Literature DB >> 21067717

Impact of luteinizing hormone administration on gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles: an age-adjusted analysis.

Ernesto Bosch1, Elena Labarta, Juana Crespo, Carlos Simón, José Remohí, Antonio Pellicer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of LH administration on cycle outcome in ovarian stimulation with GnRH antagonists.
DESIGN: Randomized, open-label, controlled trial performed in two age subgroups. Recombinant (r) FSH versus rFSH + rLH administration was compared.
SETTING: University-affiliated private infertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Up to 35 years old (n = 380) and aged 36 to 39 years (n = 340), undergoing their first or second IVF cycle. INTERVENTION(S): Recombinant LH administration since stimulation day 1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): In the young population, implantation rates were similar: 27.8% versus 28.6%, odds ratio (OR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.73-1.47), as was the ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle: 37.4% versus 37.4%, OR 1.0 (95% CI 0.66-1.52). In older patients, the implantation rate was significantly higher in the rFSH + rLH group: 26.7% versus 18.6%, OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.04-2.33). Ongoing pregnancy rates per started cycle were 33.5% versus 25.3%, OR 1.49 (95% CI 0.93-2.38). CONCLUSION(S): Recombinant LH administration significantly increased the implantation rate in patients aged 36 to 39 years. A clinically relevant better ongoing pregnancy rate per started cycle was observed, although the difference was not statistically significant. Patients younger than 36 years do not obtain any benefit from rLH administration.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21067717     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  32 in total

1.  Improved pregnancy rates with luteinizing hormone supplementation in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Authors:  Nicole D Paterson; Shu C Foong; Calvin A Greene
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Outcome of in vitro fertilization in patients with proven poor ovarian responsiveness after early vs. mid-follicular LH exposure: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Alessandra Chiado'; Daniela Guidetti; Francesca Bongioanni; Valentina Rovei; Gianluca Gennarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  [Effects of luteinizing hormone supplementation on outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in patients undergoing GnRH-agonist long protocol].

Authors:  Yu Deng; Min-Na Yin; Pei-Ling Liang; Zhi-Heng Chen; Ling Sun
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2017-11-20

Review 4.  Ovarian manipulation in ART: going beyond physiological standards to provide best clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Israel Ortega; Juan A García-Velasco; Antonio Pellicer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-28       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  The effect of rLH supplementation to the GnRH-antagonist protocol on endocrine dynamics in the advanced reproductive age.

Authors:  J S Younis; I Izhaki; M Ben-Ami
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 4.256

6.  Effects of propylene glycol or elevated luteinizing hormone during follicle development on ovulation, fertilization, and early embryo development.

Authors:  Katherine S Hackbart; Robb W Bender; Paulo D Carvalho; Lais M Vieira; Ana R Dresch; Jerry N Guenther; Hidir Gencoglu; Anibal B Nascimento; Randy D Shaver; Milo C Wiltbank
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 4.285

7.  Efficacy of low dose hCG on oocyte maturity for ovarian stimulation in poor responder women undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tahereh Madani; Ladan Mohammadi Yeganeh; Shabnam Khodabakhshi; Mohammad Reza Akhoond; Fatemeh Hasani
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Reduced FSH and LH action: implications for medically assisted reproduction.

Authors:  E Bosch; C Alviggi; M Lispi; A Conforti; A C Hanyaloglu; D Chuderland; M Simoni; N Raine-Fenning; P Crépieux; S Kol; V Rochira; T D'Hooghe; P Humaidan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.918

9.  Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alessandro Conforti; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan; Salvatore Longobardi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Raoul Orvieto; Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Fulvio Zullo; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

10.  Addition of low dose hCG to rFSh benefits older women during ovarian stimulation for IVF.

Authors:  Hala Gomaa; Robert F Casper; Navid Esfandiari; Paul Chang; Yaakov Bentov
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.