| Literature DB >> 36230108 |
Graziana Difonzo1, Giuditta de Gennaro1, Giusy Rita Caponio1, Mirco Vacca1, Giovanni Dal Poggetto2, Ignazio Allegretta1, Barbara Immirzi2, Antonella Pasqualone1.
Abstract
Globe artichoke roots represent an alternative and sustainable source for inulin extraction and are well-noted for their technological and functional properties. Therefore, the aim of our study was to exploit inulin with high degree of polymerization as a replacement of durum wheat semolina for the production of functional fresh pasta. The effect of increased level of substitution (5, 10, 15%) on cooking, structural, sensory, and nutritional properties were evaluated and compared with a control sample consisting exclusively of durum wheat semolina. Inulin addition caused changes to internal structure as evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The enriched samples showed a lower swelling index, an increasing cooking time, and values of cooking loss (2.37-3.62%), mainly due to the leaching of inulin into the cooking water. Cooked and raw enriched pasta was significantly darker and firmer than the control, but the sensory attributes were not negatively affected, especially at 5 and 10% of substitution levels. The increase of dietary fiber content in enriched pasta (3.44-12.41 g/100 g) resulted in a significant reduction of glycaemic index (pGI) and starch hydrolysis (HI). After gastrointestinal digestion, inulin-enriched pasta increased prebiotic growth able to significantly reduce E. coli cell density.Entities:
Keywords: functional pasta; glycemic index; high polymerization degree; inulin; prebiotics growth; waste reuse
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230108 PMCID: PMC9562900 DOI: 10.3390/foods11193032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) profile of artichoke roots inulin, considering the refractive index (red line) and the intrinsic viscosity (blue line).
Cooking properties of fresh pasta.
| Sample | OCT (min) | WAI (g/100 g) | SI | CL (g/100 g) | IL (g/100 g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC | 6.30 | 73.20 ± 0.01 a | 1.56 ± 0.03 a | 2.37 ± 0.05 d | - |
| P5 | 6.30 | 73.24 ± 0.10 a | 1.53 ± 0.04 ab | 2.70 ± 0.14 c | 1.01 ± 0.03 c |
| P10 | 6.45 | 72.51 ± 0.62 a | 1.48 ± 0.03 b | 3.11 ± 0.07 b | 1.45 ± 0.07 b |
| P15 | 6.45 | 73.24 ± 0.20 a | 1.47 ± 0.04 b | 3.62 ± 0.06 a | 2.19 ± 0.12 a |
PC, control pasta without inulin addition; P5, pasta with 5% of inulin added; P10, pasta with 10% of inulin added; P15, pasta with 15% of inulin added. OCT, optimal cooking time; WAI, water absorption index, SI, swelling index; CL, cooking losses; IL, inulin losses. The values represent means of triplicates ± standard deviation; different letters in the same column mean significant statistical differences (p < 0.05) to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test.
Color and firmness of fresh pasta.
| L* | a* | b* | Firmness | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Raw pasta | PC | 79.65 ± 0.09 a | 2.21 ± 0.07 e | 33.57 ± 0.46 a | 18.25 ± 0.45 b |
| P5 | 74.57 ± 0.19 c | 3.21 ± 0.02 c | 30.49 ± 0.26 b | 19.63 ± 0.50 a | |
| P10 | 72.02 ± 0.38 e | 3.89 ± 0.10 b | 28.52 ± 0.19 c | 19.89 ± 0.05 a | |
| P15 | 70.72 ± 0.25 f | 4.48 ± 0.08 a | 27.62 ± 0.09 cd | 19.77 ± 0.23 a | |
| Cooked pasta | PC | 78.89 ± 0.43 b | 0.30 ± 0.02 f | 27.11 ± 0.56 d | 5.85 ± 0.36 d |
| P5 | 73.69 ± 0.18 d | 2.00 ± 0.11 e | 24.13 ± 0.41 e | 6.22 ± 0.26 d | |
| P10 | 72.24 ± 0.06 e | 2.82 ± 0.11 d | 24.18 ± 0.33 e | 7.37 ± 0.48 c | |
| P15 | 68.12 ± 012 g | 3.79 ± 0.10 b | 22.29 ± 0.43 f | 7.25 ± 0.37 c | |
| P *C | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.05 |
PC, control pasta without inulin addition; P5, pasta with 5% inulin added; P10, pasta with 10% inulin added; P15, pasta with 15%= inulin added. P, percentage of inulin addition; C, cooking process. Values are expressed as mean of ± standard deviation; different letters in the same column mean significant statistical differences (p < 0.05) according to two-way ANOVA.
Figure 2Sensory characteristics of control (PC) and inulin-enriched (P5, P10, P15) fresh pasta. Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation; different letters for each parameters mean significant statistical differences (p < 0.05) to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 3SE-SEM micrographs of control (PC) and inulin enriched (P5, P10, P15) fresh pasta (white bar = 20 µm).
Proximate composition of fresh pasta (g/100 g).
| Parameters | PC | P5 | P10 | P15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ash | 0.41 ± 0.02 b | 0.41 ± 0.01 b | 0.49 ± 0.01 a | 0.50 ± 0.01 a |
| Protein | 10.75 ± 0.03 a | 9.71 ± 0.44 b | 9.25 ± 0.02 b | 9.27 ± 0.08 b |
| Total dietary fiber | 1.47 ± 0.04 d | 3.44 ± 0.10 c | 8.16 ± 0.12 b | 12.69 ± 0.08 a |
| Lipid | 0.23 ± 0.02 a | 0.10 ± 0.01 b | 0.06 ± 0.01 c | 0.08 ± 0.01 c |
| Moisture | 28.21 ± 0.17 a | 27.00 ± 0.21 b | 26.98 ± 0.10 b | 28.24 ± 0.30 a |
| Carbohydrates | 58.94 ± 0.22 a | 59.34 ± 0.25 a | 55.07 ± 0.02 b | 49.20 ± 0.42 c |
PC, control pasta without inulin addition; P5, pasta with 5% of inulin added; P10, pasta with 10% of inulin added; P15, pasta with 15% of inulin added. The values represent means of triplicates ± standard deviation; different letters indicate significant differences; different letters in the same column mean significant statistical differences (p < 0.05) to one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 4Results of hydrolysis index (HI) and predicted glycemic index (pGI) of control (PC) and inulin-enriched (P5, P10, P15) fresh pasta. The values represent means of triplicates ± standard deviation; different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) according to one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s HSD test.
Figure 5In vitro prebiotic assay showing the cell density of 22 probiotic lactic acid bacteria co-cultured with E. coli in fecal batches not containing carbohydrates (FM) or made with the addition of pasta without inulin (FMPC) and inulin-enriched pasta at 5 (FMP5), 10 (FMP10), and 15% (FMP15). “£” means >0.5 log10 cycle increased cell density (CFU/mL) of probiotic lactic acid bacte-ria in FMP15 versus FMP; “££” means >1 log10 cycle increased cell density (CFU/mL) of probiotic lactic acid bacteria in FMP15 versus FMP. “#” and “$” indicate those probiotics that had respective-ly determined a significant decrease of E. coli cell density in FMP15 or both FMP15 and FMP10. “*”: significant decrease of E. coli cell density compared to FMP; “ns”: no significant differences.