Literature DB >> 36221017

Temporal Modulation of DNA Methylation and Gene Expression in Monolayer and 3D Spheroids of Dental Pulp Stem Cells during Osteogenic Differentiation: A Comparative Study.

Shalini Raik1, Reetu Thakur2, Vidya Rattan3, Navin Kumar4, Arnab Pal5, Shalmoli Bhattacharyya6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Human mesenchymal stem cells are being used for various regenerative applications in past decades. This study chronicled a temporal profile of the transcriptional pattern and promoter methylation status of the osteogenic related gene in dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) derived from 3-dimensional spheroid culture (3D) vis a vis 2-dimensional (2D) monolayer culture upon osteogenic induction.
METHODS: Biomimetic properties of osteogenesis were determined by alkaline phosphatase assay and alizarin red staining. Gene expression and promoter methylation status of osteogenic genes such as runt-related transcription factor-2, collagen1α1, osteocalcin (OCN), and DLX5 (distal-homeobox) were performed by qPCR assay and bisulfite sequencing, respectively. Furthermore, µ-Computed tomography (micro-CT) was performed to examine the new bone formation in critical-sized rat calvarial bone defect model.
RESULTS: Our results indicated a greater inclination of spheroid culture-derived DPSCs toward osteogenic lineage than the monolayer culture. The bisulfite sequencing of the promoter region of osteogenic genes revealed sustenance of low methylation levels in DPSCs during the progression of osteogenic differentiation. However, the significant difference in the methylation pattern between 2D and 3D derived DPSCs were identified only for OCN gene promoter. We observed differences in the mRNA expression pattern of epigenetic writers such as DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and methyl-cytosine dioxygenases (TET) between the two culture conditions. Further, the DPSC spheroids showed enhanced new bone formation ability in an animal model of bone defect compared to the cells cultivated in a 2D platform which further substantiated our in-vitro observations.
CONCLUSION: The distinct cellular microenvironment induced changes in DNA methylation pattern and expression of epigenetic regulators such as DNMTs and TETs genes may lead to increase expression of osteogenic markers in 3D spheroid culture of DPSCs which make DPSCs spheroids suitable for osteogenic regeneration compared to monolayers.
© 2022. Korean Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-Dimensional spheroid culture; Bisulfite sequencing; Bone regeneration; Osteogenic differentiation; Promoter methylation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36221017     DOI: 10.1007/s13770-022-00485-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1738-2696            Impact factor:   4.451


  67 in total

Review 1.  Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors.

Authors:  Rasheena Edmondson; Jessica Jenkins Broglie; Audrey F Adcock; Liju Yang
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.738

Review 2.  Progress in the use of dental pulp stem cells in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Eduardo Anitua; María Troya; Mar Zalduendo
Journal:  Cytotherapy       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.414

3.  Secretome proteins regulate comparative osteogenic and adipogenic potential in bone marrow and dental stem cells.

Authors:  Ajay Kumar; Vinod Kumar; Vidya Rattan; Vivekananda Jha; Shalmoli Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Biochimie       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 4.079

Review 4.  Cell microenvironment engineering and monitoring for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: the recent advances.

Authors:  Julien Barthes; Hayriye Özçelik; Mathilde Hindié; Albana Ndreu-Halili; Anwarul Hasan; Nihal Engin Vrana
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Stem Cell Mechanobiology and the Role of Biomaterials in Governing Mechanotransduction and Matrix Production for Tissue Regeneration.

Authors:  S M Naqvi; L M McNamara
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-12-14

Review 6.  Dental pulp stem cells as a multifaceted tool for bioengineering and the regeneration of craniomaxillofacial tissues.

Authors:  Maitane Aurrekoetxea; Patricia Garcia-Gallastegui; Igor Irastorza; Jon Luzuriaga; Verónica Uribe-Etxebarria; Fernando Unda; Gaskon Ibarretxe
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Human dental pulp stem cells differentiation to neural cells, osteocytes and adipocytes-An in vitro study.

Authors:  Alexander M Luke; Rajashree Patnaik; Sam Kuriadom; Salem Abu-Fanas; Simy Mathew; Krishna P Shetty
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-01-06

Review 8.  Is It Time to Start Transitioning From 2D to 3D Cell Culture?

Authors:  Caleb Jensen; Yong Teng
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2020-03-06

Review 9.  The physical microenvironment of hematopoietic stem cells and its emerging roles in engineering applications.

Authors:  Pan Zhang; Chen Zhang; Jing Li; Jiyang Han; Xiru Liu; Hui Yang
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 10.  Pulp stem cells derived from human permanent and deciduous teeth: Biological characteristics and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Xin Shi; Jing Mao; Yan Liu
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 6.940

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.