Literature DB >> 36219253

Choice of specimen's extraction site affects wound morbidity in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Mahmood Al Dhaheri1, Mohanad Ibrahim2, Omer Al-Yahri2, Ibrahim Amer3, Mahwish Khawar3, Noof Al-Naimi3, Ayman Abdelhafiz Ahmed3, Mohamed Abu Nada3, Amjad Parvaiz3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice for an ideal site of specimen extraction following laparoscopic colorectal surgery remains debatable. However, midline incision (MI) is usually employed for right and left-sided colonic resections while left iliac fossa or suprapubic transverse incision (STI) were reserved for sigmoid and rectal cancer resections.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) and incisional hernia (IH) in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer and specimen extraction via MI or STI.
METHOD: Prospectively collected data of elective laparoscopic colorectal cancer resections between January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. MI was employed for right and left-sided colonic resections while STI was used for sigmoid and rectal resections. SSI is defined according to the US CDC criteria. IH was diagnosed clinically and confirmed by CT scan at 1 year.
RESULTS: A total of 168 patients underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal resections. MI was used in 90 patients while 78 patients had STI as an extraction site. Demographic and preoperative data is similar for two groups. The rate of IH was 13.3% for MI and 0% in the STI (p = 0.001). SSI was seen in 16.7% of MI vs 11.5% of STI (p = 0.34). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the choice of extraction site is associated with statistically significant higher incisional hernia rate.
CONCLUSION: MI for specimen extraction is associated with higher incidence of both SSI and IH. The choice of incision for extraction site is an independent predicative factor for significantly higher IH and increased SSI rates.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer; Incisional hernia; Laparoscopic surgery; Specimen extraction site; Surgical site infection

Year:  2022        PMID: 36219253     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02701-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   2.895


  18 in total

1.  Risk factors for surgical site infection after elective resection of the colon and rectum: a single-center prospective study of 2,809 consecutive patients.

Authors:  R Tang; H H Chen; Y L Wang; C R Changchien; J S Chen; K C Hsu; J M Chiang; J Y Wang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Significant reduction in the incidence of small bowel obstruction and ventral hernia after laparoscopic compared to open segmental colorectal resection.

Authors:  Daniel D Klaristenfeld; Elisabeth C McLemore; Bonnie H Li; Mohammad A Abbass; Maher A Abbas
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 3.  Incidence of incisional hernia in the specimen extraction site for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lawrence Lee; Maria Abou-Khalil; Sender Liberman; Marylise Boutros; Gerald M Fried; Liane S Feldman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy?

Authors:  Ashwin DeSouza; Bastian Domajnko; John Park; Slawomir Marecik; Leela Prasad; Herand Abcarian
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Use of a Pfannenstiel incision in minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery is associated with a lower risk of wound complications.

Authors:  S T Orcutt; C J Balentine; C L Marshall; C N Robinson; D A Anaya; A Artinyan; S S Awad; D H Berger; D Albo
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Extraction site location and incisional hernias after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: should we be avoiding the midline?

Authors:  Hoda Samia; Justin Lawrence; Tamar Nobel; Sharon Stein; Bradley J Champagne; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Impact of laparoscopic colorectal resection on surgical site infection.

Authors:  Jensen T Poon; Wai-Lun Law; Ivan W Wong; Patricia T Ching; Lisa M Wong; Joe K M Fan; Oswens S H Lo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Long-term wound advantages of the laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer.

Authors:  C Laurent; F Leblanc; F Bretagnol; M Capdepont; E Rullier
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Short-term and Medium-term Outcomes of Low Midline and Low Transverse Incisions in Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Do Hoe Ku; Hyeon Seung Kim; Jin Yong Shin
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2019-11-13

10.  Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey.

Authors:  Daniel Dindo; Nicolas Demartines; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.