| Literature DB >> 36230214 |
Xiaohu Zhou1,2,3,4, Chaohua Zhang1,3,5, Liangzhong Zhao2,4, Wenhong Cao1,3,5, Chunxia Zhou1,3,5, Xin Xie2,4, YuLian Chen2,4.
Abstract
Isoelectric solubilisation/co-precipitation (ISP) has been proven to be a better method than blending for preparing plant-animal dual-proteins, which can achieve synergies in the functional properties of heterologous proteins. This paper aims to investigate the effect of extraction pH on the functional properties of co-precipitated dual-protein. The basic composition, subunit composition, solubility, surface hydrophobicity, emulsification and gel properties of co-precipitated dual-protein (Co) prepared from pea and grass carp with pH (2.0, 3.0, 9.0, 10.0 and 11.0) were analysed in this study using ISP. The results showed that the functional properties of Co (Co9, Co10, Co11) prepared by alkali extraction were generally better than those prepared by acid extraction (Co2, Co3). Among them, Co10 has the highest vicilin/legumin α + β value and solubility, while having the lowest surface hydrophobicity, making its emulsification and gel properties superior to other extraction pH values. This study provides an important method reference for preparing plant-animal Co with exceptional functional properties.Entities:
Keywords: blended dual-protein; co-precipitated dual-protein; emulsifying properties; gel properties; grass carp; mixed protein; pea; plant protein; surface hydrophobicity
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230214 PMCID: PMC9562268 DOI: 10.3390/foods11193136
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the preparation of co-precipitated dual-protein (Co).
Figure 2Non-reduced electrophoretic map of PPI, CPI and Co prepared under different extraction pH conditions.
The relative optical density of Co non-reduced electrophoretic bands prepared under different extraction pH conditions (%).
| Sample | Aggregates | MHC | Convicilin | Leg α + β | Vicilin | AC | Leg α | TM | leg β | Others | Vicilin/Leg α + β |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co2 | 13.47 | 15.21 | 5.33 | 9.36 | 16.72 * | 13.33 | / | 21.50 | 5.07 | / | |
| Co3 | 11.92 | 19.36 | 6.28 | 8.34 | 18.47 * | 11.50 | / | 18.92 | 5.20 | / | |
| Co9 | 22.23 | 9.03 | 4.31 | 10.13 | 9.25 | 11.94 | 11.66 | 0.78 | 15.00 | 5.66 | 91.31 |
| Co10 | 17.45 | 13.75 | 4.01 | 5.74 | 15.22 | 15.87 | 12.54 | 4.60 | 6.01 | 4.80 | 265.16% |
| Co11 | 20.45 | 16.00 | 3.50 | 5.39 | 13.20 | 13.23 | 13.77 | 2.30 | 4.50 | 7.65 | 244.90 |
Note: * indicates the total value of vicilin and AC.
Chroma analysis of Co prepared under different extraction pH conditions.
| Sample | L* | a* | b* | Whiteness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Co2 | 69.36 ± 0.32 c | −0.65 ± 0.01 d | 11.07 ± 0.33 c | 67.42 ± 1.07 b |
| Co3 | 67.41 ± 0.09 d | −0.66 ± 0.00 d | 12.96 ± 0.24 b | 64.92 ± 0.55 c |
| Co9 | 68.57 ± 0.24 c | −0.47 ± 0.01 b | 21.23 ± 0.36 a | 62.07 ± 1.24 d |
| Co10 | 71.23 ± 0.19 b | −0.58 ± 0.02 c | 11.34 ± 0.29 c | 69.07 ± 1.47 a |
| Co11 | 74.21 ± 0.24 a | −0.44 ± 0.02 a | 12.92 ± 0.19 b | 71.15 ± 0.88 a |
Note: Different letters within the same column indicate that there is a significant difference between samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Solubility of Co prepared under different extraction pH conditions. Note: Different letters with the same pH indicate that there is a significant difference between samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 4Surface hydrophobicity of Co prepared under different extraction pH conditions. Note: Different letters indicate that there is a significant difference between samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 5EAI and ESI of Co prepared under different extraction pH conditions. Note: EAI of different samples with different capital letters has a significant difference (p < 0.05), ESI of different samples with different lowercase letters has a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 6Apparent viscosity of emulsion of Co prepared under different extraction pH conditions.
Figure 7Micromorphology of an emulsion of Co prepared under different extraction pH conditions.
Figure 8Water-holding capacity of heat-induced gel of Co prepared under different extraction pH conditions. Note: Different letters indicate that there is a significant difference between samples (p < 0.05).
Figure 9Texture properties of heat-induced gel of Co prepared under different extraction pH conditions. Note: Hardness of different samples with different capital letters has a significant difference (p < 0.05), and the springiness of different samples with different lowercase letters has a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Figure 10Microstructure of a heat-induced gel of Co prepared under various extraction pH conditions.