| Literature DB >> 36229636 |
David M Jaramillo1,2, Jose C B Dubeux3, Martin Ruiz-Moreno3, Nicolas DiLorenzo4, Joao M B Vendramini5, Lynn Sollenberger6, Cheryl Mackowiak7, Luana M D Queiroz3, Daciele S Abreu3, Liza Garcia3, Erick R S Santos8, Burney A Kieke9.
Abstract
Stable isotopes are useful for estimating livestock diet selection. The objective was to compare δ13C and δ15N to estimate diet proportion of C3-C4 forages when steers (Bos spp.) were fed quantities of rhizoma peanut (Arachis glabrata; RP; C3) and bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum; C4).Treatments were proportions of RP with bahiagrass hay: 100% bahiagrass (0%RP); 25% RP + 75% bahiagrass (25%RP); 50% RP + 50% bahiagrass (50%RP); 75% RP + 25% bahiagrass (75%RP); and 100% RP (100% RP). Feces, plasma, red blood cell (RBC), and hair were collected at 8-days intervals, for 32 days. Two-pool mixing model was utilized to back-calculate the proportion of RP based on the sample and forage δ13C or δ15N. Feces showed changes using δ13C by 8 days, and adj. R2 between predicted and observed RP proportion was 0.81 by 8 days. Plasma, hair, and RBC required beyond 32-days to reach equilibrium, therefore were not useful predictors of diet composition during the study. Diets were best represented using fecal δ13C at both 8-days and 32-days. By 32-days, fecal δ15N showed promise (R2 = 0.71) for predicting diet composition in C3-C4 diets. Further studies are warranted to further corroborate fecal δ15N as a predictor of diet composition in cattle.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36229636 PMCID: PMC9562360 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-21051-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Chemical composition of the five treatment diets offered to beef steers, each with increasing proportion of rhizoma peanut (RP) hay into bahiagrass hay.
| % Rhizoma peanut hay in bahiagrass hay | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% RP | 25% RP | 50% RP | 75% RP | 100%RP | |
| DM, % | 91 ± 0.02 | 92 ± 0.02 | 91 ± 0.01 | 91 ± 0.02 | 91 ± 0.02 |
| OM, % DM | 94 ± 0.01 | 93 ± 0.06 | 93 ± 0.06 | 92 ± 0.07 | 91 ± 0.07 |
| CP, % DM | 8.4 ± 0.018 | 9.0 ± 0.001 | 9.2 ± 0.003 | 11.1 ± 0.021 | 12.0 ± 0.007 |
| IVDOM, % | 46.4 ± 1.2 | 53.8 ± 1.4 | 56.5 ± 1.1 | 63.6 ± 1.8 | 67.8 ± 1.0 |
| δ13C, ‰ | −16.04 ± 0.36 | −19.39 ± 0.75 | −22.14 ± 0.83 | −26.22 ± 0.55 | −29.41 ± 0.50 |
| δ15N, ‰ | −0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.38 ± 0.08 | 0.52 ± 0.01 | 1.55 ± 0.04 | 1.71 ± 0.08 |
Means indicate average of 10 samples ± standard deviation.
IVDOM in vitro digestible organic matter, estimated utilizing the two-stage technique described by Moore and Mott [41].
Figure 1δ13C (a) and δ15N (b) feces of beef cattle consuming increasing proportions of rhizoma peanut (RP) in bahiagrass hay. Day of collection represents the number of days after dietary change. Asterisk indicates treatment differences (P ≤ 0.05) exist within the day of collection.
Figure 4δ13C of hair from beef cattle consuming increasing proportions of rhizoma peanut (RP) in bahiagrass hay. Day of collection represents the number of days after dietary change. Asterisk indicates treatment differences (P ≤ 0.05) exist within the day of collection.
Figure 2δ13C (a) and δ15N (b) plasma of beef cattle consuming increasing proportions of rhizoma peanut (RP) hay in bahiagrass hay. Day of collection represents the number of days after dietary change. Asterisk indicates treatment differences (P ≤ 0.05) exist within the day of collection.
