| Literature DB >> 36224631 |
Anom Bowolaksono1, Ayu Mulia Sundari2,3, Muhammad Fauzi2,4, Mila Maidarti5,6, Budi Wiweko5,6, Kresna Mutia5, Pritta Ameilia Iffanolida5, Ririn Rahmala Febri5, Astari Dwiranti2, Hiroaki Funahashi7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recently, as a delayed childbearing trend is emerging in modern women's adulthood, diminished reproductive potential due to age-related changes is more prevalent. Reduction in the abundance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copies and circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) have been separately reported with aging, contributing to the decrease in successful reproduction. However, there are limited reports on the impact of age on mtDNA and AMH in the same individual and whether mtDNA copy numbers are influenced by age and AMH.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Anti-Müllerian hormone; Fertility; Granulosa cells; Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36224631 PMCID: PMC9558397 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-022-01047-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ovarian Res ISSN: 1757-2215 Impact factor: 5.506
Demographic and baseline characteristics of participants
| Characteristics | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 32.16 ± 4.14 |
| Type of infertility [n (%)] | |
| Primary | 39 (90.70) |
| Secondary | 4 (9.30) |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.67 ± 3.80 |
| Etiology of infertility [n (%)] | |
| Tubal factor | 12 (27.90) |
| Male factor | 13 (30.24) |
| Unexplained | 18 (41.86) |
| AMH (ng/mL) | 3.35 (0.02 – 14.77) |
|
| |
| Total gonadotropin dosage (IU) | 3181 (900 – 5325) |
| Endometrial thickness (mm) | 9.73 ± 3.99 |
| Number of oocytes retrieved | 13.42 ± 7.09 |
| Number of mature oocytes | 12.05 ± 5.92 |
|
| |
| Number of fertilized oocytes | 8.12 ± 6.40 |
| Number of transferred embryo | 0 (0 – 2) |
Fig. 1Comparison of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) copy number between normal weight (NW) [N = 24], overweight (OW) [N = 14], and obese (OB) [N = 5] subjects (A), between LH-administered [N = 27] and non-administered subjects [N = 16] (B), and between GH-administered [N = 22] and non-administered subjects [N = 21] (C). mtDNA copies are relatively quantified to the amount of B2M. All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) obtained from two separate experiments (Duplo). (BMI group was analyzed by ANOVA; LH and GH group were analyzed by t-test). *ns: not significant
Fig. 2Simple linear regression between age and mtDNA copy number (r = −0.54, P < 0.001) (A), between age and AMH level level (r = −0.48, P < 0.001) (B), and between AMH level and mtDNA copy number (r = 0.88, P < 0.001) (C). mtDNA copies are relatively quantified to the amount of B2M. All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) obtained from two separate experiments (Duplo) (Data was analyzed using Pearson’s correlation)
Result of multivariate linear regression analysis
| Variable | β | SE | |t| | P-Value | P-Value Summary | VIF | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | -1.043 | 0.5448 | 1.915 | 0.0628 | ns | 1.297 | 0.80 |
| AMH | 25.19 | 2.785 | 9.801 | < 0.0001 | **** |
Fig. 3Comparison of pregnancy frequency according to age (A), mtDNA copy number (B), and age (C) when stratified into < 35 and ≥ 35 years old. mtDNA copies are relatively quantified to the amount of B2M. All values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) obtained from two separate experiments (Duplo) (Pregnancy data according to mtDNA copies and age were analyzed using a t-test; pregnancy proportion according to age group was analyzed using Fisher’s exact test). *ns: not significant