| Literature DB >> 31673061 |
Gergely Darnai1,2,3, Gábor Perlaki4,5,6, András N Zsidó7, Orsolya Inhóf7, Gergely Orsi4,5,6, Réka Horváth8, Szilvia Anett Nagy4,5,6,9, Beatrix Lábadi7, Dalma Tényi8, Norbert Kovács8,4, Tamás Dóczi4,6, Zsolt Demetrovics10, József Janszky8,4.
Abstract
A common brain-related feature of addictions is the altered function of higher-order brain networks. Growing evidence suggests that Internet-related addictions are also associated with breakdown of functional brain networks. Taking into consideration the limited number of studies used in previous studies in Internet addiction (IA), our aim was to investigate the functional correlates of IA in the default mode network (DMN) and in the inhibitory control network (ICN). To observe these relationships, task-related fMRI responses to verbal Stroop and non-verbal Stroop-like tasks were measured in 60 healthy university students. The Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire (PIUQ) was used to assess IA. We found significant deactivations in areas related to the DMN (precuneus, posterior cingulate gyrus) and these areas were negatively correlated with PIUQ during incongruent stimuli. In Stroop task the incongruent_minus_congruent contrast showed positive correlation with PIUQ in areas related to the ICN (left inferior frontal gyrus, left frontal pole, left central opercular, left frontal opercular, left frontal orbital and left insular cortex). Altered DMN might explain some comorbid symptoms and might predict treatment outcomes, while altered ICN may be the reason for having difficulties in stopping and controlling overuse.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31673061 PMCID: PMC6823489 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52296-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The selection of the final sample. 602 subjects completed the online survey. 139 of them reported smoking habits or excessive alcohol drinking and 28 individuals did not fall within the expected age range (18–30). Since there was overlap between the groups (5 subjects), totally 162 subjects were excluded at this stage of the process. Finally, 30 male and 30 female participants with no neurological and psychiatric symptoms and no risk factors related to MRI measurements were chosen randomly from the remaining 440 subjects.
Figure 2Verbal Stroop and Non-verbal Stroop-like task: design and stimuli examples. The experiment started with a baseline session. It was followed by task sessions that were presented successively. Subjects had to choose the direction of the arrows (Stroop-like task) or ink color of the words (Stroop task).
Differences in task performances between conditions and correlations with PIUQ.
| Task | Condition | Mean (SD) or Median (min-max) | t/Z | rho |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Verbal Stroop RTa | Cong. | 0.87 (0.09) | 4.96*** | 0.077 |
| Incong. | 0.96 (0.17) | 0.077 | ||
| Verbal Stroop ERb | Cong. | 1 (0–18) | 5.80*** | −0.01 |
| Incong. | 5 (0–18) | −0.02 | ||
| Non-verbal Stroop RTa | Cong. | 0.65 (0.10) | 8.43*** | −0.11 |
| Incong. | 0.68 (0.10) | −0.12 | ||
| Non-verbal Stroop ERb | Cong. | 0 (0–4) | 4.16*** | 0.15 |
| Incong. | 1 (0–5) | 0.04 | ||
aPaired samples t-test, mean (SD) and t values are presented;
bWilcoxon signed-rank test, median (min-max) and Z scores are presented;
***p < 0.001, RT – reaction time, ER – error rate, PIUQ – Problematic Internet Use Questionnaire, rho – Spearman’s correlation coefficient.
Correlations between PIUQ and fMRI BOLD signal changes.
| Cluster | Area | #voxels | Max. Z-score | MNI coordinates | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| x | y | z | ||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| 1. | Left posterior cingulate gyrusa | 506 | 4.09 | 0 | −42 | 34 |
| Right precuneusa | 14 | −50 | 46 | |||
| Right posterior cingulate gyrusa | 434 | 3.78 | 8 | −40 | 30 | |
| 2. | Left precuneusa | −4 | −58 | 10 | ||
|
| ||||||
| 1. | Left precuneusa | 386 | 3.95 | −2 | −60 | 52 |
| Right precuneusa | 8 | −68 | 50 | |||
| 2. | Right middle frontal gyrusa | 378 | 4 | 40 | 8 | 38 |
| Right precentral gyrusa | 42 | 2 | 42 | |||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| 1. | Left inferior frontal gyrus pars opercularisb | 275 | 3.45 | −50 | 16 | 0 |
| Left frontal poleb | −36 | 40 | 8 | |||
| Left central opercular cortexb | −38 | 8 | 10 | |||
| Left frontal opercular cortexb | −42 | 24 | 2 | |||
| Left frontal orbital cortexb | −44 | 20 | −6 | |||
| Left insular cortexb | −42 | 10 | −2 | |||
|
| n.s. | |||||
aNegative correlation bpositive correlation; n.s. not significant; MNI coordinates are listed for the local maximas.
Figure 3Group level negative associations between PIUQ and BOLD signal changes during incongruent condition in verbal Stroop task (A) and non-verbal Stroop-like task (B). Group level positive associations between PIUQ and BOLD signal changes during incongruent_minus_congruent contrast in Stroop task (C). Images were thresholded using clusters determined by Z > 2.3 and a corrected cluster significance threshold of p = 0.05. Axial slices are shown in radiological convention for MNI slice coordinates from Z = 8 to 48 mm in (A), Z = 22 to 62 mm in (B) and Z = −16 to 24 mm in (C).