Figure 3δ13C of red blood cells (RBC) of beef cattle consuming increasing proportions of rhizoma peanut (RP) in bahiagrass hay. Day of collection represents the number of days after dietary change.
δ13C and δ15N composition of red blood cells from beef steers consuming increasing proportions of rhizoma peanut (RP) hay in bahiagrass hay.
| Diet typeA | Red blood cells | |
|---|---|---|
| δ13C (‰) | δ15N (‰) | |
| 0% RP | −16.09 | 6.26a |
| 25% RP | −15.84 | 6.07ab |
| 50% RP | −15.88 | 5.94ab |
| 75% RP | −16.28 | 5.82bc |
| 100% RP | −15.95 | 5.57c |
| SEM | 0.309 | 0.142 |
| 0.84 | 0.04 | |
| LB | 0.87 | 0.004 |
| QC | 0.85 | 0.68 |
Values are averages across five evaluations.
AIndicates percent (%) inclusion of rhizoma peanut (RP) hay into bahiagrass.
BL, indicates P value of linear polynomial contrast.
CQ, indicates P value of quadratic polynomial contrast.
a–eMeans within a column followed by a common letter are not significantly different, according to LSD at the 5% significance level.
Analytic regression analysis results for 16 combinations of isotope (13C or 15N), day (8 or 32), and sample type (feces, plasma, red blood cell (RBC), or hair).
| Isotope | Day | Sample type | Intercepta | Slopea | Adjusted R2 | Pearson correlation coefficient | Concordance correlation coefficient (95% BCa bootstrap CI) | Mean squared errorb | MCc | SCc | RCc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13C | 8 | Fecal | −0.259 | 0.825 | 0.84 | 0.92 | 0.88 (0.79,0.93) | 359.04 | 33.1% | 13.2% | 53.7% |
| 13C | 8 | Plasma | 60.258 | 3.988 | 0.82 | 0.91 | 0.13 (0.08,0.18) | 3,558.88 | 77.7% | 16.4% | 6.0% |
| 13C | 8 | RBC | 49.254 | −0.998 | −0.01 | −0.18 | −0.02 (−0.09,0.02) | 3,950.97 | 65.2% | 4.2% | 32.7% |
| 13C | 8 | Hair | 51.107 | 0.577 | 0.09 | 0.35 | 0.12 (0.02,0.49) | 3,873.15 | 69.6% | 2.2% | 28.2% |
| 13C | 32 | Fecal | −1.666 | 0.851 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.86 (0.76,0.92) | 375.27 | 30.7% | 8.4% | 60.9% |
| 13C | 32 | Plasma | 37.874 | 1.773 | 0.94 | 0.97 | 0.38 (0.28,0.49) | 2,110.74 | 86.3% | 10.4% | 3.3% |
| 13C | 32 | RBC | 45.830 | 3.616 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 0.06 (0.02,0.11) | 3,438.17 | 69.4% | 6.3% | 24.3% |
| 13C | 32 | Hair | 27.112 | 1.318 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.51 (0.39,0.67) | 1,398.24 | 76.2% | 4.0% | 19.8% |
| 15N | 8 | Fecal | 13.285 | 0.543 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.39 (−0.06,0.73) | 1,487.73 | 21.0% | 12.2% | 66.8% |
| 15N | 8 | Plasma | 332.172 | −1.036 | 0.15 | −0.43 | −0.01 (−0.02,−0.00) | 51,386.09 | 96.3% | 1.7% | 2.9% |
| 15N | 8 | RBC | 331.505 | −1.308 | 0.30 | −0.58 | −0.02 (−0.04,−0.01) | 29,412.35 | 92.8% | 4.4% | 5.7% |
| 15N | 8 | Hair | 79.550 | −0.125 | 0.05 | −0.30 | −0.03 (−0.17,−0.00) | 51,913.15 | 80.9% | 17.0% | 2.5% |
| 15N | 32 | Fecal | −3.297 | 0.933 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.83 (0.69,0.92) | 406.13 | 12.9% | 1.2% | 85.9% |
| 15N | 32 | Plasma | −73.325 | 0.562 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.01 (−0.01,0.02) | 29,870.18 | 95.9% | 0.1% | 4.0% |
| 15N | 32 | RBC | 112.677 | −0.279 | 0.13 | −0.40 | −0.04 (−0.10,−0.02) | 35,909.90 | 85.2% | 11.9% | 4.0% |
| 15N | 32 | Hair | 58.494 | −0.050 | 0.00 | −0.22 | −0.04 (−0.09,0.03) | 63,761.22 | 56.4% | 41.7% | 2.1% |
BCa bias accelerated and corrected.
