Literature DB >> 36219381

How effective are ionization state-based QSPKR models at predicting pharmacokinetic parameters in humans?

Anish Gomatam1, Blessy Joseph1, Poonam Advani2, Mushtaque Shaikh3, Krishna Iyer1, Evans Coutinho4.   

Abstract

Optimizing the pharmacokinetics (PK) of a drug candidate to support oral dosing is a key challenge in drug development. PK parameters are usually estimated from the concentration-time profile following intravenous administration; however, traditional methods are time-consuming and expensive. In recent years, quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationship (QSPKR), an in silico tool that aims to develop a mathematical relationship between the structure of a molecule and its PK properties, has emerged as a useful alternative to experimental testing. Due to the complex nature of the various processes involved in dictating the fate of a drug, the development of adequate QSPKR models that can be used in real-world pre-screening situations has proved challenging. Given the crucial role played by a molecule's ionization state in determining its PK properties, this work aims to build predictive QSPKR models for PK parameters in humans using an ionization state-based strategy. We divide a high-quality dataset into clusters based on ionization state at physiological pH and build global and ion subset-based 'local' models for three major PK parameters: plasma clearance (CL), steady-state volume of distribution (VDss), and half-life (t1/2). We use a robust methodology developed in our lab entitled 'EigenValue ANalySis' that accounts for the stereospecificity in drug disposition and use the support vector machine algorithm for model building. Our findings suggest that categorizing compounds in accordance with ionization state does not result in improved QSPKR models. The narrow ranges in the endpoints along with redundancies in the data adversely affect the ion subset-based QSPKR models. We suggest alternative approaches such as elimination route-based models that account for drug-transporter interactions for CL and chemotype-specific QSPKR for VDss.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clearance; Half-life; In silico; Pharmacokinetics; QSPKR; Volume of distribution

Year:  2022        PMID: 36219381     DOI: 10.1007/s11030-022-10520-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Divers        ISSN: 1381-1991            Impact factor:   3.364


  23 in total

1.  Prediction of steady-state volume of distribution of acidic drugs by quantitative structure-pharmacokinetics relationships.

Authors:  Zvetanka Zhivkova; Irini Doytchinova
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 2.  Quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationships.

Authors:  Chao Xu; Donald E Mager
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 3.  3D-QSAR in drug design--a review.

Authors:  Jitender Verma; Vijay M Khedkar; Evans C Coutinho
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  In Silico Prediction of Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability of Compounds by Machine Learning and Resampling Methods.

Authors:  Zhuang Wang; Hongbin Yang; Zengrui Wu; Tianduanyi Wang; Weihua Li; Yun Tang; Guixia Liu
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  In Silico Prediction of Human Renal Clearance of Compounds Using Quantitative Structure-Pharmacokinetic Relationship Models.

Authors:  Jianhui Chen; Hongbin Yang; Lan Zhu; Zengrui Wu; Weihua Li; Yun Tang; Guixia Liu
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.739

6.  In Silico Prediction of Human Intravenous Pharmacokinetic Parameters with Improved Accuracy.

Authors:  Yuchen Wang; Haichun Liu; Yuanrong Fan; Xingye Chen; Yan Yang; Lu Zhu; Junnan Zhao; Yadong Chen; Yanmin Zhang
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  Quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationships for the prediction of renal clearance in humans.

Authors:  Rutwij A Dave; Marilyn E Morris
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.922

8.  Pharmacokinetics of warfarin enantiomers: a search for intrasubject correlations.

Authors:  L B Wingard; R A O'Reilly; G Levy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 6.875

9.  Phenotypic differences in mephenytoin pharmacokinetics in normal subjects.

Authors:  P J Wedlund; W S Aslanian; E Jacqz; C B McAllister; R A Branch; G R Wilkinson
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Prediction of volume of distribution values in humans for neutral and basic drugs using physicochemical measurements and plasma protein binding data.

Authors:  Franco Lombardo; R Scott Obach; Marina Y Shalaeva; Feng Gao
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.