| Literature DB >> 36224662 |
Arata Nakajima1, Masato Sonobe2, Yorikazu Akatsu2, Manabu Yamada2, Keiichiro Yamamoto2, Junya Saito2, Masaki Norimoto2, Keita Koyama2, Shinji Taniguchi2, Hiroshi Takahashi3, Yasuchika Aoki4,5, Toru Suguro6, Koichi Nakagawa2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an established surgical treatment for advanced knee osteoarthritis by which patients can expect improvement of knee pain and function. Although many surgeons have investigated limb alignment after TKA, changes in coronal positional relation between the femur and tibia are not known well.Entities:
Keywords: Femoral condyle; Lateral shift; Medial pivot design; Simulation; Total knee arthroplasty
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36224662 PMCID: PMC9559023 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03342-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.677
Fig. 1The FINE total knee. The femoral condyle has an asymmetric shape and femorotibial joint line with an oblique 3° both in coronal (left) and axial (right) planes which is incorporated into the implant design. The medial surface of the polyethylene insert has a convex curve while the lateral surface possesses a flat surface. FINE reproduces anatomical geometry by conducting osteotomy perpendicular to the mechanical axis. The figure is reprinted with minor modifications from Fig. 1 in the reference no. 7
Demographic data of the patients and radiographic parameters of the knee
| Male ( | Female ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 35.8 ± 8.1 | 39.5 ± 7.9 | 0.021* |
| Height (cm) | 173.2 ± 6.1 | 159.9 ± 5.2 | 0.000* |
| Weight (kg) | 74.3 ± 12.0 | 60.6 ± 9.2 | 0.000* |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.6 ± 3.4 | 23.7 ± 3.6 | 0.176* |
| FTA (o) | 177.0 ± 1.9 | 176.0 ± 2.2 | 0.019* |
| LDFA (o) | 81.2 ± 2.1 | 81.0 ± 2.2 | 0.679 |
| MPTA (o) | 84.8 ± 1.9 | 85.3 ± 1.7 | 0.161 |
BMI: body mass index, FTA: femorotibial angle, LDFA: lateral distal femoral angle, MPTA: medial proximal tibial angle. Significantly different. *p < 0.05
Fig. 2Simulation of TKA with the medial pivot design (the FINE total knee) on knee radiographs of young patients. The femoral component was placed to reproduce the form of the distal femoral condyles of the patients and not to overhang (A, green). The tibial component was placed in neutral alignment with the lateral joint line of the minimum thickness (7 mm) of the insert reproducing the original joint line. Then, we placed the femoral component to merge with the medial concave of the tibial insert (B, red). The length of the lateral shift of the femoral component was measured (C, a yellow bar). In this case, the 2L size was chosen and the lateral shift was 5.83 mm
Estimated lateral shift of the femoral condyle
| Male ( | Female ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lateral shift (mm) | 6.41 ± 1.95 | 5.43 ± 1.90 | 0.011* |
Significantly different. *p < 0.05
Correlations between radiographic parameters and lateral shift of the femoral condyle
| Age | FTA | LDFA | MPTA | Lateral shift | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | − 0.024 | 0.132 | 0.142 | − 0.027 | |
| FTA | 0.505** | − 0.355** | 0.220* | ||
| LDFA | 0.309** | − 0.215* | |||
| MPTA | − 0.553** |
FTA: femorotibial angle, LDFA: lateral distal femoral angle, MPTA: medial proximal tibial angle. Significantly different. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
Fig. 3Correlations between the estimated lateral shift of the femoral condyle and radiographic parameters of the knee. The lateral shift of the femoral condyle was most highly correlated with MPTA (r = − 0.553), and weakly correlated with LDFA (r = − 0.215) and FTA (r = 0.220). MPTA, medial proximal tibial angle; LDFA, lateral distal femoral angle; FTA, femorotibial angle
Fig. 4Comparison of the estimated lateral shift of the femoral condyle between size groups for the FINE knee. Group 1 includes sizes for S, S + and M; group 2 for M + and L; group 3 for 2L and 3L. Group 3 significantly shifted more laterally compared with group 1 (p < 0.01). Thick horizontal line: median value; box: interquartile range (IQR); whiskers: most extreme points within 1.5 times the IQR from the limits of the box