| Literature DB >> 36230220 |
Juliana DePaula1, Sara C Cunha2, Adriano Cruz3, Amanda L Sales1, Ildi Revi4, José Fernandes2, Isabel M P L V O Ferreira2, Marco A L Miguel5, Adriana Farah1.
Abstract
Coffee is one of the most produced and consumed food products worldwide. Its production generates a large amount of byproducts with bioactive potential, like the fruit skin and pulp, popularly called cascara. This study aimed to evaluate the volatile and sensory profiles and the consumption potential of commercial Coffea arabica cascara teas by Rio de Janeiro consumers. Analyses of volatile organic compounds in unfermented (n = 2) and fermented (n = 4) cascara tea infusions were performed by GC-MS. RATA and acceptance sensory tests were performed with untrained assessors (n = 100). Fifty-three volatile organic compounds distributed in 9 classes were identified in different samples. Aldehydes, acids, alcohols, esters, and ketones prevailed in order of abundance. With mild intensity, the most cited aroma and flavor attributes were sweet, herbal, woody, prune, fruity, honey, toasted maté and black tea for unfermented teas. For the fermented teas, sweet, woody, black tea, prune, herbal, citric, fruity, honey, raisin, peach, toasted maté, tamarind, and hibiscus were rated as intense. A good association between the attributes selected by the assessors and the volatile compounds was observed. Unfermented teas, with a mild flavor and traditional characteristics, showed better mean acceptance (6.0-5.9 points) when compared to fermented teas (6.0-5.3 points), with exotic and complex attributes. These were well accepted (>8.0 points) by only about 20% of the assessors, a niche of consumers that appreciate gourmet foods.Entities:
Keywords: coffee cherry tea; coffee fruit; coffee husk; fermentation; infusion; volatile compounds
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230220 PMCID: PMC9563741 DOI: 10.3390/foods11193144
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Transverse cut of a Coffea arabica fruit, reproduced with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Samples of commercial fermented and unfermented coffee cascara teas produced in Latin America countries.
| Fermented | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sample | Origin/Cultivar | |
|
| Brazil/Mix of six cultivars: Iapar 59, Bourbon Amarelo, Catucaí Açu, Catuaí 44, Caturra, | |
|
| Bolivia/Nr/Sold in Canada | |
|
| El Salvador/Nr/Sold in the USA | |
|
| Nicaragua/Caturra and Bourbon/Sold in the USA | |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
|
| Brazil/Mix of six cultivars: Iapar 59, Bourbon Amarelo, Catucaí Açu, Catuaí 44, Caturra/Sold in Brazil | |
|
| Nicaragua/Caturra/Sold in the USA | |
|
| Brazil/IcatuPrecoce/Sold in Brazil | |
Nr: not reported.
Figure 2Infusions of commercial coffee cascara teas from Latin American countries. (A): sample 3—El Salvador (F); (B): sample 1—Brazil (F); (C): sample 4—Nicaragua (F); (D): sample 5—Brazil (UF); (E): sample 6—Nicaragua (UF); (F): sample 2—Bolivia (F). Note: F–fermented; UF—unfermented.
Results from physical-chemical analyses of commercial coffee cascara infusions produced in Latin American countries.
| Samples | Instrumental Color | SS (°Brix) | pH | TA (mEq NaOH/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70.97 ± 0.86 d | 52.11 ± 1.39 b | 88.47 ± 0.88 d | 1.17 ± 0.06 ab | 4.21 ± 0.01 a | 6.0 ± 0.3 c |
| 2 | 79.69 ± 0.50 a | 32.54 ± 1.50 d | 97.58 ± 0.70 a | 1.13 ± 0.06 c | 4.22 ± 0.01 a | 6.5 ± 0.0 b |
| 3 | 56.69 ± 1.50 f | 51.42 ± 0.23 b | 76.71 ± 1.61 f | 1.30 ± 0.00 a | 4.20 ± 0.00 a | 6.5 ± 0.1 b |
| 4 | 68.98 ± 1.19 e | 58.01 ± 1.46 a | 85.56 ± 1.19 e | 1.27 ± 0.06 a | 4.19 ± 0.01 ab | 7.2 ± 0.3 a |
| 5 | 73.68 ± 0.45 c | 45.75 ± 0.92 c | 90.96 ± 0.49 c | 1.20 ± 0.00 ab | 4.18 ± 0.01 b | 6.2 ± 0.3 bc |
| 6 | 77.89 ± 0.69 b | 34.27 ± 1.40 d | 96.03 ± 0.38 b | 1.10 ± 0.00 c | 4.22 ± 0.02 a | 7.0 ± 0.4 ab |
Note: L* (lightness), C* (chroma), H° (hue angle); SS (soluble solids); TA (titratable acidity). Different letters over the bars indicate statistical differences among samples by ANOVA (p≤ 0.05). Samples 1—Brazil (F); 2—Bolivia (F); 3—El Salvador (F); 4—Nicaragua (F); 5—Brazil (UF); 6—Nicaragua (UF). F—fermented; UF—unfermented.
