| Literature DB >> 36230006 |
Jiayin Pan1,2, Haining Xu1,2, Yu Cheng1,2, Benjamin Kumah Mintah3, Mokhtar Dabbour4, Fan Yang1,2, Wen Chen1,2, Zhaoli Zhang5, Chunhua Dai1,2, Ronghai He1,2, Haile Ma1,2.
Abstract
Due to the recent increase in the human population and the associated shortage of protein resources, it is necessary to find new, sustainable, and natural protein resources from invertebrates (such as insects) and underutilized plants. In most cases, compared to plants (e.g., grains and legumes) and animals (e.g., fish, beef, chicken, lamb, and pork), insect proteins are high in quality in terms of their nutritional value, total protein content, and essential amino acid composition. This review evaluates the recent state of insects as an alternative protein source from production to application; more specifically, it introduces in detail the latest advances in the protein extraction process. As an alternative source of protein in food formulations, the functional characteristics of edible insect protein are comprehensively presented, and the risk of allergy associated with insect protein is also discussed. The biological activity of protein hydrolyzates from different species of insects (Bombyx mori, Hermetia illucens, Acheta domesticus, Tenebrio molitor) are also reviewed, and the hydrolysates (bioactive peptides) are found to have either antihypertensive, antioxidant, antidiabetic, and antimicrobial activity. Finally, the use of edible insect protein in various food applications is presented.Entities:
Keywords: ace-inhibition activity; allergenicity; biological activity; extraction; functional characteristics; insect protein
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230006 PMCID: PMC9562009 DOI: 10.3390/foods11192931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Proximate compositions and micronutrients (minerals and vitamins) of some edible insects (based on dry matter).
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximate composition | Proteins (%) | 48.70–58.00 | 41.44 | 64.38–70.75 | 47.70–49.08 |
| Fatty acids (%) | 30.10–35.00 | 35.69 | 18.55–22.8 | 35.17–37.7 | |
| Fibers (%) | 2.00 | 0.08 | 5.00–14.96 | ||
| Ashes (%) | 4.00–8.60 | 7.87 | 3.57–5.10 | 2.36–3.00 | |
| Carbohydrate (%) | 1.00 | 12.85 | 2.60 | 7.09–7.10 | |
| Energy (kJ/kg) | 23,236.74 | 19,057.89 | 22,863.14 | ||
| Minerals (mg/100 g) | Calcium | 158.00 | 2295.00 | 132.14–210.00 | 44.36–47.18 |
| Potassium | 478.00 | 1126.62 | 761.54–895.01 | ||
| Magnesium | 207.00 | 220.00 | 80.00–109.42 | 210.24–221.54 | |
| Phosphor | 474.00 | 547.00 | 780.00–957.79 | 697.44–748.03 | |
| Sodium | 204.00 | 435.06 | 125.38–140.94 | ||
| Iron | 26.00 | 27.00 | 6.27–11.23 | 5.41–5.51 | |
| Zinc | 23.00 | 6.90 | 18.64–21.79 | 11.41–13.65 | |
| Manganese | 0.71 | 13.06 | 2.97–3.73 | 0.92–1.36 | |
| Copper | 0.15 | 1.12 | 0.85–2.01 | 1.60–1.64 | |
| Selenium | 0.15 | 0.07 | 0.60 | 0.03–0.07 | |
| Vitamins | Retinol (μg/100 g) | 118.00 | 24.33 | ||
| α-Tocopherol (IU/kg) | 80.39 | 63.96–81.00 | |||
| Ascorbic acid (mg/100 g) | 9.74 | 3.15–6.15 | |||
| Thiamin (mg/100 g) | 0.13 | 0.31–0.63 | |||
| Riboflavin (mg/100 g) | 11.07 | 0.41–2.13 | |||
| Niacin (mg/100 g) | 0.95 | 12.59 | 10.59–10.68 | ||
| Pantothenic acid | 7.47 | 3.72–6.88 | |||
| Biotin (μg/100 g) | 55.19 | 78.74–94.87 | |||
| Folic acid (mg/100 g) | 0.49 | 0.30–0.41 | |||
| Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ |
Essential amino acid contents of edible insects as compared with other food proteins (egg whites and soybeans) and with the FAO standard protein (mg/gprotein).
| Essential Amino Acids |
|
|
|
| Egg White | Soybean | Amino Acids Required in Human Nutrition (FAO) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| His | 25.8–29.5 | 33.0 | 21.0 | 35.3–37.9 | 22.0 | 25.0 | 15.0 |
| Thr | 28.4–31.2 | 42.0 | 35.0 | 34.8–40.8 | 47.0 | 38.0 | 23.0 |
| Val | 39.8–40.9 | 66.0 | 60.0 | 66.3–69.0 | 68.0 | 43.0 | 39.0 |
| Lys | 47.3–50.0 | 65.0 | 56.0 | 60.9–64.9 | 70.0 | 63.0 | 45.0 |
| Ile | 32.3–33.0 | 41.0 | 42.0 | 46.7–49.4 | 53.0 | 47.0 | 30.0 |
| Leu | 48.9–52.7 | 75.0 | 73.0 | 77.7–82.2 | 88.0 | 85.0 | 59.0 |
| Phe | 28.4–29.0 | 36.0 | 33.0 | 40.8–43.7 | |||
| Trp | 6.8–7.5 | 9.0 | 6.0 | 9.2–10.3 | 14.0 | 11.0 | 6.0 |
| Cys | 8.6–9.1 | 30.0 | 21.0 | 8.2–10.9 | |||
| Phe + Tyr | 60.2–62.5 | 110.0 | 74.0 | 118.5–123.6 | 91.0 | 97.0 | 38.0 |
| Cys + Met | 21.6–22.6 | 47.0 | 36.0 | 22.3–30.5 | 66.0 | 68.0 | 22.0 |
| Reference | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
Note: His, histidine; Thr, threonine; Val, valine; Lys, Lysine; Ile, Isoleucine; Leu, leucine; Phe, phenylalanine; Trp, tryptophan; Cys, cysteine; Tyr, tyrosine; Met, methionine.
Figure 1The proposed process to quantify the nutritious proteins from insects: digestible protein content = (Total N–non-digestible N) x conversion factor [31].
Figure 2Schematic representation of the mechanism by which SPPH III induces apoptosis in MGC-803 cells [77].