aFrom a model regressing actual on predicted dietary proportions. Ideal intercept value is 0.0, ideal slope value is 1.0.
bMean squared error where ‘error’ is the predicted minus actual dietary proportion.
cMC, SC, RC are mean, slope, random components of the MSE (as percentages).
Analytic regression analysis results of predicted vs. actual proportions of rhizoma peanut into bahiagrass hay diets consumed by beef cattle.
| Description | δ13C | δ15N | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 8, fecal without truncation of invalid percentages | Day 8, fecal with truncation of invalid percentages | Day 32, fecal without truncation of invalid percentages | Day 32, fecal with truncation of invalid percentages | Day 32, fecal without truncation of invalid percentages | Day 32, fecal with truncation of invalid percentages | |
| Intercept (ideal value is 0.0)a | −0.259 | −5.718 | −1.666 | −9.980 | −3.297 | −4.708 |
| Slope (ideal value is 1.0)a | 0.825 | 0.980 | 0.851 | 1.056 | 0.933 | 0.956 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.71 |
| Pearson correlation coefficient | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.85 |
| Concordance correlation coefficient (95% BCa bootstrap CI) | 0.88 (0.79,0.93) | 0.90 (0.78,0.96) | 0.86 (0.76,0.92) | 0.89 (0.75,0.96) | 0.83 (0.69,0.92) | 0.83 (0.68,0.91) |
| Mean squared error (MSE)b | 359.04 | 241.23 | 375.27 | 238.92 | 406.13 | 403.33 |
| MCc | 33.1% | 19.5% | 30.7% | 19.4% | 12.9% | 13.1% |
| SCc | 13.2% | 0.2% | 8.4% | 1.2% | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| RCc | 53.7% | 80.3% | 60.9% | 79.4% | 85.9% | 86.4% |
| Mean actual-predicted difference | −10.90 | −6.86 | −10.74 | −6.80 | −7.23 | −7.26 |
| Equivalence region specified for the TOST test | −15.0, 15.0 | −15.0, 15.0 | −15.0, 15.0 | −15.0, 15.0 | −15.0, 15.0 | –15.0, 15.0 |
| P-value for the TOST test (Ho: non-equivalence, Ha:equivalence) | 0.1035 | 0.0043 | 0.1039 | 0.0040 | 0.0298 | 0.0298 |
| Minimum equivalence region required to declare equivalence at the 0.05 level | −16.31, −5.48 | −11.72, −1.99 | −16.37, −5.11 | − 11.65, −1.96 | −13.95, −0.51 | −13.95, −0.57 |
Fecal samples were analyzed for δ13C and δ15N and diets were reconstructed using two-pool mixing models. Truncated values indicate predicted values re-assigned appropriate boundary value, where predicted proportions of < 0% were assigned a value of 0% and those > 100% were assigned a value of 100%.
aFrom a model regressing actual on predicted dietary proportions.
bMean squared error where 'error' is the predicted minus actual dietary proportion.
cMC, SC, RC are mean, slope, random components of the MSE (as percentages), respectively.