| Literature DB >> 36225946 |
Lalit Kala Pandey1, Khaga Raj Sharma1.
Abstract
In Nepal, about 700 plant species have been reported to be used for the primary care of different diseases. However, many of them have not been studied yet for their scientific evidence. The main aim of this study is the quantitative analysis of flavonoids and phenolic content, antioxidant, and antidiabetic activities of the extracts of four different medicinal plants, namely, Pogostemon benghalensis, Aleuritopteris bicolor, Crateva unilocularis, and Rungia pectinata growing in Nepal. The methanol extracts of plant samples were prepared by the hot percolation method using the Soxhlet apparatus. The phytochemicals of the plant extracts were analysed by colour differentiation methods using different analytical reagents. The phenolic content was estimated by using Folin-Ciocalteu's phenol reagent and the flavonoid was estimated by the aluminium chloride colorimetric method. The 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging assay was used to evaluate the antioxidant potential. The α-amylase enzyme inhibition activity was performed to evaluate the antidiabetic activity of plant extracts. The amount of total phenolics and flavonoids content was found to be the highest in Pogostemon benghalensis (169.43 ± 3.58 mg GAE/g and 65.2 ± 2.0 mg QE/g), respectively, which also showed the most potent free radical scavenging activity (IC50 35.92 ± 0.65 μg/mL). The extract of Aleuritopteris bicolor showed the highest α-amylase inhibitory activity (IC50 651.58 ± 10.32 μg/mL) whereas Crateva unilocularis and Pogostemon benghalensis exhibited moderate activity. The extract of Rungia pectinata showed the least activity towards α-amylase inhibition. Some of the medicinal plants selected in this study showed high TPC and TFC values with potent biological activities. To the best of our knowledge, these medicinal plants have the least exposure to their biological activities, and the results provide scientific evidence for the traditional uses of these plants against diabetes and infectious diseases. However, a detailed study can be performed in these plants to isolate the active chemical compounds and to evaluate in vivo pharmacological activities to know the active drug candidates for the future drug development process.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36225946 PMCID: PMC9550511 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4000707
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ScientificWorldJournal ISSN: 1537-744X
Figure 1Plant samples used in the study.
List of plants used in the study, local name, voucher specimen no., and scientific name.
| S. N. | Voucher specimen no. | Scientific name (family) | Local name |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | LKP1 (KATH) |
| Rudhilo |
| 2. | LKP2 (KATH) |
| Ranisinka |
| 3. | LKP3 (KATH) |
| Siplighan |
| 4. | LKP4 (KATH) |
| Ukuchi jhar |
The list of plants selected for the study, quantity of extracts and yield values.
| Plant samples/extracts | Quantity of sample (g) | Quantity of extract (g) | Colour of extract | Percentage yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 100 | 17.89 | Black | 17.89 |
|
| 100 | 11.08 | Black | 11.08 |
|
| 100 | 7.79 | Yellow | 7.79 |
|
| 100 | 6.33 | Dark green | 6.33 |
Phytochemical analysis of the plant extracts.
| Group of compounds |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | + | − | + | + |
| Saponins | + | − | + | - |
| Polyphenols | + | + | + | + |
| Diterpenes | + | − | + | - |
| Glycosides | + | + | + | + |
| Coumarins | + | + | + | + |
| Tannins | + | − | + | + |
| Flavonoids | + | + | + | + |
| Reducing sugar | + | + | − | + |
+ = presence, − = absence.
Figure 2Standard calibration curves of gallic acid and quercetin. (a) Calibration curve of standard gallic acid (b) calibration curve of standard quercetin.
The TPC and TFC values of the plant extracts.
| Plant samples/extracts | TPC (mg GAE/g) | TFC (mg QE/g) |
|---|---|---|
|
| 169.43 ± 3.58 | 65.2 ± 2.0 |
|
| 105.71 ± 0.57 | 48.27 ± 2.27 |
|
| 143.52 ± 0.87 | 57.47 ± 1.51 |
|
| 111.52 ± 1.57 | 47.87 ± 2.57 |
IC50 values against the DPPH free radical scavenging activity of the plant extracts.
| Plant samples | IC50 for DPPH radical scavenging ( |
|---|---|
|
| 35.92 ± 0.65 |
|
| 87.72 ± 2.32 |
|
| 67.55 ± 0.70 |
|
| 98.18 ± 2.41 |
|
| 17.42 ± 0.30 |
Note: values are the mean ± SD (n = 3), = positive control.
Figure 3Comparison of percentage radical scavenging of ascorbic acid and plant extracts.
The IC50 values of plant extracts on inhibition of α-amylase.
| Plant samples | IC50 for the |
|---|---|
|
| 1021.09 ± 29.05 |
|
| 651.58 ± 10.32 |
|
| 801.44 ± 6.00 |
|
| 1149.98 ± 12.62 |
|
| 107.47 ± 1.38 |
Note: values are the mean ± SD (n = 3), = positive control.
Figure 4α-amylase inhibitory activity of plant extracts and standard acarbose.