Volatile compounds identified in infusions of fermented and unfermented commercial coffee cascara teas from Latin American countries and their classical odor description.
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fermented | Unfermented | |||||||||
| Volatile Compound | Odor Description | aCAS# | bELRI | cLRI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||
| Pentanal | Almond, pungent, coffee,chocolate [ | 110-62-3 | 749 | 873 | □ | ■d,e | □ | □ | □ | □ |
| Hexanal * | Green, vegetable, fruity, tallow, fat [ | 66-25-1 | 759 | 874 | ■e | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■d,e | □ | ■e |
| Hexenal | Apple, green [ | 505-57-7 | 892 | 920 | □ | ■e | □ | □ | □ | □ |
| Heptanal * | Fresh, herbal, fatty, citrus, wine-lees [ | 111-71-7 | 785 | 843 | ■e | ■e | ■d,e | □ | □ | ■e |
| Octanal * | Citrus, soap, lemon, herbal, honey [ | 124-13-0 | 726 | 805 | ■e | ■e | □ | ■e | □ | ■e |
| Nonanal * | Fat, citrus, fresh, orange, green [ | 124-19-6 | 798 | 880 | ■e | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■e | ■d,e | ■d,e |
| Decanal * | Sweet, citrus, floral, soap, orange [ | 112-31-2 | 797 | 838 | ■e | ■d,e | ■e | □ | □ | ■e |
| Undecanal | Floral, citrus, green, fresh [ | 112-44-7 | 847 | 901 | ■e | □ | □ | □ | □ | □ |
| Dodecanal * | Citrus, green, floral [ | 112-54-9 | 839 | 922 | ■e | ■e | □ | □ | ■e | ■e |
| Benzaldehyde * | Almond, burnt sugar, tropical fruit [ | 100-52-7 | 689 | 875 | ■e | ■e | ■d,e | ■e | ■e | ■e |
| α-methylbutanal | Cocoa, almond, malt, fermented [ | 96-17-3 | 683 | 836 | □ | ■d,e | □ | □ | □ | ■d,e |
| β-methylbutanal | Chocolate, peach [ | 590-86-3 | 742 | 861 | □ | □ | □ | □ | □ | ■d,e |
| Phenylethanal | Honey, sweet, floral, fermented [ | 122-78-1 | 741 | 880 | ■e | ■e | ■e | □ | □ | ■e |
| Safranal | Herb, sweet, fresh, spicy [ | 116-26-7 | 762 | 882 | □ | ■d,e | ■e | □ | □ | □ |
| (E)-cinnamaldehyde | Sweet, cinnamon, balsamic, honey [ | 14371-10-9 | 767 | 868 | □ | ■e | □ | □ | □ | □ |
| Vanillin * | Sweet, vanilla, creamy, chocolate [ | 121-33-5 | 652 | 721 | ■e | □ | □ | □ | ■e | □ |
|
| ||||||||||
| Acetic acid * | Acidic, sour, pungent, vinegar [ | 64-19-7 | 589 | 600 | ■e | ■e | ■d,e | ■d,e | □ | ■d,e |
| Hexanoic acid | Sour, fatty, sweat, cheesy [ | 142-62-1 | 817 | 848 | □ | ■e | ■d,e | □ | □ | □ |
| Heptanoic acid | Rancid, sour, cheesy, sweat [ | 111-14-8 | 785 | 750 | □ | ■e | □ | □ | □ | □ |
| Octanoic acid | Acid, sweat, cheese, fruity [ | 124-07-2 | 789 | 837 | ■e | ■d,e | ■e | ■e | □ | ■e |
| Nonanoic acid | Green, cheese, fatty [ | 112-05-0 | 800 | 830 | ■e | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■d,e | □ | ■e |
| Decanoic acid | Rancid, fatty, sour, citrus [ | 334-48-5 | 773 | 814 | ■d,e | ■e | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■d,e |
| Isovaleric acid | Sweet, acid, fermented, berry [ | 503-74-2 | 792 | 859 | □ | ■d,e | ■d,e | □ | □ | ■d,e |
| Isobutyric acid | Acidic, sour, cheese, rancid [ | 79-31-2 | 754 | 870 | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■d,e | □ | □ |
