Literature DB >> 36219391

Return to work after adult spinal deformity surgery.

Brian J Neuman1, Kevin Y Wang1, Andrew B Harris1, Micheal Raad1, Richard A Hostin2, Themisctocles S Protopsaltis3, Christopher P Ames4, Peter G Passias3, Munish C Gupta5, Eric O Klineberg6, Robert Hart7, Shay Bess8, Khaled M Kebaish9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the proportions of patients returning to work at various points after adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery and the associations between surgical invasiveness and time to return to work.
METHODS: Using a multicenter database of patients treated surgically for ASD from 2008 to 2015, we identified 188 patients (mean age 51 ± 15 years) who self-reported as employed preoperatively and had 2-year follow-up. Per the ASD-Surgical and Radiographical Invasiveness Index (ASD-SR), 118 patients (63%) underwent high-invasiveness (HI) surgery (ASD-SR ≥ 100) and 70 (37%) had low-invasiveness (LI) surgery (ASD-SR < 100). Patients who self-reported ≥ 75% normal level of work/school activity were considered to be working full time. Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical variables (α = .05).
RESULTS: Preoperatively, 69% of employed patients worked full time. Postoperatively, 15% of employed patients were full time at 6 weeks, 70% at 6 months, 83% at 1 year, and 84% at 2 years. Percentage of employed patients working full time at 2 years was greater than preoperatively (p < .001); percentage of patients returning to full time at 6 weeks was lower in the HI (5%) than in the LI group (19%) (p = .03), a difference not significant at later points.
CONCLUSIONS: Most adults returned to full-time work after ASD surgery. A smaller percentage of patients in the HI group than in the LI group returned to full-time work at 6 weeks. Patients employed full time preoperatively will likely return to full-time employment after ASD surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult Spinal Deformity Surgical and Radiographical Invasiveness Index; Adult spinal deformity; Employment; Return to work; Surgical invasiveness

Year:  2022        PMID: 36219391     DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00552-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  20 in total

1.  The impact of clinical, morphological, psychosocial and work-related factors on the outcome of lumbar discectomy.

Authors:  V Schade; N Semmer; C J Main; J Hora; N Boos
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  Cost minimization in treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Omar M Uddin; Raqeeb Haque; Patrick A Sugrue; Yousef M Ahmed; Tarek Y El Ahmadieh; Joel M Press; Tyler Koski; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2015-08-28

3.  Three-year postoperative outcomes between MIS and conventional TLIF in1-segment lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  You Lv; Jingyang Chen; Jinchuan Chen; Yuling Wu; Xiangyang Chen; Yi Liu; Zhaoming Chu; Luxin Sheng; Rujie Qin; Ming Chen
Journal:  Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 2.442

4.  Health-related quality of life outcomes in complex adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Max S Riley; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Jonathan Dalton; Michael P Kelly
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-11-24

Review 5.  Cost-Effectiveness in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Grigoriy G Arutyunyan; Peter D Angevine; Sigurd Berven
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  Analysis of National Rates, Cost, and Sources of Cost Variation in Adult Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Corinna C Zygourakis; Caterina Y Liu; Malla Keefe; Christopher Moriates; John Ratliff; R Adams Dudley; Ralph Gonzales; Praveen V Mummaneni; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Herniectomy versus herniectomy with the DIAM spinal stabilization system in patients with sciatica and concomitant low back pain: results of a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial.

Authors:  Ferdinand Krappel; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Giovanni Alessi; Jean-Michel Remacle; Luis Alberto Lopez; Jesus Javier Fernández; Gianluca Maestretti; Christian W A Pfirrmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Return to work following surgery for lumbar radiculopathy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eva Huysmans; Lisa Goudman; Griet Van Belleghem; Mats De Jaeger; Maarten Moens; Jo Nijs; Kelly Ickmans; Ronald Buyl; Christophe Vanroelen; Koen Putman
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 9.  Adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Bassel G Diebo; Neil V Shah; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Feng Zhu; Dominique A Rothenfluh; Carl B Paulino; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Return to work after spinal stenosis surgery and the patient's quality of life.

Authors:  Aleksandra Truszczyńska; Kazimierz Rąpała; Olaf Truszczyński; Adam Tarnowski; Stanisław Łukawski
Journal:  Int J Occup Med Environ Health       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 1.843

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.