HRV was recorded. There are three groups that differ in HRV, IM duration and CIAS parameters. Minimal and moderate risk of IA development was detected against a background of a tendency towards vagotonia and prolonged IM time (Group I) and balanced autonomic nervous balance and optimal IM time (Group II). A balanced autonomic nervous balance and prolonged IM time were detected in the group of persons with a moderate risk of IA and a stable IA pattern (Group III). We assume that the development of IA in adolescents may be carried out by different neural mechanisms, including optimal autonomic nervous balance, but with primary impairment of cortical brain mechanisms of time perception.Entities:
Keywords: Internet addiction; adolescents; heart rate variability; time perception
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36231286 PMCID: PMC9565209 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191911977
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
CIAS subscale scores and IM duration in adolescents with different risks of IA a.
| Variables | Group I, | Group II, | Group III, | H Test, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
| CIAS, score | 40 (33; 45) | 39 (33; 43) | 59 (52; 67) b (1–2, 1–3) | 29.6 | 0.001 |
| Com, score | 8 (6; 9) | 6 (6; 9) | 12.5 (11; 14) b (1–3, 2–3) | 28.3 | 0.001 |
| Wit, score | 8 (6; 9) | 8 (7; 10) | 13.5 (12; 15) b (1–3, 2–3) | 27.7 | 0.001 |
| Tol, score | 7 (6; 9) | 6 (5; 8) | 10.5 (9; 12) b (1–3, 2–3) | 16.8 | 0.001 |
| IH-RP, score | 8.5 (7; 11) | 9 (8; 11) | 14 (10; 16) b (1–3, 2–3) | 17.8 | 0.001 |
| Tm, score | 7 (6; 8) | 6 (5; 9) | 10 (8; 13) b (1–3, 2–3) | 15.5 | 0.001 |
| IM, sec | 73 (66; 84) | 55 (50; 59) b (1–2) | 64.5 (60; 72) b (2–3) | 23.2 | 0.001 |
CIAS: Chen Internet Addiction Scale; IM: individual minute; IA: internet addiction; Com: compulsive use; Wit: withdrawal symptoms, Tol: tolerance; IH-RP: interpersonal and health-related problems; Tm: time management problems. a Data are presented as median (lower and upper quartiles). b Statistically significant difference between the groups: p < 0.001, the Mann–Whitney U test.
Heart rate variability parameters in 16–17-year-old adolescents with different risks of IA a.
| Variables | Group I, | Group II, | Group III, | H Test, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
| HR, bpm | 78.1 (67.3; 84.3) | 82.6 (76.5; 87.5) | 84.7 (79.1; 88.3) | 3.14 | 0.181 |
| rMSSD, Ms | 51.5 (44.2; 66.2) | 32.9 (20.2; 34.8) c (1–2) | 34.3 (30.1; 46.4) | 11.1 | 0.002 |
| pNN50, % | 33.9 (24.2; 37.8) | 10.1 (2.1; 14.1) c (1–2) | 13.2 (9.6; 27.3) | 11.5 | 0.002 |
| SDNN, Ms | 64.3 (56.7; 81.1) | 43.1 (36.1; 55.1) c (1–2) | 52.7 (42.2; 62.4) | 9.7 | 0.004 |
| SI, units | 64.1 (35.5; 77.1) | 127.6 (88.8; 224.2) b (1–2) | 104.5 (86.2; 161.8) | 7.9 | 0.011 |
| TP, ×1000, Ms2 | 3.5 (2.9; 6.9) | 1.7 (1.2; 2.4) c (1–2) | 2.1 (1.4; 3.2) b (1–3) | 12.7 | 0.001 |
| HF, ×1000, Ms2 | 1.7 (1.2; 2.2) | 0.4 (0.2; 0.6) c (1–2) | 0.7 (0.6; 1.1) c (2–3) | 14.8 | 0.001 |
| LF, ×1000, Ms2 | 1.1 (0.8; 2.8) | 0.5 (0.4; 0.9) b (1–2) | 0.7 (0.5; 1.1) b (1–3) | 10.6 | 0.005 |
| VLF, ×1000, Ms2 | 0.4 (0.2; 0.8) | 0.2 (0.1; 0.5) | 0.3 (0.2; 0.6) | 2.1 | 0.255 |
HR: heart rate; SDNN: standard deviation of all NN intervals; rRMSSD: the square root of the mean squared differences in successive NN intervals; pNN50: percentage of the number of pairs of consecutive cardio intervals differing by more than 50 ms; SI: stress index; TP: total power of HRV spectrum; HF: high frequency range of HRV spectrum; LF: low frequency range of HRV spectrum; VLF: very low frequency range of HRV spectrum. a Data are presented as median (lower and upper quartiles). b Statistically significant difference between the groups: p < 0.01, the Mann–Whitney Utest. c Statistically significant difference between the groups: p < 0.001, the Mann–Whitney U test.