| Methylbutyric acid | Fruity, cheese, sweat [ | 759-05-7 | 787 | 839 | □ | □ | ■d,e | □ | □ | □ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 1,2-epoxylinalool | Floral, alcohol [ | 14049-11-7 | 755 | 767 | ■e | ■e | ■e | ■e | □ | □ |
| Phenylethylalcohol * | Honey, spice, rose, lilac, floral, fresh [ | 60-12-8 | 740 | 849 | ■e | ■e | ■e | ■e | ■e | ■e |
| 3-methylpentanol | Pungent, green, fruity [ | 589-35-5 | 790 | 919 | ■e | ■e | □ | □ | □ | □ |
| Ethylhexanol | Citrus, fresh, floral, rose, green [ | 104-76-7 | 819 | 906 | ■e | ■e | ■d,e | ■e | ■e | ■e |
| Benzyl alcohol | Floral, rose, balsamic, sweet [ | 100-51-6 | 830 | 855 | ■e | ■e | □ | □ | ■e | ■e |
| Lauryl alcohol | Fatty, waxy, honey, coconut [ | 112-53-8 | 797 | 929 | □ | ■e | ■e | □ | □ | □ |
|
| ||||||||||
| Methyl salicylate | Peppermint [ | 119-36-8 | 690 | 865 | ■d,e | ■d,e | □ | ■d,e | ■e | □ |
| Ethyl salicylate | Wintergreen, mint, floral, spicy [ | 118-61-6 | 792 | 955 | ■e | ■e | ■d,e | □ | ■e | ■d,e |
| Methyl octanoate | Orange, vegetable, herbal [ | 111-11-5 | 632 | 742 | □ | □ | ■e | □ | □ | □ |
| Ethyl octanoate | Fruity, banana, pear [ | 106-32-1 | 690 | 854 | □ | ■e | ■e | □ | □ | □ |
|
| ||||||||||
| Methyl palmitate | Waxy, fatty, candle [ | 112-39-0 | 851 | 888 | □ | □ | □ | □ | □ | ■e |
| Ethyl palmitate | Fruity, milky, balsamic [ | 628-97-7 | 573 | 635 | ■e | □ | ■e | ■e | □ | □ |
| Benzyl acetate | Fresh, boiled vegetable, fruity, floral [ | 140-11-4 | 622 | 722 | □ | ■e | □ | □ | □ | □ |
| Isopropyl myristate | Faint, oily, fatty [ | 110-27-0 | 714 | 782 | □ | □ | □ | □ | □ | ■d,e |
|
| ||||||||||
| Linalool * | Citrus, floral, lavender, sweet, green [ | 78-70-6 | 788 | 838 | ■e | ■e | □ | ■d,e | ■e | ■e |
| α-terpineol | Oil, anise, mint, lemon, citrus [ | 98-55-5 | 730 | 838 | □ | □ | □ | ■e | □ | □ |
| Menthol | Fresh, peppermint [ | 2216-51-5 | 761 | 801 | □ | □ | □ | □ | □ | ■e |
| β-ionone * | Sweet, violet, floral, raspberry [ | 14901-07-6 | 708 | 807 | □ | ■e | □ | □ | □ | □ |
|
| ||||||||||
| β-damascenone * | Apple, rose, honey, sweet, tobacco [ | 23726-93-4 | 823 | 927 | ■e | ■d,e | ■e | □ | □ | □ |
| γ-nonalactone | Coconut, peach, sweet [ | 104-61-0 | 827 | 899 | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■e | ■d,e | ■e | □ |
| Geranyl acetone | Magnolia, fruity, rose, pear, guava [ | 3796-70-1 | 758 | 873 | ■e | ■e | ■e | □ | □ | □ |
|
| ||||||||||
| Furfural | Bread, almond, sweet, woody [ | 98-01-1 | 867 | 902 | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■d,e | ■d,e |
| 5-methylfurfural | Almond, caramel, burnt sugar [ | 620-02-0 | 696 | 863 | □ | □ | □ | ■d,e | □ | □ |
| 2-acetylfuran | Balsamic, almond, nutty, toasted [ | 1192-62-7 | 670 | 848 | □ | □ | □ | ■e | □ | □ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 2-acetylpyrrole | Nutty, walnut, bread [ | 1072-83-9 | 680 | 835 | □ | □ | □ | ■e | ■d,e | □ |
| Formyl pyrrole | Chocolate [ | 1003-29-8 | 657 | 819 | □ | ■e | □ | □ | □ | □ |
|
| ||||||||||
