Literature DB >> 36231063

Advances in Concentration Gradient Generation Approaches in a Microfluidic Device for Toxicity Analysis.

Nicole M E Valle1,2, Mariana P Nucci1,3, Arielly H Alves1, Luiz D Rodrigues1, Javier B Mamani1, Fernando A Oliveira1, Caique S Lopes2, Alexandre T Lopes4, Marcelo N P Carreño4, Lionel F Gamarra1,2.   

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to analyze the development and functionality of microfluidic concentration gradient generators (CGGs) for toxicological evaluation of different biological organisms. We searched articles using the keywords: concentration gradient generator, toxicity, and microfluidic device. Only 33 of the 352 articles found were included and examined regarding the fabrication of the microdevices, the characteristics of the CGG, the biological model, and the desired results. The main fabrication method was soft lithography, using polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) material (91%) and SU-8 as the mold (58.3%). New technologies were applied to minimize shear and bubble problems, reduce costs, and accelerate prototyping. The Christmas tree CGG design and its variations were the most reported in the studies, as well as the convective method of generation (61%). Biological models included bacteria and nematodes for antibiotic screening, microalgae for pollutant toxicity, tumor and normal cells for, primarily, chemotherapy screening, and Zebrafish embryos for drug and metal developmental toxicity. The toxic effects of each concentration generated were evaluated mostly with imaging and microscopy techniques. This study showed an advantage of CGGs over other techniques and their applicability for several biological models. Even with soft lithography, PDMS, and Christmas tree being more popular in their respective categories, current studies aim to apply new technologies and intricate architectures to improve testing effectiveness and reduce common microfluidics problems, allowing for high applicability of toxicity tests in different medical and environmental models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CGG; concentration gradient generator; drug screening; microdevice; microdevice gradient generator; microfluidic device; toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36231063      PMCID: PMC9563958          DOI: 10.3390/cells11193101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cells        ISSN: 2073-4409            Impact factor:   7.666


  66 in total

Review 1.  Hazardous metal additives in plastics and their environmental impacts.

Authors:  Andrew Turner; Montserrat Filella
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 9.621

2.  Paclitaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  M Hussain; S Gadgeel; O Kucuk; W Du; W Salwen; J Ensley
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  An integrated microfluidic platform for evaluating in vivo antimicrobial activity of natural compounds using a whole-animal infection model.

Authors:  Jianping Yang; Zuanguang Chen; Poying Ching; Qiujia Shi; Xinchun Li
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 6.799

4.  Microfluidic platform integrated with worm-counting setup for assessing manganese toxicity.

Authors:  Beibei Zhang; Yinbao Li; Qidi He; Jun Qin; Yanyan Yu; Xinchun Li; Lin Zhang; Meicun Yao; Junshan Liu; Zuanguang Chen
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  An integrated microfluidic device in marine microalgae culture for toxicity screening application.

Authors:  Guoxia Zheng; Yunhua Wang; Zumin Wang; Weiliang Zhong; Hu Wang; Yajie Li
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 5.553

Review 6.  The present and future role of microfluidics in biomedical research.

Authors:  Eric K Sackmann; Anna L Fulton; David J Beebe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Control of stem cell fate and function by engineering physical microenvironments.

Authors:  JinSeok Park; Peter Kim; Wilda Helen; Adam J Engler; Andre Levchenko; Deok-Ho Kim
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Hyaluronan hydrogel: an appropriate three-dimensional model for evaluation of anticancer drug sensitivity.

Authors:  Laurent David; Virginie Dulong; Didier Le Cerf; Lionel Cazin; Marek Lamacz; Jean-Pierre Vannier
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  A Microfluidic Prototype System towards Microalgae Cell Separation, Treatment and Viability Characterization.

Authors:  Yanjuan Wang; Junsheng Wang; Chen Zhou; Gege Ding; Mengmeng Chen; Jiang Zou; Ge Wang; Yuejun Kang; Xinxiang Pan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 10.  Microfluidics for Biotechnology: Bridging Gaps to Foster Microfluidic Applications.

Authors:  Vera Ortseifen; Martina Viefhues; Lutz Wobbe; Alexander Grünberger
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.