Stamatina Iliodromiti1,2, James McLaren3, Nazim Ghouri4, Melissa R Miller5, Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard6,7, Jennifer Linge6, Stuart Ballantyne8, Jonathan Platt8, John Foster9, Scott Hanvey10, Unjali P Gujral11, Alka Kanaya12, Naveed Sattar4, Mary Ann Lumsden13, Jason M R Gill4. 1. Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. s.iliodromiti@qmul.ac.uk. 2. School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. s.iliodromiti@qmul.ac.uk. 3. School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. james.mclaren@glasgow.ac.uk. 4. School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. 5. Worldwide Research Development and Medical, Pfizer, Cambridge, MA, USA. 6. AMRA Medical AB, Linköping, Sweden. 7. Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. 8. Department of Radiology, Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS, Glasgow, UK. 9. Department of Clinical Physics and Bioengineering, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK. 10. Radiotherapy Physics, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK. 11. Hubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 12. Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 13. School of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: South Asians have a two- to fivefold higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes than those of white European descent. Greater central adiposity and storage of fat in deeper or ectopic depots are potential contributing mechanisms. We collated existing and new data on the amount of subcutaneous (SAT), visceral (VAT) and liver fat in adults of South Asian and white European descent to provide a robust assessment of potential ethnic differences in these factors. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the Embase and PubMed databases from inception to August 2021. Unpublished imaging data were also included. The weighted standardised mean difference (SMD) for each adiposity measure was estimated using random-effects models. The quality of the studies was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool for risk of bias and overall certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The study was pre-registered with the OSF Registries ( https://osf.io/w5bf9 ). RESULTS: We summarised imaging data on SAT, VAT and liver fat from eight published and three previously unpublished datasets, including a total of 1156 South Asian and 2891 white European men, and 697 South Asian and 2271 white European women. Despite South Asian men having a mean BMI approximately 0.5-0.7 kg/m2 lower than white European men (depending on the comparison), nine studies showed 0.34 SMD (95% CI 0.12, 0.55; I2=83%) more SAT and seven studies showed 0.56 SMD (95% CI 0.14, 0.98; I2=93%) more liver fat, but nine studies had similar VAT (-0.03 SMD; 95% CI -0.24, 0.19; I2=85%) compared with their white European counterparts. South Asian women had an approximately 0.9 kg/m2 lower BMI but 0.31 SMD (95% CI 0.14, 0.48; I2=53%) more liver fat than their white European counterparts in five studies. Subcutaneous fat levels (0.03 SMD; 95% CI -0.17, 0.23; I2=72%) and VAT levels (0.04 SMD; 95% CI -0.16, 0.24; I2=71%) did not differ significantly between ethnic groups in eight studies of women. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: South Asian men and women appear to store more ectopic fat in the liver compared with their white European counterparts with similar BMI levels. Given the emerging understanding of the importance of liver fat in diabetes pathogenesis, these findings help explain the greater diabetes risks in South Asians. FUNDING: There was no primary direct funding for undertaking the systematic review and meta-analysis.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: South Asians have a two- to fivefold higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes than those of white European descent. Greater central adiposity and storage of fat in deeper or ectopic depots are potential contributing mechanisms. We collated existing and new data on the amount of subcutaneous (SAT), visceral (VAT) and liver fat in adults of South Asian and white European descent to provide a robust assessment of potential ethnic differences in these factors. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the Embase and PubMed databases from inception to August 2021. Unpublished imaging data were also included. The weighted standardised mean difference (SMD) for each adiposity measure was estimated using random-effects models. The quality of the studies was assessed using the ROBINS-E tool for risk of bias and overall certainty of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. The study was pre-registered with the OSF Registries ( https://osf.io/w5bf9 ). RESULTS: We summarised imaging data on SAT, VAT and liver fat from eight published and three previously unpublished datasets, including a total of 1156 South Asian and 2891 white European men, and 697 South Asian and 2271 white European women. Despite South Asian men having a mean BMI approximately 0.5-0.7 kg/m2 lower than white European men (depending on the comparison), nine studies showed 0.34 SMD (95% CI 0.12, 0.55; I2=83%) more SAT and seven studies showed 0.56 SMD (95% CI 0.14, 0.98; I2=93%) more liver fat, but nine studies had similar VAT (-0.03 SMD; 95% CI -0.24, 0.19; I2=85%) compared with their white European counterparts. South Asian women had an approximately 0.9 kg/m2 lower BMI but 0.31 SMD (95% CI 0.14, 0.48; I2=53%) more liver fat than their white European counterparts in five studies. Subcutaneous fat levels (0.03 SMD; 95% CI -0.17, 0.23; I2=72%) and VAT levels (0.04 SMD; 95% CI -0.16, 0.24; I2=71%) did not differ significantly between ethnic groups in eight studies of women. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: South Asian men and women appear to store more ectopic fat in the liver compared with their white European counterparts with similar BMI levels. Given the emerging understanding of the importance of liver fat in diabetes pathogenesis, these findings help explain the greater diabetes risks in South Asians. FUNDING: There was no primary direct funding for undertaking the systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors: P M McKeigue; M G Marmot; A M Adelstein; S P Hunt; M J Shipley; S M Butler; R A Riemersma; P R Turner Journal: Lancet Date: 1985-11-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Sonia S Anand; Mark A Tarnopolsky; Shirya Rashid; Karleen M Schulze; Dipika Desai; Andrew Mente; Sandy Rao; Salim Yusuf; Hertzel C Gerstein; Arya M Sharma Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Manisha Chandalia; Ping Lin; Thanalakshmi Seenivasan; Edward H Livingston; Peter G Snell; Scott M Grundy; Nicola Abate Journal: PLoS One Date: 2007-08-29 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Stamatina Iliodromiti; Nazim Ghouri; Carlos A Celis-Morales; Naveed Sattar; Mary Ann Lumsden; Jason M R Gill Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 3.240