| Literature DB >> 36231185 |
Marta Tacão1, José Laço2, Pedro Teixeira1, Isabel Henriques3.
Abstract
Enterobacteriaceae resistant to third-generation cephalosporins are a great concern for public health, as these are first-line drugs to treat infections. The production of carbapenemases and extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and/or the overexpression of AmpC β-lactamases are the main mechanisms of resistance to these antibiotics. Among the ESBLs, CTX-M β-lactamases are the most prevalent worldwide. Our aims were to determine the prevalence of cefotaxime-resistant Enterobacteriaceae along a heavily polluted river and characterize blaCTX-M carriers. River water was collected in 11 sites along the main course and tributaries, in two sampling moments. Water quality was evaluated and a collection of cefotaxime-resistant isolates was obtained. blaCTX-M carriers were characterized regarding phylogenetic affiliation, clonality, antibiotic susceptibility, gene diversity, and context. Water presented very low quality in all sites. From 147 cefotaxime-resistant isolates, 46% carried blaCTX-M and were affiliated with Escherichia, Klebsiella, Enterobacter, and Citrobacter. Molecular typing revealed clonal isolates in different sites and over the two years, suggesting survival of the strains in the river or continuous pollution inputs from the same sources. Eight variants of blaCTX-M were found, with blaCTX-M-15 being the most prevalent (52.5%). Sites with a lower water quality showed the highest resistance rates and prevalence of blaCTX-M, suggesting that river water may embody human health risks.Entities:
Keywords: Enterobacteriaceae; antibiotic resistance; blaCTX-M; pig farms; river pollution; β-lactamases
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36231185 PMCID: PMC9565674 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191911858
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Sampling sites (P1–P15), coordinates, and other information and map showing sites (red dots) located in the Lis River main course (P1–P3, P6, P9, P12–P15) and tributaries (P4, P5, P7, P8, P10). WWTPs are indicated using yellow dots and the density of swine farms is in orange (from Teixeira et al., 2022 [39]).
Figure 2Proportion of cefotaxime-resistant bacteria determined in all sampling sites located in the Lis River from spring (P1) to mouth (P15) (P1–P3, P6, P9, P12–P15; black) and three affluents (P4/P5, P7/P8, and P10/P11; light grey); Sites located downstream WWTP and in the vicinities of pig farms are indicated by * and #, respectively.
Figure 3CTX-M encoding genes detected in the Lis riverine system. Black dots for Escherichia isolates, red for Klebsiella, and blue for Citrobacter or Enterobacter. Sites located downstream WWTP and in the vicinities of pig farms are indicated by * and #, respectively.
Description of blaCTX-M carriers isolated in the Lis River concerning isolation year and location, identification, antibiotic susceptibility profiles (black—resistant, grey—intermediate resistance, white—susceptible), and blaCTX-M variant detected and genomic context.
| Affiliation | Campaign Year | Site | Strain a | Antibiotic Susceptibility b |
| Genetic Environment of | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AML | AMC | PRL | TZP | TIC | TIM | ATM | CAZ | CTX | FEP | IPM | CN | CIP | TE | C | SXT | IS | IS | orf477 | IS | In | |||||
|
| 2018 | 1 | E1 | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | E2 * | −1 | + | + | A | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | E3 * | −32 | + | + | H | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | E4 | −65 | + | + | J | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | E5 * | −1 | + | + | A | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | E6 | −1 | + | + | A | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | E7 * | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | E8 * | −65 | + | + | J | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | E9 | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | E10 * | −14 | + | + | C | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | E11 | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | E12 | −15 | + | + | E | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | E13 * | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | E14 | nd | + | nd | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | E15 | −55 | + | + | I | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | E16 | −65 | + | + | J | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | E17 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | E18 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | E19 * | −32 | + | + | H | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | E20 | −15 | + | + | + | F | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 2 | E21 | −15 | + | + | D | |||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | E22 * | −27 | + | + | G | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | E23 * | −27 | + | + | G | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | E24 * | −55 | + | + | I | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | E25 | nd | + | nd | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | E26 | −32 | + | + | H | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | E27 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | E28 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | E29 | −27 | + | + | G | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | E30 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | E31 * | −65 | + | + | J | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | E32 | −1 | + | + | A | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2018 | 5 | K1 * | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | K2 | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | K3 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | K4 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | K5 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | K6 * | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 3 | K7 | −15 | + | + | D | |||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | K8 * | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | K9 | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | K10 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | K11 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | K12 | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | K13 | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 | K14 | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | K15 | −15 | + | + | + | F | |||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | K16 | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | K17 | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 | K18 | −15 | + | + | D | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 2018 | 12 | C1 | nd | + | nd | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2019 | 12 | C2 * | −3 | + | + | B | |||||||||||||||||||
| 12 | C3 * | nd | + | + | nd | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 13 | C4 * | −32 | + | + | H | |||||||||||||||||||
a AML—amoxicillin, AMC—amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, PRL—piperacillin, TZP—piperacillin/tazobactam, TIC—ticarcillin, TIM—ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, ATM—aztreonam, CAZ—ceftazidime, CTX—cefotaxime, FEP—cefepime, IPM—imipenem, CN—gentamicin, CIP—ciprofloxacin, TE—tetracycline, C—chloramphenicol, SXT—sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim; b strains used in conjugation assays are marked with *; c nd: not determined.
Figure 4Genomic environments for the variants of the blaCTX-M gene found in the isolates. Ten different environments were observed, and they are represented from (A–J).
Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of donor and transconjugant strains carrying bla genes and recipient strain E. coli CV601 (black—resistant, grey—intermediate resistance, white—susceptible).
| Antibiotic Susceptibility | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donor/Transconjugant Strains and | AML | AMC | PRL | TZP | TIC | TIM | ATM | CAZ | CTX | FEP | IPM | CN | CIP | TE | C | SXT | |
| E3D | |||||||||||||||||
| E3T | |||||||||||||||||
| E5 | |||||||||||||||||
| E5T | |||||||||||||||||
| E19 | |||||||||||||||||
| E19T | |||||||||||||||||
| E23 | |||||||||||||||||
| E23T | |||||||||||||||||
| E24 | |||||||||||||||||
| E24T | |||||||||||||||||
| K1 | |||||||||||||||||
| K1T | |||||||||||||||||
| K6 | |||||||||||||||||
| K6T | |||||||||||||||||
| C3 | |||||||||||||||||
| C3T | |||||||||||||||||
| C4 | |||||||||||||||||
| C4T | |||||||||||||||||
| Recipient strain | - | ||||||||||||||||
AML—amoxicillin, AMC—amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, PRL—piperacillin, TZP—piperacillin/tazobactam, TIC—ticarcillin, TIM—ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, ATM—aztreonam, CAZ—ceftazidime, CTX—cefotaxime, FEP—cefepime, IPM—imipenem, CN—gentamicin, CIP—ciprofloxacin, TE—tetracycline, C—chloramphenicol, SXT—sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim.