| Literature DB >> 34198992 |
Nina Buck1,2, Daria Wohlt1, Anne Ruth Winter1,3, Eva Ortner1.
Abstract
Wet coffee processing generates a large amount of coffee pulp waste that is mostly disposed of in the processing units. To reduce this waste and the associated environmental burden, an alternative strategy would be to exploit the coffee pulp to produce a durable and stable consumable product. Accordingly, a puree produced from Robusta coffee pulp was investigated in relation to its physicochemical and sensory properties. After thermal and chemical stabilization, the obtained puree (pH 3.6) was found to exhibit a multimodal particle size distribution, shear-thinning behavior, and lower discoloration, as well as an antioxidant capacity of 87.9 µmolTE/gDM. The flavor of the puree was examined by sensory evaluation and the corresponding analyses of aroma-active volatile compounds, as determined using aroma extract dilution analyses (AEDA) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry/olfactometry (GC-MS/O). The puree was characterized by dominant fruity (4.4), floral (3.4), citrusy (3.3) and hay-like (3.3) odor impressions. The aroma-active compounds were predominantly aldehydes, acids, and lactones, whereby (E)-β-damascenone, geraniol, 4-methylphenol, 3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethylfuran-2(5H)-one, and 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde exhibited the highest flavor dilution (FD) factor (1024), thereby indicating their high impact on the overall aroma of the puree. This study demonstrates an approach to stabilize coffee pulp to produce a sweet, fruity puree with comparable physical properties to other fruit purees and that can be used as a new and versatile flavoring ingredient for various food applications.Entities:
Keywords: Coffea canephora; aroma extract dilution analysis; by-product; coffee cherry; gas chromatography-olfactometry; residue; sustainability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34198992 PMCID: PMC8271582 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26133925
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Physicochemical properties of native and processed Robusta coffee pulp puree.
| Physiochemical Properties | Native | Processed |
|---|---|---|
| pH (−) | 4.95 ± 0.01 A | 3.57 ± 0.05 B |
| Dry matter content (%) | 6.27 ± 0.44 A | 5.50 ± 0.60 A |
| Total soluble solids (°Brix) | 0.48 ± 0.18 A | 0.88 ± 0.29 A |
| L* (−) | 32.63 ± 0.16 B | 36.03 ± 0.38 A |
| a* (−) | 15.03 ± 0.12 B | 16.92 ± 0.20 A |
| b* (−) | 17.53 ± 0.22 A | 21.64 ± 0.63 B |
| Antioxidant capacity (µmolTE/gDM) | 77.26 ± 0.36 B | 87.93 ± 3.95 A |
| d( | 167.76 ± 1.67 A | 164.94 ± 2.50 A |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD of two experiments. Means in the same row with no letter in common differ significantly (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Particle size distribution (a) and apparent viscosity over a shear rate range from 2.14 to 214 s−1 (b) of native and processed Robusta coffee pulp purees.
Figure 2Taste profile (a) and aroma profile (b) of a processed Robusta coffee pulp puree, perceived via retronasal evaluation. Note that the intensity scale has been adjusted to cover the range of rated intensities (maximum rated intensity of 4.7), rather than the full range available (10).
Aroma-active compounds and corresponding flavor dilution (FD) factors identified in the distillate obtained from the processed Robusta coffee pulp puree and from the unprocessed Robusta coffee pulp.
| RI a | Compound b | Odor Quality c | FD d Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DB-FFAP | DB-5 | Puree | Unprocessed Pulp | ||
| 1809 | 1387 | ( |
| 1024 | 1024 |
| 1833 | 1255 | geraniol |
| 1024 | 16 |
| 2078 | 1086 | 4-methylphenol |
| 1024 | 256 |
| 2185 | 1102 | 3-hydroxy-4,5-dimethylfuran-2( |
| 1024 | 512 |
| 2563 | 1400 | 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde |
| 1024 | ≥2048 |
| 1720 | 1030 | unknown |
| 512 | 256 |
| 1966 | 992 | 3-hydroxy-2-pyrone |
| 512 | <1 |
| 2340 | n.d. e | unknown |
| 512 | 512 |
| 2541 | 1254 | phenylacetic acid |
| 512 | 256 |
| 1534 | 1104 | linalool |
| 256 | 256 |
| 1802 | 1317 | ( |
| 256 | 512 |
| 2041 | 1175 | octanoic acid |
| 256 | 256 |
| 1301 | 955 | 2-heptanol |
| 128 | 16 |
| 1507 | 1178 | 2-isobutyl-3-methoxypyrazine |
| 128 | 256 |
| 1650 | 859 | 2/3-methylbutanoic acid |
| 128 | 256 |
| 1759 | 1196 | methyl salicylate |
| 128 | 512 |
| 1930 | 1488 |
| 128 | 256 | |
| 1853 | 1087 | 2-methoxyphenol |
| 64 | 8 |
| 1292 | 979 | 1-octen-3-one |
| 64 | 128 |
| 1445 | 905 | 3-(methylthio)propanal |
| 64 | 16 |
| 1523 | 1160 | ( |
| 64 | 64 |
| 1579 | 1106 | ( |
| 64 | 1024 |
| 1638 | 1050 | phenylacetaldehyde |
| 64 | 256 |
| 1690 | 1212 | ( |
| 64 | 4 |
| 2019 | 1360 |
| 64 | 128 | |
| 2156 | 1363 | eugenol |
| 64 | 256 |
| 2250 | n.d. e | unknown |
| 64 | 64 |
| 2447 | 1303 | indole |
| 64 | <1 |
| 2411 | 1705 |
| 32 | 16 | |
| 1231 | 896 | ( |
| 32 | <1 |
| 1413 | n.d. e | unknown |
| 32 | <1 |
| 1280 | 1002 | octanal |
| 16 | 16 |
| 1327 | 928 | 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline f |
| 16 | 8 |
| 1373 | 861 | ( |
| 16 | 16 |
| 1383 | 1103 | nonanal |
| 16 | 8 |
| 1753 | 1290 | ( |
| 16 | 512 |
| 1911 | 1142 |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 1986 | 1376 |
| 16 | 512 | |
| 2100 | n.d. e | unknown |
| 16 | <1 |
| 1618 | 808 | butanoic acid |
| 8 | 16 |
| 2129 | 1471 |
| 8 | 128 | |
| 984 | 720 | 2,3-butanedione f |
| 4 | 16 |
| 1418 | 1057 | ( |
| 4 | 64 |
| 1445 | 619 | acetic acid |
| 4 | 8 |
| 1733 | n.d. e | unknown |
| 4 | ≥2048 |
| 2172 | 1179 | 3-ethylphenol |
| 4 | 8 |
| 1015 | n.d. e | unknown |
| 2 | 2 |
| 1062 | n.d. e | unknown |
| 2 | 64 |
| 1080 | 801 | hexanal |
| 2 | <1 |
| 1140 | n.d. e | unknown |
| 2 | 8 |
| 1494 | 1016 | ( |
| 2 | <1 |
| 1489 | 1178 | 2- |
| 2 | 16 |
| 1552 | 854 | 2-methylpropanoic acid |
| 2 | 8 |
| 1904 | 1115 | phenylethanol |
| 2 | <1 |
| 1990 | n.d. e | unknown |
| 2 | <1 |
a RI: (linear) retention index. b Odorants were identified by comparison of their odor quality and intensity, RI on DB-FFAP and DB-5 capillaries, as well as mass spectra with data of the respective reference compounds. c Odor quality perceived at the odor detection port (ODP) during gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O). d Flavor dilution (FD) factor on a DB-FFAP capillary column. e n.d.: not determined. f No unequivocal mass spectrum was obtained; identification is based on the remaining criteria given in footnote b.
Figure 3Formation of 3-hydroxy-2-pyrone from l-ascorbic acid (modified from [47,48]).
Figure 4Schematic overview of the methodology used for this study.