| 2,3,5-trimethyl-pyrazine | Roast, potato, musty, nutty, cocoa [ | 14667-55-1 | 689 | 865 | □ | ■e | □ | □ | □ | □ |
| 2,6-dimethyl-pyrazine | Nutty, butter, cocoa, caramel [ | 5910-89-4 | 695 | 845 | □ | ■e | □ | □ | □ | □ |
Note: Samples: 1—Brazil (F); 2—Bolivia (F); 3—El Salvador (F); 4—Nicaragua (F); 5—Brazil (UF); 6—Nicaragua (UF). F—fermented; UF—unfermented. * Impact compounds according to Wang et al. [24]; Xiao et al. [49]; González-Mas et al. [50]; Márquez et al. [51]; Yang et al. [52]; Dongmo et al. [53]; Schieberle and Schuh [54]. Odor description according toFlavornet [47]; and The Good Scents Company Information System [48]; a CAS# (Chemical Abstracts Service) Registry Number, available in the NIST database [24]; bELRI: Experimental Linear Retention Index; cLRI: Linear Retention Index based on literature and NIST database [24]; dCompounds identified with probability more than 50%; eCompounds that provided a match factor higher than 600 and a match factor versus reversed match factor ratio greater than 0.8.
Assessor’scharacteristics.
| Gender | Age | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | 18–24 | 25–34 | 34–44 | 45–59 | ||
| 26% | 74% | 39% | 47% | 8% | 6% | ||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| 6% | 10% | 31% | 7% | 46% | |||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| 1% | 25% | 25% | 46% | ||||
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 30% | 16% | 54% | 12% | 33% | 55% | ||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 35% | 27% | 6% | 57% | 65% | 50% | 44% | 28% |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| 48% | 7% | 45% | 82% | 6% | 12% | ||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 51% | 4% | 45% | 53% | 47% | 45% | 55% | |
* Other infusions such as hibiscus, mint, bilberry, and horsetail. ** Consuming only bulk teas purchased in natural food stores or even from their gardens. *** Traditionally served cold and sweetened. **** Among those who sweetened, 77% reported using sugar and 23% sweeteners.
Figure 3Mean acceptance (A) and purchase intention (B) scores given for coffee cascara infusions by Brazilian consumers living in Rio de Janeiro. Different letters over the bars indicate statistical differences among samples by ANOVA (p ≤ 0.05) (n = 100 assessors). Samples: 1—Brazil (F); 2—Bolivia (F); 3—El Salvador (F); 4—Nicaragua (F); 5—Brazil (UF); 6—Nicaragua (UF). F—fermented; UF—Unfermented.
Figure 4Main aroma (A), flavor (B) and taste (C) attributes selected for all coffee cascara infusions by the assessors.
Figure 5Principal component analysis (PCA): bi-dimensional plot of samples of cascara coffee tea infusions (n = 6) (A) and sensory characteristics attributed by consumers (n = 100) through RATA sensory test, distributing volatile compounds and attributes that make up the best acceptance of samples among consumers (B). Overall liking and the volatile compounds were considered as supplementary variables. Samples: 1—Brazilfermented (F); 2—Bolivia (F); 3—El Salvador (F); 4—Nicaragua (F); 5—Brazilunfermented (UF); 6—Nicaragua (UF).